Mike: Any update on this?
--David On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 8:17 PM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> wrote: > On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Mike McClurg <mike.mccl...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 4:12 AM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> wrote: >>> I just looked at xenserverjava (the version shipped today 5.6.100-1, >>> and 6.0.0-1) >>> >>> However, while there is a copy of ASLv2 in the source, it does so >>> because some dependencies that it uses are licensed under ASLv2, but >>> the actual code itself has only GPLv2 headers. >> >> David, >> >> Thanks for spotting that. As I said, we should have no problem >> changing the license to something more suitable. I have a few >> questions. >> >> - What is the best license to release this software under? I expect >> that a permissive, BSD-like license would be acceptable for the Apache >> Foundation, yes? >> >> - Will it be necessary to also release the API generation code as >> well? This is something I want to do anyway, but I want to know if it >> will be required for the Apache Foundation. >> >> - Will we have to re-license and re-publish previously released >> versions of the xenserverjava library? Which versions does CloudStack >> depend on? Would it instead be sufficient to re-license the library in >> the next version of XenServer? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Mike > > Hey Mike, > > Any update on this relicensing issue? We have a proposed code freeze > in ~1 week, and AFAIK it's been around 2 months since I've seen any > updates on this. > > --David
