Mike:
Any update on this?
--David
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 8:17 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Mike McClurg wrote:
>> On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 4:12 AM, David Nalley wrote:
>>> I just looked at xenserverjava (the version shipped today 5.6.100-1,
>>> and 6.0.0-1)
>>>
>
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Mike McClurg wrote:
> On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 4:12 AM, David Nalley wrote:
>> I just looked at xenserverjava (the version shipped today 5.6.100-1,
>> and 6.0.0-1)
>>
>> However, while there is a copy of ASLv2 in the source, it does so
>> because some dependencies
stly, we didn't look at XAPI 6.0.* yet.
And we are glad with XAPI 5.6.100.
Thanks
Anthony
> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Kluge
> Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 4:46 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: Anthony Xu
> Subject: RE: XAPI API (aka
> I can't speak for the folks at the ASF - perhaps asking on legal@ or filing a
> bug
> in Legal's Jira instance would get you a more qualified response. My question
> on this would be - is there any reason not to release the generating code?
I don't see why the generating code needs to be releas
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Mike McClurg wrote:
> On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 4:12 AM, David Nalley wrote:
>> I just looked at xenserverjava (the version shipped today 5.6.100-1,
>> and 6.0.0-1)
>>
>> However, while there is a copy of ASLv2 in the source, it does so
>> because some dependencies
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 4:12 AM, David Nalley wrote:
> I just looked at xenserverjava (the version shipped today 5.6.100-1,
> and 6.0.0-1)
>
> However, while there is a copy of ASLv2 in the source, it does so
> because some dependencies that it uses are licensed under ASLv2, but
> the actual code
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 6:49 AM, Mike McClurg wrote:
> I just checked the XenServer API bindings for Java, and it seems that
> we've dual-licensed them under the LGPLv2 and Apache v2.0 licenses.
> Are there different XenServer API bindings for Java that are licensed
> differently, that I'm not awa
>
> I suspect we'll have similar issues around vmware - which incidentally
> I didn't see in that list. I'll go add that now.
>
> --David
So on the page - VMware Infrastructure Java API is listed - which is
vijava.sourceforge.net - but unless something has changed really
recently - that's not what
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Robert Schweikert wrote:
> On 05/17/2012 01:26 AM, David Nalley wrote:
>>
>> Hi folks:
>>
>> I saw the recent changes to the dependency license page[1] and wanted
>> to discuss XAPI API - which I think is the xenserver-java package. I
>> don't think this is in any
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Robert Schweikert wrote:
>
> I know David mentioned he maintains a Fedora package, but this didn't sound
> like a straight forward undertaking.
Robert:
If you are interested, you can find my spec here:
http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/xenserverjava.spec
--David
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Robert Schweikert wrote:
> On 05/17/2012 01:26 AM, David Nalley wrote:
>>
>> Hi folks:
>>
>> I saw the recent changes to the dependency license page[1] and wanted
>> to discuss XAPI API - which I think is the xenserver-java package. I
>> don't think this is in any
On 05/17/2012 01:26 AM, David Nalley wrote:
Hi folks:
I saw the recent changes to the dependency license page[1] and wanted
to discuss XAPI API - which I think is the xenserver-java package. I
don't think this is in any of the currently targeted distributions.
And I just learned that this is C
On 05/18/2012 10:20 AM, Mike McClurg wrote:
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Robert Schweikert wrote:
On 05/18/2012 06:49 AM, Mike McClurg wrote:
These bindings are autogenerated, which is why there is no source
repository for them. The license on the API bindings generation code
is GPLv2, so
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Robert Schweikert wrote:
> On 05/18/2012 06:49 AM, Mike McClurg wrote:
>> These bindings are autogenerated, which is why there is no source
>> repository for them. The license on the API bindings generation code
>> is GPLv2, so I don't see any reason why we couldn'
On 05/18/2012 06:49 AM, Mike McClurg wrote:
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 5:20 AM, David Nalley wrote:
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 11:58 PM, Kevin Kluge wrote:
David, I had assumed that we could just get this library released under AL2 and
bundle the jar with CloudStack. It'd be great if distros pic
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 5:20 AM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 11:58 PM, Kevin Kluge wrote:
>> David, I had assumed that we could just get this library released under AL2
>> and bundle the jar with CloudStack. It'd be great if distros picked it up
>> but that seems more diffic
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 11:58 PM, Kevin Kluge wrote:
> David, I had assumed that we could just get this library released under AL2
> and bundle the jar with CloudStack. It'd be great if distros picked it up
> but that seems more difficult and longer term than a re-license, given our
> ability
, May 16, 2012 10:26 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: XAPI API (aka xenserver-java)
>
> Hi folks:
>
> I saw the recent changes to the dependency license page[1] and wanted to
> discuss XAPI API - which I think is the xenserver-java package. I don't
Hi folks:
I saw the recent changes to the dependency license page[1] and wanted
to discuss XAPI API - which I think is the xenserver-java package. I
don't think this is in any of the currently targeted distributions. I
maintain this package for Fedora and EPEL (so you can install it on
EL6.2 - but
19 matches
Mail list logo
