+1 for Apache Maven (but I agree my POV can be considered non objective :-) ) or at least our own Apache dogfood. I agree this can late for 4.0 (why not for 4.1) Btw if someone push poc on a branch I can help to review as I have a bit of experience on (and Brett too :-) ).
-- Olivier Le 16 août 2012 23:12, "David Nalley" <da...@gnsa.us> a écrit : > Hi folks, > > I am particularly limiting the scope of this to what we do for 4.0, > since that is the pressing timeline. > > Here are the current options: > > * Continue using ant, and have the hacky stuff I wrote as ant targets > deal with dependency resolution. (see the differences in the deps-ctrl > branch) > > * Use Gradle (see the gradle branch) > > * Use Maven (I haven't seen any of this, but Darren reports that he > has this building - Darren: can we see this somewhere publicly > perhaps?) > > While I'd like to have us choose the system that we are going to use > for all time (and despite some reservations, I think Maven is likely > my personal choice for what we should move to long term), I am also > concerned that we don't let the perfect become the enemy of the good. > So given all of that - what should our choice be? > > --David >