On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1 for Apache Maven Ditto but this can happen any time and in parallel. I understand and appreciate the time limitations for the 4.0 release. > (but I agree my POV can be considered non objective :-) > ) or at least our own Apache dogfood. > I agree this can late for 4.0 (why not for 4.1) > Btw if someone push poc on a branch I can help to review as I have a bit of > experience on (and Brett too :-) ). > I'm not a Maven demigod like Brett, but I can help out here as well. > > Olivier > Le 16 août 2012 23:12, "David Nalley" <da...@gnsa.us> a écrit : > > > Hi folks, > > > > I am particularly limiting the scope of this to what we do for 4.0, > > since that is the pressing timeline. > > > > Here are the current options: > > > > * Continue using ant, and have the hacky stuff I wrote as ant targets > > deal with dependency resolution. (see the differences in the deps-ctrl > > branch) > > > > * Use Gradle (see the gradle branch) > > > > * Use Maven (I haven't seen any of this, but Darren reports that he > > has this building - Darren: can we see this somewhere publicly > > perhaps?) > > > > While I'd like to have us choose the system that we are going to use > > for all time (and despite some reservations, I think Maven is likely > > my personal choice for what we should move to long term), I am also > > concerned that we don't let the perfect become the enemy of the good. > > So given all of that - what should our choice be? > > > > --David > > > -- Best Regards, -- Alex
