On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Alex Huang wrote:
> I wonder if we can do the following:
>
> - Tag all emails about release 4.0 with something like "[ASFCS40]". This is
> to allow developers to easily identify 4.0 chains and prioritize it.
+1 - I'll start doing that myself, as of today.
Ewan: comments below.
David: response to your point about OSCON conversations in another
part of this thread is also below.
Generally, I'm sorry if I came off sounding like an alarmist. That
wasn't my intent. I just don't want us to have an impedance missmatch
between our "plan" and what's actua
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Alex Huang wrote:
> From a developer pov, I've been finding our current release rather difficult
> to follow on the mailing list. I appreciate Chip's work in sending daily
> updates on what's been done. I've been relying on it to monitor the release
> progress
Wow each of these could be its own email thread.
>
> So we're < 3 days away from the proposed release candidate being cut.
> I'm not sure about other's opinion right now, but I think that we
> might have been overly optimistic in the target dates. The licensing
> issues alone are going to take lo
>From a developer pov, I've been finding our current release rather difficult
>to follow on the mailing list. I appreciate Chip's work in sending daily
>updates on what's been done. I've been relying on it to monitor the release
>progress but I wonder if this can be done more automatically.
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
>
> [Snip]
>
> So we're < 3 days away from the proposed release candidate being cut.
No we're not. We're 3 days away from the proposed opening of the release
branch, when we would stop developing features, and
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Ewan Mellor wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After my draft release plan last week, I've taken the feedback that I got
> (thanks for that, everyone) and I think we're ready to commit to this plan
> now.
>
> The timescales are very tight, but that's the aim - get something ou
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 4:31 AM, Arve Paalsrud
wrote:
> If someone updates the original message.properties to the latest version,
> we'll do a UI translation for Norwegian (no chance for the docs at this time
> though).
>
> -Arve
Arve,
I just updated this, but there were almost zero changes, an
If someone updates the original message.properties to the latest version, we'll
do a UI translation for Norwegian (no chance for the docs at this time though).
-Arve
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 10:15 PM, Mice Xia wrote:
> I can translate simplified Chinese resources.
> Before that I want to know the
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 10:15 PM, Mice Xia wrote:
> I can translate simplified Chinese resources.
> Before that I want to know the scope of this task, do ' internationalization'
> mean i18n (extracting messages to resource files, etc), or L10n (translation
> resources files to other languages), o
I can translate simplified Chinese resources.
Before that I want to know the scope of this task, do ' internationalization'
mean i18n (extracting messages to resource files, etc), or L10n (translation
resources files to other languages), or both of them?
-Original Message-
I would like
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 10:39 AM, David Nalley wrote:
> 3. Continue on the license audit path. This is really two fold:
> * Search for files that need ASF license headers.
> * Verify that there are no prohibited licenses.
> * Define the pieces of software that require attribution in Notice f
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 10:23:03AM -0400, Chip Childers wrote:
> "we are working towards" / "there are outstanding issues that will
> have to be resolved in a short period of time"
>
> Basically, hedge it a little bit... ;-)
Oh, absolutely. My main concern is the appearance of radio silence while
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 9:03 AM, Chip Childers
wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Ewan Mellor
> wrote:
>> David Nalley, Pradeep Soundararajan, Chip Childers, and Edison Su are
>> working on sorting out our build dependencies, turning off things that
>> depend on non-Apache SDKs (libvirt
"we are working towards" / "there are outstanding issues that will
have to be resolved in a short period of time"
Basically, hedge it a little bit... ;-)
-chip
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 02:33:07AM +0100, Ewan Mellor wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>>
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 02:33:07AM +0100, Ewan Mellor wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After my draft release plan last week, I've taken the feedback that I got
> (thanks for that, everyone) and I think we're ready to commit to this plan
> now.
OK. I'm going to put something on the blog and forums today ab
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Ewan Mellor wrote:
> David Nalley, Pradeep Soundararajan, Chip Childers, and Edison Su are working
> on sorting out our build dependencies, turning off things that depend on
> non-Apache SDKs (libvirt-java, mysql-connector-java, NetApp, F5, and VMware
> SDKs).
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 27, 2012 1:37 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: CloudStack 4.0 release plan
>
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Ewan Mellor
> wrote:
&g
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Ewan Mellor wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
>> Sent: 27 July 2012 08:14
>> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: CloudStack 4.0 release plan
>>
> In terms of future planning, that's a conversation I was hoping to start next
> week. We need to decide on whether we're doing feature-driven releases or
> time-based ones (my preference is time-based, but I'm open to arguments about
> that) and then we need to decide on a release cadence, a
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: 27 July 2012 08:14
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: CloudStack 4.0 release plan
>
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Wido den Hollander
> wrote:
> &
On 07/27/2012 05:13 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
How are we going to decide what is going into 4.0 and not?
Do we have a list of functionality what we want to see in 4.0?
Wido
If memory serves me, I thought the list previously agreed
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> How are we going to decide what is going into 4.0 and not?
>
> Do we have a list of functionality what we want to see in 4.0?
>
> Wido
If memory serves me, I thought the list previously agreed that 4.0
would focus on meeting the licens
On 07/26/2012 01:42 AM, Ewan Mellor wrote:
Hi all,
I'm putting together a plan for a CloudStack 4.0 release. This will be the
first release under the Apache (incubated) banner, which is the main reason for
the change in major version number.
This plan is a draft, and your comments are more
> -Original Message-
> From: Joe Brockmeier [mailto:j...@zonker.net]
> Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2012 7:56 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: CloudStack 4.0 release plan
>
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 12:42:33AM +0100, Ewan Mellor wrote:
> >
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 12:42:33AM +0100, Ewan Mellor wrote:
> This plan is a draft, and your comments are more than welcome.
>
>
> Development phase: Now - Friday 10 August.
> Release branch opens: Monday 13 August.
> Stability and bugfix work: Monday 13-Friday 17 August.
> Release candidate bui
26 matches
Mail list logo
