---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/7594/#review17902
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- anthony xu
On Feb. 27, 2013, 9:29 a.m
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9894/#review17809
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- anthony xu
On March 13, 2013, 8:32 a.m
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9730/#review17736
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- anthony xu
On March 6, 2013, 12:45 p.m
om OVS mode to bridge mode because iptables doesn't work with
OVS.
Thanks,
Anthony
> -Original Message-
> From: Chiradeep Vittal
> Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2013 3:18 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: Anthony Xu
> Subject: Re: Securit
leted after you shutdown VM through
xencenter?
- I didn't see the change for KVM, is this feature only for XS.
- anthony xu
On March 4, 2013, 1:18 p.m., Jayapal Reddy wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-ma
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1462?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Anthony Xu reassigned CLOUDSTACK-1462:
--
Assignee: Rohit Yadav (was: Anthony Xu)
> Used Master Branch System
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1462?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13590891#comment-13590891
]
Anthony Xu commented on CLOUDSTACK-1462:
First we should test syste
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1462?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Anthony Xu resolved CLOUDSTACK-1462.
Resolution: Fixed
The template was broken
[root@nfs2 secondary]# ./vhd-util read -p
It should apply to all XerServer and XCP,
Anthony
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 1:19 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: Anthony Xu
> Subject: Re: MEMORY_CONSTRAINT_VIOL
I have plan to add isolated and shared networks to SG enabled zone in 4.2, the
service providers on these network will be supported in SG enabled zone, but as
for SG enabled shared network, current plan is only support Virtual Router as
service provider. If you want to add other service provider
0
> 2013-02-14 10:53:39,877 WARN
> [network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
> (RouterStatusMonitor-1:null) Unable to update router r-18165-VM's VPN
> connection status
> 2013-02-14 10:53:39,879 DEBUG [agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache]
> (DirectAgent-20:null) Seq 14-
Do you reboot VR through CloudStack UI or through hypervisor directly or inside
VR?
Only reboot VR through CloudStack UI/API will trigger CloudStack to hot plug
tier's NICs and reapply all rules
Anthony
> -Original Message-
> From: benoit lair [mailto:kurushi4...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wedn
Strange , I didn't see any mock in SecurityGroupManagerImpl2Test.java, in
SecurityGroupManagerTestContext.xml?
Anthony
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Huang
> Sent: Monday, February 11, 2013 5:36 PM
> To: Alex Huang; Anthony Xu; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
&
Is there any example in Cloudstack?
Anthony
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Huang
> Sent: Monday, February 11, 2013 4:22 PM
> To: Anthony Xu; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: how to write Unit test which requires DB setup
>
> Mock your db acces
Try this,
- stop management server
- null out mgmt_server_id for hosts in host table
- start management server
Anthony
> -Original Message-
> From: Caleb Call [mailto:cc...@overstock.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 11, 2013 2:48 PM
> To:
> Cc: Caleb Call; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.
Hi all,
I'm trying to write some unit tests for network manager, I believe DB setup is
needed and some pre-test DB initial entries are also needed. Is there any unit
test frame work to setup DB and populate some initial data into DB before
launching the unit test? Or is there other way to mock
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1220?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13575002#comment-13575002
]
Anthony Xu commented on CLOUDSTACK-1220:
can you check if existing VM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1218?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13574990#comment-13574990
]
Anthony Xu commented on CLOUDSTACK-1218:
does network restart stop all
start one.
Anthony
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 08, 2013 1:38 PM
> To: Anthony Xu
> Cc: 'David Nalley'; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [MERGE] Security Group in Adva
So we changed the criteria for merge, should we post a formal document for the
criteria? In case someone is not aware of that.
Anthony
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 08, 2013 12:52 PM
> To: Anthony Xu
I checked in a build fix 5 minutes ago, I can build now.
Anthony
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 08, 2013 12:48 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Master is out of licensing compliance (WAS:
> [j
unit test for those
managers may scare them away.
Anthony
> -Original Message-
> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
> Sent: Friday, February 08, 2013 12:35 PM
> To: Anthony Xu
> Cc: Chip Childers; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [MERGE]
Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 08, 2013 12:19 PM
> To: Anthony Xu
> Cc: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [MERGE] Security Group in Advanced zone
>
> On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 11:43:52AM -0800, Ant
e, what's the next step? Call for vote, or Call for review?
Thanks,
Anthony
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 08, 2013 11:20 AM
> To: Anthony Xu
> Cc: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subjec
+1
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 08, 2013 11:09 AM
> To: Alex Huang
> Cc: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS][INFRA] Setting up gerrit
>
> On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 11:06:37AM -0800, Alex Huang
m: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 08, 2013 10:32 AM
> To: Anthony Xu
> Cc: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [MERGE] Security Group in Advanced zone
>
> On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 10:20:45AM -0800, Anthony Xu wrote:
> >
rs [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 08, 2013 7:48 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Anthony Xu
> Subject: Re: [MERGE] Security Group in Advanced zone
>
> On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Chip Childers
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 05, 2013
this SR.
Anthony
From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 10:00 PM
To: Anthony Xu
Cc: Alex Huang; Edison Su; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Marcus Sorensen
Subject: Re: Setting up CloudStack to use XenServer with iSCSI
OK, cool...thanks
Xenserver hosts under one cluster are in one XenServer pool, there is one iscsi
storage repository from xenserver hosts perspective.
Anthony
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 7:26 PM
> To: Alex Huang
> Cc
-1
> -Original Message-
> From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org]
> Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 4:01 PM
> To: Chip Childers; Alex Huang; Brett Porter; Animesh Chaturvedi; David
> Nalley; Edison Su; run...@gmail.com; dk...@apache.org;
> htrippa...@schubergphilis.com; shadow...@gmai
I think direct iscsi access from guest VM probably is faster than virtual disk
in XenServer,
in XenServer, virtual disk is emulated by dom0 application, virtual NIC is
emulated by dom0 Kernel, direct iscsi access basically moves from virtual disk
emulation to virtual NIC emulation.
Anthony
Anthony Xu created CLOUDSTACK-1199:
--
Summary: External DNS not being added to reslov.conf
Key: CLOUDSTACK-1199
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1199
Project: CloudStack
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13572790#comment-13572790
]
Anthony Xu commented on CLOUDSTACK-1107:
There are some code to chec
Anthony Xu created CLOUDSTACK-1167:
--
Summary: arptables rules are not destroyed after vm is stopped in
XenServer in basic zone
Key: CLOUDSTACK-1167
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1167
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-737?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Anthony Xu updated CLOUDSTACK-737:
--
Description:
Requirements described at:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display
I would like to request merge of feature " security group in advanced zone"
CloudStack had this feature before, but didn't support /maintain it for a
while, this one enables this feature and extends this feature, below is the
summary
- re-enable SG for KVM in advanced zone
- add SG support fo
one.
later, we may support both of them in one setup.
Anthony
From: Mice Xia [mailto:mice_...@tcloudcomputing.com]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2013 5:30 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Alex Huang; Mice Xia; Anthony Xu
Subject: 答复: [MERGE] Support VM Snapshot
Anthony,
Thanks
ne is
supported in a zone, volume snapshot or vm snapshot.
Anthony
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Huang
> Sent: Friday, February 01, 2013 10:54 AM
> To: Mice Xia; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: Anthony Xu
> Subject: RE: [MERGE] Support VM Snapshot
That's a bad/quick fix for http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15922
Delete account will expunge all VMs for this account immediate , if
expunge.interval is too short , VM GC may kick in, then two threads are trying
to expunge the same VMs, which causes expunge fail.
I think you can remove the
-Remove host tag on each host by executing
xe host-parameter-remove param-name=tags host-uuid=
-Restart management server
Anthony
> -Original Message-
> From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 9:00 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> S
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-737?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Anthony Xu updated CLOUDSTACK-737:
--
Description:
Requirements described at:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-737?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Anthony Xu updated CLOUDSTACK-737:
--
Description:
Requirements described at:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-737?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13561241#comment-13561241
]
Anthony Xu commented on CLOUDSTACK-737:
---
[anthony@CLOUD-ANTHONY incub
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-737?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Anthony Xu updated CLOUDSTACK-737:
--
Description:
Requirements described at:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1043?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13561055#comment-13561055
]
Anthony Xu commented on CLOUDSTACK-1043:
The limitation that VM cannot b
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1043?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13560957#comment-13560957
]
Anthony Xu commented on CLOUDSTACK-1043:
As for Security Groups, CS h
ecurityGroups" - i.e. add an optional
> parameter "nicid" to allow a query for the set of NICs associated with
> a given NIC. Other than that I don't think the Security Group Platform
> API needs to change, unless I am missing something.
>
> I will update the spe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1043?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13560850#comment-13560850
]
Anthony Xu commented on CLOUDSTACK-1043:
Hi Simon,
I'm glad t
Hi Simon,
I'm glad to see ENI feature in CloudStack, I do have some questions,
createNic,
it actually allocates IP, should CS limit the number of NIC an account can
create to avoid one account use too many IP?
attachNic,
can a NIC be attached to any VM, or only VM in the same network with N
f
> * ACL accept
> * ACL deny
> * instance-based SG
> * nic based SG
>
> On 1/18/13 9:50 AM, "Anthony Xu" wrote:
>
> >Thanks for comments,
> >It is nice to have security group in NIC level
> >checked AWS, which is implemented with Elastic Network Inte
Should we use service_id, provider_id instead?
Anthony
> -Original Message-
> From: Frank Zhang [mailto:frank.zh...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 4:21 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: take a look at your foreign key, it may exceed mysql limtion
>
> S
It is not easy to sync/maintain the account information in several regions.
Is it possible to have a separate account service, cloudstack management
servers in multiple region can consult ?
Anthony
> -Original Message-
> From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com]
> Sent:
I see
> -Original Message-
> From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org]
> Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 12:17 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] IPv6 support draft functional spec(phase 1)
>
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 11:48 AM
Dual stack in user VM or router VM?
router VM must have dual stack because link-local is still ipv4, right?
Anthony
> -Original Message-
> From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org]
> Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 11:13 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUS
cipation level. A VM can have
> >networks with SG and without at the same time. If that's the case this
> >feature proposal just got more awesome!
> >
> >-kd
> >
> >
> >>-Original Message-
> >>From: Anthony Xu [mailto:xuefei...@citri
h root disk has a copy of the base
> disk in the
> > destination storage pool. Is this an issue?
> Waste space(each disk will have its own base disk, instead of sharing),
> and base disk clean up will be an issue(as there is no cloudstack db
> entry to track this new base dis
Hi Marcus,
I didn't realize the rp_filter issue when I worked on VPC feature, thanks for
the fix.
With the fix , guest NIC is with rp_filter on, public NIC is with rp_filter
off, that's correct. But seems eth0 ( link local) is with rp_filter off, which
is supposed to be on, this is very trivia
support draft functional spec(phase 1)
>
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Anthony Xu
> wrote:
> > My misunderstanding, I thought that's the link-local ip in Xenserver
> or KVM:-)
> >
> > If a VM is on both IPv6 and IPv4 network, what's the link-local
> a
uary 17, 2013 10:13 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] IPv6 support draft functional spec(phase 1)
>
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Anthony Xu
> wrote:
> > Thanks for the write-up,
> >
> > One comment,
> > Is there an
Thanks for the write-up,
One comment,
Is there any reason not use link-local IPv4 address?
>*User VM would have one link-local IPv6 address
> -Original Message-
> From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 7:11 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.
nce: CLOUDSTACK-737] support security group
> enabled network in advanced zone
>
> Anthony the patch you link that you specified is just a jira link.
> Please provide correct patch link. You can put in your
> people.apache.org space.
>
> Thanks
> Animesh
>
> >
; Got it,
>
> So we are still only talking about SG on advanced shared networks.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> -kd
>
>
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Anthony Xu [mailto:xuefei...@citrix.com]
> >Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 5:11 PM
> >To: cl
]
> >Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 1:36 PM
> >To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Security Groups Isolation in Advanced Zone
> >
> >Folks please pass on comments if any, otherwise it is assumed that the
> spec
> is
> >approved by the commu
Hi folks,
I'd like to start the IP clearance process for the Citrix feature - support
security group enabled network in advanced zone
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-737
Citrix would like to donate this feature to Apache CloudStack,
In 4.0, security group is only supported in
Anthony Xu created CLOUDSTACK-983:
-
Summary: default Security rule doesn't apply to system VMs
Key: CLOUDSTACK-983
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-983
Project: Cloud
Thanks for bringing this up,
For security group, we may need to handle following things,
As you mentioned,
Anti-spoofing rules need to be updated, when secondary IP is
associate/dissociate to NIC.
And
Security group rule can base on cidr and it can base on account/security group,
For example a
Anthony Xu created CLOUDSTACK-982:
-
Summary: multiple VLAN/multiple subnets doesn't work
Key: CLOUDSTACK-982
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-982
Project: Cloud
Does anyone happen to know the reason for this build failure?
Mvn -e install
[INFO] Copying 1 resource
[INFO] Copying 3 resources
[INFO] [compiler:compile {execution: default-compile}]
[INFO] Compiling 149 source files to
/home/anthony/vmops/incubator-cloudstack/utils/target/classes
[INFO]
t: Re: [DISCUSS] Security Groups Isolation in Advanced Zone
>
> Hi Anthony,
>
> Understood - thanks for the update.
>
> Dave.
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 2:54 AM, Anthony Xu
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Dave,
> >
> > For 4.1 , this feature is only for
Hi Dave,
For 4.1 , this feature is only for shared network on advanced zone, both
XenServer and KVM are supported.
Will upgrade FS soon.
Anthony
> -Original Message-
> From: Dave Cahill [mailto:dcah...@midokura.jp]
> Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 12:33 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incub
Hi Kishan,
It's nice to have region feature, I have some questions though.
>Snapshots also should be available to all zones within a Region. CS currently
>stores snapshots in secondary storage. Snapshots should instead be stored in
>the object-store
Does this mean object-store is a requirement
I assume clone is a kind of snapshot in the term of VHD chain,
Does XenMotion has same restrictions on clone?
For fast provision, right now , on XenServer, root disk is cloned from template.
Before any snapshot, root disk is already a VHD with parent VHD which is
template, do you know if this has
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-787?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13544308#comment-13544308
]
Anthony Xu commented on CLOUDSTACK-787:
---
FS
https://cwiki.apache
Anthony Xu created CLOUDSTACK-690:
-
Summary: add SG on Advanced Zone shared network
Key: CLOUDSTACK-690
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-690
Project: CloudStack
Issue
Some questions,
Will CS support IPv6 in basic zone/network?
Does that mean CS support both host and guest IPv6 in 4.1?
Anthony
> -Original Message-
> From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org]
> Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 1:02 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject
Linked clone is fast, it can decrease the VM provision time.
Full clone improves disk access performance.
Not share if VMware provide API to convert linked clone to full clone?
If yes, should we consider following?
Virtual disk starts with linked clone( fast VM/Disk provision).
Convert linked clo
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 11:18 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: cloudstack-us...@incubator.apache.org; Anthony Xu
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Dedicated Resources: Dedicate Pods, Clusters,
> Hosts to a domain
>
> Hi Anthony,
>
> My thinking is that
oreign UUID
> columns for all the tables through cross reference in upgrade, also
> need
> to consider adding code to set those foreign UUID columns in fresh
> install
> case. This scope may be too big to complete in 4.1 release.
>
> Thanks
> -min
>
> On 12/19/12 10:52 P
in these tables so that we can fetch those UUIDs in sort of batch
> mode
> while searching for objects to alleviate this effect.
>
> Thanks
> -min
>
>
>
> On 12/19/12 10:41 PM, "Anthony Xu" wrote:
>
> >If foreign key object is not needed, only for
instead of
> currently
> querying them again during response serialization phase. For those more
> costly list APIs, for example, listVms, we will create DB views to join
> those uuids in the view to get them through one db view query.
>
> Thanks
> -min
>
> On 12/19/12 10:20
> In this feature
> - Root Admin should be able to dedicate a pod/cluster/host to a
> particular domain or sub-domain.
How about primary storage? Can PS be dedicated to a domain?
Can an account have dedicated resource?
> - If there is no available resources in the dedicated pod/cluster/host,
>
> Thanks
> -min
>
> On 12/19/12 10:07 PM, "Anthony Xu" wrote:
>
> >>2. The API layer provides a translation from the UUID to the
> internal
> >>DB_ID to the DB entity, but this translation is done internally.
> Outside
> >>users will never
>2. The API layer provides a translation from the UUID to the internal
>DB_ID to the DB entity, but this translation is done internally. Outside users
>will never see DB_ID. Before the response is sending back by CS, API layer
>replaces the internal DB_ID with the UUID.
I thought ID->UUID
Since we have upgrade java/script for each release, can we make upgrade
java/script read only in GIT after release?
Anthony
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 4:49 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subj
If it is XenServer, traffic labels are not necessary in Basic networking mode,
since there is only NIC/BONDing being used,
And which is XS management interface, CS will find it.
Anthony
> -Original Message-
> From: Anthony Xu
> Sent: Friday, December 14, 2012 3:10 PM
> To
No VLAN tags in basic network,
Anthony
> -Original Message-
> From: Ahmad Emneina [mailto:ahmad.emne...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Friday, December 14, 2012 2:54 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: SSVM Network Configuration Issue
>
> On 12/6/12 10:03 AM, "John Burwell"
ent systemvm uses GRUB-legacy since XS 5.6 only supported
> GRUB-legacy, but it might be time to move on.
>
> A more suitable systemvm build script might be based on veewee/vagrant,
> along with qemu-img to do the final conversion to vhd/qcow2
>
> --
> Chiradeep
>
>
32-bit PV might have better performance than 64-bit PV on XEN,
In 64 bit mode, there are only ring 0 and ring 3, both Guest OS and guest
application are running on ring3 , application system call needs to be trapped
into hypervisor and then be injected into guest OS.
In 32 bit mode, there are ri
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-585?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13510824#comment-13510824
]
Anthony Xu commented on CLOUDSTACK-585:
---
Wolfram,
Could you please chec
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-587
I filed the bug and fixed it.
Anthony
> -Original Message-
> From: Anthony Xu
> Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2012 11:29 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev
> Subject: RE: MEMORY_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATIONMemory limits must satisfy:
Anthony Xu created CLOUDSTACK-587:
-
Summary: MEMORY_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATIONMemory limits must satisfy:
Key: CLOUDSTACK-587
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-587
Project: CloudStack
Hi Charles,
This is a bug, have you filed a bug for this?
Anthony
> -Original Message-
> From: Charles Moulliard [mailto:ch0...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2012 8:52 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev
> Subject: Fwd: MEMORY_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATIONMemory limits must satisfy:
>
> Hi,
>
>
CS used to have Fedora 8 as system VM.
The reason CS moves to Debian is,
1.Debian 6 has iptable checksum module
2.Debian 6 is stable
If CentOS 6.* has iptable checksum module.
I think you can.
Anthony
> -Original Message-
> From: Donal Lafferty [mailto:donal.laffe...@citrix.com]
> Sent:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-585?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13510653#comment-13510653
]
Anthony Xu commented on CLOUDSTACK-585:
---
Why not, I see it as a fix. It&#x
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-585?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13510639#comment-13510639
]
Anthony Xu commented on CLOUDSTACK-585:
---
I can reproduce the issue with &q
Hi join,
Try following,
Set global configuration management.network.cidr to your management server
CIDR, if this configuration is not available in UI, you can change it in DB
directly.
Restart management,
Stop/Start SSVM and CPVM.
And could you post "cat /proc/cmdline" in SSVM?
Anthony
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-585?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13510614#comment-13510614
]
Anthony Xu commented on CLOUDSTACK-585:
---
Hi wolfram,
I can't repr
L_GW dev eth1" from cloud-early-config
>
> Once I commented that part out - everything is working fine..
>
> What is the point of adding this extra route - if external routing
> handles that by default?
>
> In my case - the "route add" created ARP issues.
>
&
ng the local gateways and I can see that happening when
> router VM boots up.
>
> But the fix is to ping either CS Core or CS gateway - that truly
> addresses the issue.
>
> Any thoughts of how I can create this behavior in reproducible fashion
> for all new routers?
I remember we have a fix for this, when route VM boots up, it tries to ping
default gateway to propagate its MAC to switch.
Might be this fix is not checked into CS 4.0
Anthony
> -Original Message-
> From: Musayev, Ilya [mailto:imusa...@webmd.net]
> Sent: Monday, December 03, 2012 10:59
1 - 100 of 183 matches
Mail list logo
