> -----Original Message----- > From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 3:29 PM > To: Mike Tutkowski > Cc: Edison Su; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: Supporting SolidFire QoS Before 4.2 > > He's saying that the VM can connect via iscsi directly to the > solidfire device, rather than the host. You'd lose more performance > that way and there's more overhead, but it would be a way to give > individual VMs their own solidfire LUN. > Marcus,
I'm interested in your comment here. Why do you think vm having direct iscsi access actually lose performance? I would think it's actually faster because there's nothing translating the raw LUN into a raw disk. --Alex
