Original Message --------
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Please choose: The build system to use for 4.0
> From: Hugo Trippaers
> Date: Mon, August 20, 2012 2:09 am
> To: "cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org"
>
>
>
> Hey Darren,
>
>
>
> Good
Cool thanks, I'll looking using the Apache parent pom and the
apache-extras.
Darren
> Original Message
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Please choose: The build system to use for 4.0
> From: Olivier Lamy
> Date: Mon, August 20, 2012 12:47 am
>
g I can do to help out?
Cheers,
Hugo
-Original Message-
From: Darren Shepherd [mailto:dar...@godaddy.com]
Sent: Sunday, August 19, 2012 3:56 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Please choose: The build system to use for 4.0
All,
So I have maven fully
difficult.
>
> Regarding the ant tasks, I want to keep backwards compatibilty so that
> the main ant tasks still work but just internally call maven and not
> javac/jar directly.
>
> So I vote we just let me do this and I'll get 'er done.
>
> Darren
>
>
>
>
ing to be public, of course. That shouldn't be
> a problem!
>
> Ewan.
>
> > -----Original Message-
> > From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: 17 August 2012 14:19
> > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [DISC
,
> >
> > Ewan.
> >
> >
> >> -Original Message-----
> >> From: akaras...@gmail.com [mailto:akaras...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
> >> Alex Karasulu
> >> Sent: 17 August 2012 03:11
> >> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> &
It would be nice to
> get consensus on this issue, otherwise we're going to have to put it to a
> vote.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ewan.
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: akaras...@gmail.com [mailto:akaras...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
>> Alex Karasulu
&g
--Original Message-
> From: Justin Simms [mailto:justin.si...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 17 August 2012 14:02
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Please choose: The build system to use for 4.0
>
> I am +1 for Maven. I say we track the progress during the n
next*
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Justin Simms wrote:
> I am +1 for Maven. I say we track the progress during the nest week to
> week and a half before fully committing to that release schedule, unless 4
> weeks is the absolute latest.
>
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Chip Childers
> wr
I am +1 for Maven. I say we track the progress during the nest week to week
and a half before fully committing to that release schedule, unless 4 weeks
is the absolute latest.
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Ewan Mellor
> wrote:
> > With t
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Ewan Mellor wrote:
> With that extra time, does that change anyone's opinion? It would be nice to
> get consensus on this issue, otherwise we're going to have to put it to a
> vote.
Yup. I'm now +1 for Maven.
17 August 2012 03:11
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Please choose: The build system to use for 4.0
>
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>
> > +1 for Apache Maven
>
>
> Ditto but this can happen any time and
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> +1 for Apache Maven
Ditto but this can happen any time and in parallel. I understand and
appreciate the time limitations for the 4.0 release.
> (but I agree my POV can be considered non objective :-)
> ) or at least our own Apache dogfood
+1 for Apache Maven (but I agree my POV can be considered non objective :-)
) or at least our own Apache dogfood.
I agree this can late for 4.0 (why not for 4.1)
Btw if someone push poc on a branch I can help to review as I have a bit of
experience on (and Brett too :-) ).
--
Olivier
Le 16 août 20
From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012 7:57 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Please choose: The build system to use for 4.0
+1. I don't see why we should wait on this. There's people willing to do the
work. Le
an Mellor [mailto:ewan.mel...@eu.citrix.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2012 3:41 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Please choose: The build system to use for 4.0
>
> I don't think my opinion has changed since my email on the topic last week
.
Ewan.
> -Original Message-
> From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 16 August 2012 14:32
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Please choose: The build system to use for 4.0
>
> I would prefer to stick to ant for 4.0, parti
I would prefer to stick to ant for 4.0, particularly because switching
now could be a barrier to some devs in their progress toward bugfixing
4.0, if they have to take some time to get their build environment
working again... unless it's the very last thing you do.
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 3:26 PM,
On 08/16/2012 11:26 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
My preference is, based on timeline, to use ant for 4.0.
I agree on this one. I think a lot will break if we switch to Ant at the
last moment.
We could switch for 4.1, but I wouldn't do so for 4.0
Wido
- chip
Sent from my iPhone.
On Aug 16
My preference is, based on timeline, to use ant for 4.0.
- chip
Sent from my iPhone.
On Aug 16, 2012, at 5:12 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I am particularly limiting the scope of this to what we do for 4.0,
> since that is the pressing timeline.
>
> Here are the current options:
>
>
20 matches
Mail list logo
