Mike, One thing you should be aware of is that CloudStack used lvmoiscsi SR for iscsi. It is not vdi per lun. From your other emails, I think solid fire is trying to implement vdi/volume per lun. It's very different from CloudStack's implementation.
--Alex > -----Original Message----- > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] > Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 3:15 PM > To: Edison Su > Cc: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Marcus Sorensen > Subject: Re: Setting up CloudStack to use XenServer with iSCSI > > OK, thanks...I can fetch the latest. > > > On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Edison Su <edison...@citrix.com> wrote: > > > It should work, maybe you can try the latest code in storage_refactor > > branch.**** > > > > ** ** > > > > *From:* Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] > > *Sent:* Thursday, February 07, 2013 2:51 PM > > *To:* Edison Su > > *Cc:* cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Marcus Sorensen > > *Subject:* Re: Setting up CloudStack to use XenServer with iSCSI**** > > > > ** ** > > > > Hey Edison,**** > > > > ** ** > > > > I can't get jetty to run in storage_refactor (admittedly my code is about > > a week out of date). Should jetty be working there now or is this a known > > issue?**** > > > > ** ** > > > > Thanks**** > > > > ** ** > > > > On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Mike Tutkowski < > > mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:**** > > > > Sounds good, Edison...I was under the impression this was a known issue, > > but it sounds like maybe it's not.**** > > > > ** ** > > > > I'll try to reproduce it today.**** > > > > ** ** > > > > Thanks**** > > > > ** ** > > > > On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Edison Su <edison...@citrix.com> > wrote:*** > > * > > > > need error messages, otherwise, I don't know how to debug the > issue...**** > > > > **** > > > > *From:* Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] > > *Sent:* Thursday, February 07, 2013 2:11 PM > > *To:* cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Edison Su; Marcus Sorensen > > *Subject:* Setting up CloudStack to use XenServer with iSCSI**** > > > > **** > > > > Hi everyone,**** > > > > **** > > > > I noticed a while back that when I tried to create iSCSI-based Primary > > Storage for a XenServer Cluster that the operation failed.**** > > > > **** > > > > The way I got around this was to go into XenCenter, create a storage > > repository based on my iSCSI target, and then go into CloudStack and > create > > a PreSetup-based Primary Storage.**** > > > > **** > > > > Does anyone know why I had to take this PreSetup approach for XenServer? > > Is there no way for CloudStack to call into XenServer to do this work for > > me?**** > > > > **** > > > > Thanks! > > **** > > > > **** > > > > -- > > *Mike Tutkowski***** > > > > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.***** > > > > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com**** > > > > o: 303.746.7302**** > > > > Advancing the way the world uses the > cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play> > > *(tm)***** > > > > > > > > **** > > > > ** ** > > > > -- > > *Mike Tutkowski***** > > > > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.***** > > > > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com**** > > > > o: 303.746.7302**** > > > > Advancing the way the world uses the > cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play> > > *(tm)***** > > > > > > > > **** > > > > ** ** > > > > -- > > *Mike Tutkowski***** > > > > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.***** > > > > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com**** > > > > o: 303.746.7302**** > > > > Advancing the way the world uses the > cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play> > > *(tm)***** > > > > > > -- > *Mike Tutkowski* > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com > o: 303.746.7302 > Advancing the way the world uses the > cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play> > *(tm)*
