Well, all our packages are going to be public, of course. That shouldn't be a problem!
Ewan. > -----Original Message----- > From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] > Sent: 17 August 2012 14:19 > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Please choose: The build system to use for 4.0 > > I'm totally fine with a switch, my only concern was around when it's done. > Aside from just implementing the build bits in the git repo (sounds like there > are resources for this), I picture there being a bit of work on every > developer's part to switch their dev environments. This might be as simple as > a few package installs, but on at least one occasion when I was building > something via Maven I had to spend the better part of an afternoon going > back and forth with the network/systems guys because Maven needed to > download some components and the applicable systems by default are > internal-access only. It's things like that where I worry about switching > build > systems when people are under a crunch to complete 4.0. > > On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Ewan Mellor <ewan.mel...@eu.citrix.com> > wrote: > > OK, so we've got offers of effort on Maven from Darren, Hugo, plus review > help from Olivier and Alex. Maven gets +1 from me, Alex, and Brett too. > > > > On the Ant side we've got +1 from Chip ("based on timeline"), Wido, > Marcus, and Mice. David has his deps-ctrl branch, but no-one has offered to > finish the job. > > > > We have consensus that the release is going to slip by at least 3 weeks (2 > > at > the front and one at the end), which gives us four weeks total to get the > build system done and debugged (i.e. between now and final release > candidate on Sep 14). > > > > With that extra time, does that change anyone's opinion? It would be nice > to get consensus on this issue, otherwise we're going to have to put it to a > vote. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Ewan. > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: akaras...@gmail.com [mailto:akaras...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of > >> Alex Karasulu > >> Sent: 17 August 2012 03:11 > >> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > >> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Please choose: The build system to use for 4.0 > >> > >> On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> wrote: > >> > >> > +1 for Apache Maven > >> > >> > >> Ditto but this can happen any time and in parallel. I understand and > >> appreciate the time limitations for the 4.0 release. > >> > >> > >> > (but I agree my POV can be considered non objective :-) > >> > ) or at least our own Apache dogfood. > >> > I agree this can late for 4.0 (why not for 4.1) Btw if someone push > >> > poc on a branch I can help to review as I have a bit of experience > >> > on (and Brett too :-) ). > >> > > >> > >> I'm not a Maven demigod like Brett, but I can help out here as well. > >> > >> > >> > > >> > Olivier > >> > Le 16 août 2012 23:12, "David Nalley" <da...@gnsa.us> a écrit : > >> > > >> > > Hi folks, > >> > > > >> > > I am particularly limiting the scope of this to what we do for > >> > > 4.0, since that is the pressing timeline. > >> > > > >> > > Here are the current options: > >> > > > >> > > * Continue using ant, and have the hacky stuff I wrote as ant > >> > > targets deal with dependency resolution. (see the differences in > >> > > the deps-ctrl > >> > > branch) > >> > > > >> > > * Use Gradle (see the gradle branch) > >> > > > >> > > * Use Maven (I haven't seen any of this, but Darren reports that > >> > > he has this building - Darren: can we see this somewhere publicly > >> > > perhaps?) > >> > > > >> > > While I'd like to have us choose the system that we are going to > >> > > use for all time (and despite some reservations, I think Maven is > >> > > likely my personal choice for what we should move to long term), > >> > > I am also concerned that we don't let the perfect become the enemy > of the good. > >> > > So given all of that - what should our choice be? > >> > > > >> > > --David > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Best Regards, > >> -- Alex
