[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1196?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13574306#comment-13574306
]
Pradeep Soundararajan commented on CLOUDSTACK-1196:
---
Are you sure c
Sailaja Mada created CLOUDSTACK-1208:
Summary: Restart network failed with cleanup=true
Key: CLOUDSTACK-1208
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1208
Project: CloudStack
+1 (binding)
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 08, 2013 5:22 AM
> To: Sheng Yang; Chip Childers; Brett Porter; Animesh Chaturvedi; David
> Nalley; Edison Su; run...@gmail.com; dk...@apache.org; Hugo Trippaers;
> shadow...@gmail
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1196?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Pradeep Soundararajan reassigned CLOUDSTACK-1196:
-
Assignee: Pradeep Soundararajan
> Unable to login throug
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9361/
---
(Updated Feb. 8, 2013, 7:48 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Alex Huang.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-684?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mice Xia updated CLOUDSTACK-684:
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.1.0)
4.2.0
> Support VM Snapshot
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-531?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13574300#comment-13574300
]
Guillaume Fraysse commented on CLOUDSTACK-531:
--
We encountered the same i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13574299#comment-13574299
]
Rayees Namathponnan commented on CLOUDSTACK-1206:
-
similar issue repo
Can you respond or update the Jira ticket ?
On 06/02/13 9:30 AM, "Abhinandan Prateek"
mailto:abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com>> wrote:
Nitin,
Can you update the jira ticket
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-658
with the progress for this feature ?
-abhi
Please, try to close on reviews and corresponding changes that are pending in
review board. Following are some of the items requiring attention:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9156/ No activity on Cloustack-711: Cpu and ram
overcommit at cluster level: Bharat/Nitin, please respond.
https://rev
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1207?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Saksham Srivastava updated CLOUDSTACK-1207:
---
Assignee: Likitha Shetty
> updateNetwork API fails with NPE if the
Saksham Srivastava created CLOUDSTACK-1207:
--
Summary: updateNetwork API fails with NPE if the network is in
implemented state
Key: CLOUDSTACK-1207
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-12
Great...thanks for that info, Anthony!
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 11:04 PM, Anthony Xu wrote:
> In XenServer pool, there is one master host, the rest are slave host,
> CloudStack only talks to master host, when set up SR, CloudStack tells
> master host to create a shared SR, master host will ask e
In XenServer pool, there is one master host, the rest are slave host,
CloudStack only talks to master host, when set up SR, CloudStack tells master
host to create a shared SR, master host will ask every slave to create
connection to iscsi server, then every host in this XenServer pool can see
OK, cool...thanks for that info, Anthony.
When CloudStack sets up the storage repository, does it just pick any
XenServer host and that XenServer host communicates the info to its peers?
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 10:48 PM, Anthony Xu wrote:
> Xenserver hosts under one cluster are in one XenServer
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1175?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13574280#comment-13574280
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-1175:
-
We found the right fix for this bug, the root cause is that we have
multiple beans defined for ApiRateLimitServiceImpl, causing that
ApiServer.apiAccessCheckers are injected with 3 instances of
ApiRateLimitServiceImpl. Reverted Rohit's commit, and fixed the bug
through commit 3ce7531d2b9b1ec0bc4bf2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1175?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Min Chen resolved CLOUDSTACK-1175.
--
Resolution: Fixed
> Only default Root admin is allowed to login Management Server
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1175?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13574276#comment-13574276
]
Min Chen commented on CLOUDSTACK-1175:
--
The real cause for NPE of _store in ApiR
Xenserver hosts under one cluster are in one XenServer pool, there is one iscsi
storage repository from xenserver hosts perspective.
Anthony
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 7:26 PM
> To: Alex Huang
> Cc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1175?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13574272#comment-13574272
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-1175:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1175?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13574272#comment-13574272
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-1175:
-
I am able to package rpm successfully now. Thank you very much.
Apart from the packaging directory is there any way could you please get us the
list of files/scripts/commits touched for this to update from cloud* to
cloudstack*. Example: python/lib/cloudutils/serviceConfig.py,
serviceConfigSer
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1116?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Likitha Shetty resolved CLOUDSTACK-1116.
Resolution: Fixed
> [EC2 Query API] Support for ModifyImageAttribute and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1118?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Likitha Shetty resolved CLOUDSTACK-1118.
Resolution: Fixed
> [EC2 Query API] Add filter support for EC2DescribeAvai
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1119?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Likitha Shetty resolved CLOUDSTACK-1119.
Resolution: Fixed
> [EC2 Query API] Add filter support for EC2DecsribeAddr
I'm okay either way. The only reason why I raised the issue was because I
believe the original discussion did not conclude with it's ok to strip the
reply-to header.
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org]
> Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 4:01 PM
> T
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sheng Yang resolved CLOUDSTACK-1141.
Resolution: Fixed
> Ipv6 - After network restart (and reboot router) , we do not s
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13574226#comment-13574226
]
Sheng Yang commented on CLOUDSTACK-1141:
You need to run dhclient again to ge
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rayees Namathponnan updated CLOUDSTACK-1206:
Priority: Blocker (was: Major)
> Failure in Copy of System templa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rayees Namathponnan updated CLOUDSTACK-1206:
Assignee: Hugo Trippaers
> Failure in Copy of System templates
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rayees Namathponnan updated CLOUDSTACK-1206:
Description:
Step 1 : Created new build from 4.1 branch
Step 2 : Inst
Rayees Namathponnan created CLOUDSTACK-1206:
---
Summary: Failure in Copy of System templates
Key: CLOUDSTACK-1206
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1206
Project: CloudStack
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 7:46 PM
> To: David Nalley
> Cc: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [DISCUSS] Binary downloads
>
> >
> > Because providing 'binaries' isn't necessarily problematic,
+1 the old way
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 7:55 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 04:00:46PM -0800, Sheng Yang wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'd like to call for a vote for reverting back to the old mailing list
>> mechanism, which would add "Reply-To: mailing list" to every mail it
>> send
>
> Because providing 'binaries' isn't necessarily problematic, but making
> yum and apt repos work in the ASF mirror system seems a bit more of an
> issue. Plus, Wido stepped up to do the work, no one else has offered
> any other alternatives.
>
David,
I apologize if this has all been discussed
Sangeetha Hariharan created CLOUDSTACK-1205:
---
Summary: Ipv6 - Ubuntu 12.10 guest Vms looses default route (after
it expiration time ~ 30 mts) when ipv6.autoconfig parameters are disabled
except for net.ipv6.conf.lo.autoconf which is en
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1204?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
angeline shen updated CLOUDSTACK-1204:
--
Attachment: management-server.log.gz
> Fail to create advance zone due to fail
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1204?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
angeline shen updated CLOUDSTACK-1204:
--
Attachment: Screenshot-CloudStack - Mozilla Firefox.png
> Fail to create advan
angeline shen created CLOUDSTACK-1204:
-
Summary: Fail to create advance zone due to fail to add host
Key: CLOUDSTACK-1204
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1204
Project: CloudSt
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 8:46 AM, Chiradeep Vittal
wrote:
> I undid your fix :) to leave it modular.
:) I made it thinking would be easier to hack only one postinstall.sh
script. Pl. also backport to 4.1 (CLOUDSTACK-1066's fix version is
4.1, though in cfg files we use version 4.2?) so we are in sy
> On Feb. 1, 2013, 9:50 a.m., Koushik Das wrote:
> > There is another config parameter instance.name based on which a fixed
> > suffix is appended to the internal name. What happens to this parameter in
> > the context of this fix? Also as part of this fix you are allowing to
> > suffix the di
Can I ask you guys a related question?
When I tried to set up my iSCSI-based Primary Storage for my XenServer
Cluster, I only had one XenServer in the Cluster.
What does CloudStack do from a storage repository standpoint if there are
multiple XenServers in the Cluster? Do they each get a new sto
On Feb 7, 2013 7:11 PM, "David Nalley" wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 8:11 PM, Marcus Sorensen
wrote:
> > Even though I don't feel strongly about this functionality, the way
> > the vote itself was presented bothers me. Clearly, if you want an
> > email thread to be treated as a public topic t
I undid your fix :) to leave it modular.
It still builds with the hostname as 'ahha' -- I can't figure out why.
What is left:
Openswan requires interactive input to install. Previously we had a
pre-baked config.dat that fed into pkg-configure to supply canned
responses. Somehow this needs to be c
Thanks Chip. I added some shell scripts in the systemvmtemplate directory
-- not sure if you want to add the header to each or leave it to the
LICENSE file
On 2/7/13 12:58 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
>On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 06:47:28PM -0800, Chiradeep Vittal wrote:
>> It is confusing -- gaah.
>>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1066?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13574201#comment-13574201
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-1066:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1066?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13574198#comment-13574198
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-1066:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1066?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13574199#comment-13574199
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-1066:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1066?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13574197#comment-13574197
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-1066:
-
Interesting idea, Marcus.
The hard part is in guaranteeing CSPs the IOPS they selected...especially
if they've written SLAs for their customers around said performance.
It all comes down to the "Noisy Neighbor" problem: If you have multiple
VMs running on the same volume, any one of them can - a
Sonny,
I agree with you, the CS design is very good and keeping it in line with
incubating site - would be even better.
Thanks for the awesome work, can't wait to see it.
Ilya
-Original Message-
From: Sonny Chhen [mailto:sonny.ch...@citrix.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 7:14 P
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1196?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13574194#comment-13574194
]
Srikanteswararao Talluri commented on CLOUDSTACK-1196:
--
Yes, i r
Hey Alex,
Thanks for your input!
Let me make sure we're on the same page from a terminology standpoint.
When I refer to a volume, that is equivalent to a LUN. Creating a
SolidFire volume gets you an IQN referring to LUN 0.
It is definitely true that SolidFire would love to be able to service a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1202?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
angeline shen closed CLOUDSTACK-1202.
-
> Fail to install KVM cloud-agent
> ---
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1202?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
angeline shen resolved CLOUDSTACK-1202.
---
Resolution: Won't Fix
workaround available. close bug
> Fail t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1203?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
angeline shen updated CLOUDSTACK-1203:
--
Attachment: management-server.log.gz
> Fail to create advance zone with SG en
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1203?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
angeline shen updated CLOUDSTACK-1203:
--
Attachment: Screenshot-The page-1.png
> Fail to create advance zone with SG e
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 04:00:46PM -0800, Sheng Yang wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'd like to call for a vote for reverting back to the old mailing list
>> mechanism, which would add "Reply-To: mailing list" to every mail it
>> send out.
>
> +1 (bi
angeline shen created CLOUDSTACK-1203:
-
Summary: Fail to create advance zone with SG enabled when UI
allows SG enabled option
Key: CLOUDSTACK-1203
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1203
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1119?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13574183#comment-13574183
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-1119:
-
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9220/#review16324
---
Ship it!
Reviewed. Commit hash: 2364ada4df2543c75d5a569de73a83f4a23
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1119?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13574182#comment-13574182
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-1119:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1118?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13574179#comment-13574179
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-1118:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1117?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13574180#comment-13574180
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-1117:
-
On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 04:00:46PM -0800, Sheng Yang wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to call for a vote for reverting back to the old mailing list
> mechanism, which would add "Reply-To: mailing list" to every mail it
> send out.
+1 (binding)
Point of order question:
I'd like to ask exactly which
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 9:19 PM, Ravi Shankar wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have successfully installed CloudStack 4.0 following the steps given in
> the documentation. All the services are also started smoothly. But I am
> unable to login into the UI. As per the log files, there's no error except
> in th
Hi All,
I have successfully installed CloudStack 4.0 following the steps given in
the documentation. All the services are also started smoothly. But I am
unable to login into the UI. As per the log files, there's no error except
in the log file lcoalhost.-date.log which I am attaching with this ma
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 6:10 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 8:11 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
>> Even though I don't feel strongly about this functionality, the way
>> the vote itself was presented bothers me. Clearly, if you want an
>> email thread to be treated as a public topic
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9218/#review16320
---
Ship it!
Good to have filters on the API.
Commit hash:b5e28038c
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 8:14 PM, Jessica Tomechak
wrote:
> I've noticed quite a few bugs against documentation are being filed without
> the Component field being set to Doc. I rely pretty heavily on that field
> so I can easily query for writing tasks. It's more reliable than querying
> against te
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 8:11 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
> Even though I don't feel strongly about this functionality, the way
> the vote itself was presented bothers me. Clearly, if you want an
> email thread to be treated as a public topic that all responses
> automatically stick to, then you're a
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 5:57 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
> On Feb 7, 2013 6:57 PM, "Marcus Sorensen" wrote:
>>
>> My point is that the vote was framed such that if you vote +1 then you 1)
>> don't trust people 2) want to be like the soviet union and take away
>> people's freedom. It just seems a bi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1118?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13574163#comment-13574163
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-1118:
-
On Feb 7, 2013 6:57 PM, "Marcus Sorensen" wrote:
> My point is that the vote was framed such that if you vote +1 then you 1)
> don't trust people 2) want to be like the soviet union and take away
> people's freedom. It just seems a bit unfair to start a vote that way.
>
> I get that someone might
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1202?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13574159#comment-13574159
]
Rayees Namathponnan commented on CLOUDSTACK-1202:
-
Works around for t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1117?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13574157#comment-13574157
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-1117:
-
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9215/#review16316
---
Ship it!
Fix is correct. Commit hash:12ad296b6c323f017f2fdbeb1e9
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1116?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13574155#comment-13574155
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-1116:
-
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
> Even though I don't feel strongly about this functionality, the way
> the vote itself was presented bothers me. Clearly, if you want an
> email thread to be treated as a public topic that all responses
> automatically stick to, then you're a
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9213/#review16314
---
Ship it!
Looks good. Committed with Commit hash: 4e4edc9e42f69b10314
angeline shen created CLOUDSTACK-1202:
-
Summary: Fail to install KVM cloud-agent
Key: CLOUDSTACK-1202
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1202
Project: CloudStack
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1116?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13574143#comment-13574143
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-1116:
-
+1
On 2/7/13 4:00 PM, "Sheng Yang" wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I'd like to call for a vote for reverting back to the old mailing list
>mechanism, which would add "Reply-To: mailing list" to every mail it
>send out.
>
>And I need to declare that I would vote *-1* on this revert.
>
>Whatever you voted in t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jessica Tomechak updated CLOUDSTACK-1001:
-
Component/s: Doc
Summary: Doc - Hyper V Support (was: Doc - Huper V
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sangeetha Hariharan reopened CLOUDSTACK-1141:
-
Tested with the latest build from network refactor branch.
After networ
Even though I don't feel strongly about this functionality, the way
the vote itself was presented bothers me. Clearly, if you want an
email thread to be treated as a public topic that all responses
automatically stick to, then you're a communist and trying to take
away people's freedom. Never mind
Sorry guys:), I changed my mind after reading the whole thread and the
explanation from Alex, better to revert back to old mailing list mechanism.
+1.
From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 4:25 PM
To: Sheng Yang
Cc: Frank Zhang; Brett Porter; w...@wi
Rayees Namathponnan created CLOUDSTACK-1201:
---
Summary: Failed to create ssh key for user "cloud"
/var/lib/cloud/management/.ssh/id_rsa and failed to start management server
Key: CLOUDSTACK-1201
URL: ht
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9182/#review16312
---
Few comments:
1) In Allocators, it would be good to put the logic to
Rayees Namathponnan created CLOUDSTACK-1200:
---
Summary: Unknown column 'vm_instance.disk_offering_id' in table
vm_instance, db exception shown in MS log
Key: CLOUDSTACK-1200
URL: https://issues.apache.org
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
>
> On Feb 7, 2013 5:20 PM, "Alex Huang" wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> > -Original Message-
>> > From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
>> > Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 3:29 PM
>> > To: Mike Tutkowski
>> > Cc: Edison Su; clouds
Nitin,
I didn't think docs.cloudstack.org was the primary storage place for any
design docs. It should contain only stuff from before CloudStack entered
Apache incubation. Before Apache, weren't all the design docs kept on the
Cloud.com / Citrix wiki? If not, and the only copies were on
docs.clouds
On Feb 7, 2013 5:20 PM, "Alex Huang" wrote:
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 3:29 PM
> > To: Mike Tutkowski
> > Cc: Edison Su; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Supporting SolidFire
-1
> -Original Message-
> From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org]
> Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 4:01 PM
> To: Chip Childers; Alex Huang; Brett Porter; Animesh Chaturvedi; David
> Nalley; Edison Su; run...@gmail.com; dk...@apache.org;
> htrippa...@schubergphilis.com; shadow...@gmai
Mike,
One thing you should be aware of is that CloudStack used lvmoiscsi SR for
iscsi. It is not vdi per lun. From your other emails, I think solid fire is
trying to implement vdi/volume per lun. It's very different from CloudStack's
implementation.
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> Fr
I think direct iscsi access from guest VM probably is faster than virtual disk
in XenServer,
in XenServer, virtual disk is emulated by dom0 application, virtual NIC is
emulated by dom0 Kernel, direct iscsi access basically moves from virtual disk
emulation to virtual NIC emulation.
Anthony
*irony* I wonder how many people will reply just to Sheng with their vote :)
I don't really care about the RFC violation, I don't think there's any
reason to be compelled to adhere to it just for the sake of sticking to a
standard.
I would prefer that conversations that begin on-list stay on-list
> -Original Message-
> From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 3:29 PM
> To: Mike Tutkowski
> Cc: Edison Su; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Supporting SolidFire QoS Before 4.2
>
> He's saying that the VM can connect via i
Hey Ilya,
I'm playing around with redesigning the current incubation site for people who
are onboarding or want to learn about CloudStack for the first time. I'll send
out a design proposal and plan on discussing this with Joe, Mark, David as to
how we can get this off the ground. CloudStack h
1 - 100 of 264 matches
Mail list logo
