Some questions, Will CS support IPv6 in basic zone/network? Does that mean CS support both host and guest IPv6 in 4.1?
Anthony > -----Original Message----- > From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org] > Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 1:02 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [ASFCS41] IPv6 Support > > On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:45 AM, Sheng Yang <sh...@yasker.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Chip Childers > > <chip.child...@sungard.com> wrote: > >> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Chiradeep Vittal > >> <chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> On 12/19/12 12:44 PM, "Chip Childers" <chip.child...@sungard.com> > wrote: > >>> > >>>>On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 3:12 PM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> wrote: > >>>>> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Chiradeep Vittal > >>>>> <chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote: > >>>>>> Since it is a vast topic, I added subtasks in the Jira bug to > make it > >>>>>>more > >>>>>> manageable. > >>>>>> > >>>>>>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK- > 452?subTaskView=all#iss > >>>>>>uet > >>>>>> able > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> This is indeed a massive feature - are you sure that this is > >>>>> achievable in the 4.1 timeframe??? > >>>>> > >>>>> --David > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>>I don't see fix versions of the Jira records set to 4.1.0. I'm > going > >>>>to set them to the "Future" release as fix version, and if the > folks > >>>>developing the feature are able to pull some component into 4.1.0, > we > >>>>can discuss that specifically. > >>> > >>> I see that the subtasks have been moved into separate bugs. For the > >>> record, these are > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-673 to CLOUDSTACK- > 679 > >>> > >>> > >> > >> They are all still sub tasks of the parent though... I just changed > >> the fix versions of the parent and child tasks. > > > > I think for 4.1, we can get non-isolated network works. Because it > > only involved DNS and DHCP, should be a nice first step. > > > > For LB and firewall, that's much more complex, we can do it later. > > > > --Sheng > > One question regarding security group in advance network. Anyone has > an estimate on how much effort it would take to support ipv6 with it? > If we would have dual stack. > > --Sheng
