I want to simplify the core network manager classes by splitting and
moving code around.
The JIRA bug is here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-740
The proposal is here:
http://s.apache.org/73c
I will be working on a branch (network-refactor) while I wait for comments.
Thanks
-
Does it make sense to introduce the flag(persistent) as part of NetworkOffering?
Thanks,
RamG
> -Original Message-
> From: Likitha Shetty [mailto:likitha.she...@citrix.com]
> Sent: 03 January 2013 18:05
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Persistent Networks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-639?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13543671#comment-13543671
]
Rohit Yadav commented on CLOUDSTACK-639:
Smoke tests on devcloud, all passed n
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rohit Yadav updated CLOUDSTACK-694:
---
Component/s: (was: API)
Network Controller
> Create a new VPC ne
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rohit Yadav updated CLOUDSTACK-694:
---
Component/s: (was: Cloudmonkey)
API
> Create a new VPC network o
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-212?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13543661#comment-13543661
]
Rohit Yadav commented on CLOUDSTACK-212:
I moved a lot of classes org.apache.c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-101?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13543650#comment-13543650
]
Rohit Yadav commented on CLOUDSTACK-101:
Go Prasanna, hack it up!
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 11:37:28AM +0530, Bharat Kumar wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> In cloudstack we specify the vlan ranges in advanced zone. These
> vlans are used while creating the guest networks. Presently we can
> add only one continuos vlan range. There is no way to add non
> contiguous vlan range
Harikrishna Patnala created CLOUDSTACK-745:
--
Summary: Reset a VM on reboot
Key: CLOUDSTACK-745
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-745
Project: CloudStack
Issue Typ
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-744?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasanna Santhanam reassigned CLOUDSTACK-744:
-
Assignee: Prasanna Santhanam
> maven optimization for awsapi - pr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-744?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasanna Santhanam resolved CLOUDSTACK-744.
---
Resolution: Fixed
applied fix to master:
commit 42f3804fbdde7bfe4f3676ef0
> On Jan. 4, 2013, 6:14 a.m., Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> > Ship It!
commit 42f3804fbdde7bfe4f3676ef0c18a54dfe95354c
Author: Noa Resare
Date: Thu Jan 3 15:48:06 2013 +
Work around maven dependency problems
Disable the transitive dependency from axis2-webapp to xercesImpl
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8809/#review15068
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Prasanna Santhanam
On Jan. 3, 2013, 5:46 p.m.
> On Jan. 4, 2013, 5:56 a.m., Likitha Shetty wrote:
> > Verified the build and checked if the jars have any imports that AWSAPI
> > uses. Looks good to me.
Thanks for the reviews. I posted the bug report here :
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-744
- Prasanna
---
Prasanna Santhanam created CLOUDSTACK-744:
-
Summary: maven optimization for awsapi - prevent transitive
dependency and injection of broken repo info
Key: CLOUDSTACK-744
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/
Hi all,
In cloudstack we specify the vlan ranges in advanced zone. These vlans are used
while creating the guest networks. Presently we can add only one continuos
vlan range. There is no way to add non contiguous vlan ranges.
So we propose to add a feature to support adding multiple vlan rang
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8812/
---
Review request for cloudstack, David Nalley, Chip Childers, and Jessica
Tomechak.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8809/#review15066
---
Verified the build and checked if the jars have any imports that AWSA
Congrats Sebastien :)
-Original Message-
From: Likitha Shetty [mailto:likitha.she...@citrix.com]
Sent: Friday, January 4, 2013 9:52 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: New committer: Sebastien Goasguen
Congratulations Sebastien!
> -Original Message-
> From:
Congratulations Sebastien!
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2013 11:23 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: New committer: Sebastien Goasguen
>
> The Podling Project Management Committee (PPMC) f
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-704?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ram Ganesh updated CLOUDSTACK-704:
--
Assignee: Likitha Shetty (was: Devdeep Singh)
> Dedicated Resources - Public IP Addres
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Animesh Chaturvedi updated CLOUDSTACK-671:
--
Assignee: Kelven Yang (was: Fang Wang)
> Volume snapshot enhancements
Congratulations Sebastien!
> -Original Message-
> From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 04, 2013 2:39 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: New committer: Sebastien Goasguen
>
> Thanks Guys, I am pretty excited about this.
>
> -s
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-681?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ram Chinta updated CLOUDSTACK-681:
--
Component/s: Management Server
Fix Version/s: (was: Future)
4.1
Correction the JIRA ticket number is 712 not 772
Animesh
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2012 12:45 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL]Syslog enhancements
>
> Hari,
>
> Please use th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-680?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Animesh Chaturvedi updated CLOUDSTACK-680:
--
Fix Version/s: 4.1.0
> SNMP Alerts support in CloudStack
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-730?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Animesh Chaturvedi updated CLOUDSTACK-730:
--
Assignee: Sheng Yang
> Site-to-Site VPN VR-to-VR
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-703?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Animesh Chaturvedi updated CLOUDSTACK-703:
--
Fix Version/s: 4.1.0
> Site-to-Site VPN 2.0 Enhancements
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-619?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Animesh Chaturvedi updated CLOUDSTACK-619:
--
Assignee: Sonny Chhen
> CloudStack Marketplace
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-600?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13543552#comment-13543552
]
Andrew Bayer commented on CLOUDSTACK-600:
-
One thing I just thought of - the h
Is the requirement to provide security groups functionality on VMWare
using the Cisco VSG?
The Cisco VSG has several capabilities, so clarity would be nice.
On 1/3/13 5:31 PM, "Manan Shah" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I would like to propose a new feature for integrating Cisco ASA 1000v in
>CS 4.1. I have cre
On Wednesday, January 2, 2013, Chip Childers wrote:
>
>
> 3.4.1. Technical Decisions
>
> Technical decisions should normally be made by the entire community
> using consensus
> gathering, and not through formal voting.
>
> Technical decisions must be made on a project development mailing list.
>
>
There cannot be feature parity since the ASA1000v is only supported on
VMWare.
Should the ASA1000v be created on demand, or
do we expect the admin to provision a pool of virtual ASAs?
Should we support VXLAN as the isolation technology or VLANs?
On 1/3/13 5:08 PM, "Manan Shah" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>
network.gc.* cannot be per cluster? Per zone perhaps?
network.redundantrouter -- why isn't the network offering sufficient?
vm.allocation.algorithm - not sure how this can be account-based
On 1/3/13 4:35 PM, "Manan Shah" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I would like to propose a new feature for allowing granu
Actually the proposal is quite vague.
What does affinity mean to the end-user?
What guarantees are being asked for?
- the vms are on the same hypervisor (affinity)
- the vms are not on the same hypervisor (anti)
- the vms are interconnected by a high-speed interconnect (affinity)
- the vms are
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-229?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chip Childers deleted CLOUDSTACK-229:
-
> Getting started with CloudStack
> ---
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-682?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13543516#comment-13543516
]
Chip Childers commented on CLOUDSTACK-682:
--
Is this still an issue? Here are
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-600?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13543515#comment-13543515
]
Andrew Bayer commented on CLOUDSTACK-600:
-
No idea how we would recover - we c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-600?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13543514#comment-13543514
]
Marcus Sorensen commented on CLOUDSTACK-600:
How do you recover? Or do you
How do you recover? Or do you just abandon those VMS?
On Jan 3, 2013 6:35 PM, "Andrew Bayer (JIRA)" wrote:
>
> [
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-600?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13543509#comment-13543509]
>
> Andrew
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-600?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13543509#comment-13543509
]
Andrew Bayer commented on CLOUDSTACK-600:
-
Next time I get to a machine that I
Hi,
I would like to propose a new feature for integrating Cisco ASA 1000v in
CS 4.1. I have created a JIRA ticket and provided the requirements at the
following location. Please provide feedback on the requirements.
JIRA Ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-743
Requirements:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-743?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Manan Shah reassigned CLOUDSTACK-743:
-
Assignee: Koushik Das
> Integrate Cisco VSG in CloudStack
> -
Manan Shah created CLOUDSTACK-743:
-
Summary: Integrate Cisco VSG in CloudStack
Key: CLOUDSTACK-743
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-743
Project: CloudStack
Issue Type: Ne
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-735?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rohit Yadav closed CLOUDSTACK-735.
--
Assignee: Rohit Yadav (was: Prasanna Santhanam)
Discussed with Prasanna... Instead of fixi
Hi,
I would like to propose a new feature for integrating Cisco ASA 1000v in
CS 4.1. I have created a JIRA ticket and provided the requirements at the
following location. Please provide feedback on the requirements.
JIRA Ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-742
Requirements:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-742?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Manan Shah updated CLOUDSTACK-742:
--
Assignee: Koushik Das
> Integrate Cisco ASA 1000v into CloudStack
> ---
Manan Shah created CLOUDSTACK-742:
-
Summary: Integrate Cisco ASA 1000v into CloudStack
Key: CLOUDSTACK-742
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-742
Project: CloudStack
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-600?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13543474#comment-13543474
]
Marcus Sorensen commented on CLOUDSTACK-600:
The fact that there is no def
Way to go Joe!
Sonny H. Chhen
Manager of User Interface & User Experience | Citrix Systems - CloudPlatform
4988 Great America Parkway, Santa Clara, CA 95054, USA
-Original Message-
From: Musayev, Ilya [mailto:imusa...@webmd.net]
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2013 2:57 PM
To:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-600?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13543462#comment-13543462
]
Andrew Bayer commented on CLOUDSTACK-600:
-
The problem is that the management
Hi,
I would like to propose a new feature for allowing granular Global Config
parameters in CS 4.1. I have created a JIRA ticket and provided
the requirements at the following location. Please provide feedback on
the requirements.
JIRA Ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-741
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-741?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Manan Shah reassigned CLOUDSTACK-741:
-
Assignee: Koushik Das
> Granular Global Parameters
> --
>
Manan Shah created CLOUDSTACK-741:
-
Summary: Granular Global Parameters
Key: CLOUDSTACK-741
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-741
Project: CloudStack
Issue Type: New Featu
Chiradeep Vittal created CLOUDSTACK-740:
---
Summary: Refactor networking core for clarity
Key: CLOUDSTACK-740
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-740
Project: CloudStack
Hi,
I would like to propose a new feature for enabling Affinity /
Anti-affinity rules in CS 4.1. I have created a JIRA ticket and provided
the requirements at the following location. Please provide feedback on
the requirements.
JIRA Ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-739
Re
Don't get things tooo complicated, let's make the simple thing work:
One hypervisor in one zone, with one or multiple zone-wide primary storages.
Without any special configurations, NFS/ceph + KVM can work under this
configuration.
If there are storage providers which can provide per volume per I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Manan Shah reassigned CLOUDSTACK-739:
-
Assignee: Prachi Damle
> Affinity / Anti-affinity Rules
> ---
Manan Shah created CLOUDSTACK-739:
-
Summary: Affinity / Anti-affinity Rules
Key: CLOUDSTACK-739
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-739
Project: CloudStack
Issue Type: New F
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-738?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Manan Shah reassigned CLOUDSTACK-738:
-
Assignee: Sonny Chhen
> Ability to manage Basic and Advanced Zone using a single
Manan Shah created CLOUDSTACK-738:
-
Summary: Ability to manage Basic and Advanced Zone using a single
instance of CloudStack
Key: CLOUDSTACK-738
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-738
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-735?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasanna Santhanam resolved CLOUDSTACK-735.
---
Resolution: Won't Fix
Below is the response from a 4.0 install of CloudSt
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-737?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Manan Shah updated CLOUDSTACK-737:
--
Description:
Requirements described at:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDST
> On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 2:06 PM, Frank Zhang wrote:
> > Hi community:
> > I'd like to propose a proposal for integrating Cisco
> > UCS(unified computing system) with CloudStack. UCS unifies computing,
> > networking, management, virtualization, and storage access into a
> > single integr
I am proposing the requirements document that I have created.
Regards,
Manan Shah
On 1/3/13 3:59 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
>So which spec is the one you are proposing?
>
>- chip
>
>
>On Jan 3, 2013, at 6:50 PM, Manan Shah wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to propose a new feature for enab
So which spec is the one you are proposing?
- chip
On Jan 3, 2013, at 6:50 PM, Manan Shah wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose a new feature for enabling Security Groups
> Isolation in Advanced Zone in CS 4.1. I have created a JIRA ticket and
> provided the requirements at the following lo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-737?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Manan Shah reassigned CLOUDSTACK-737:
-
Assignee: Anthony Xu
> Security Groups Isolation in Advanced Zone
> -
Why would CloudStack need an API to register subscribers?
Wouldn¹t they directly go to the broker?
On 12/20/12 3:46 AM, "Murali Reddy" wrote:
>
>>
>>Hey Murali,
>>
>>Great to hear about where you stand right now. Is the code (work in
>>progress obviously) available on one of the branches? I'd
Hi,
I would like to propose a new feature for enabling Security Groups
Isolation in Advanced Zone in CS 4.1. I have created a JIRA ticket and
provided the requirements at the following location. Please provide
feedback on the requirements.
There was also a discussion started in mid-November on t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-724?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hari Kannan updated CLOUDSTACK-724:
---
Description:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Zone-wide+primary+sto
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-724?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hari Kannan updated CLOUDSTACK-724:
---
Summary: Zone-wide primary storage target (was: Shared NFS Zone-wide
(primary) Block Sto
Manan Shah created CLOUDSTACK-737:
-
Summary: Security Groups Isolation in Advanced Zone
Key: CLOUDSTACK-737
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-737
Project: CloudStack
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-736?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rohit Yadav resolved CLOUDSTACK-736.
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed on api_refactoring:
commit 102fcf370ba2bf539870d204e1331836665
Rohit Yadav created CLOUDSTACK-736:
--
Summary: Integration smoke tests: Fix check for vm name for the
deployvm smoke test
Key: CLOUDSTACK-736
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-736
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-735?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rohit Yadav updated CLOUDSTACK-735:
---
Fix Version/s: 4.1.0
> Integration smoke tests: Fix expunge vm test on api_refactorin
Rohit Yadav created CLOUDSTACK-735:
--
Summary: Integration smoke tests: Fix expunge vm test on
api_refactoring
Key: CLOUDSTACK-735
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-735
Project: Cl
Prasanna, Min and I are working on stabilising the branch and working on
integration tests. Everyone is welcome to pull latest changes from
api_refactoring and report bugs, help test and whatnot.
Right now tests are passing but there are few issues which are being worked on.
Will send out a com
re:disk offering, I imagine this working as follows:
admin adds a primary storage 'Z' that is zone-wide, gives it tag 'X'
admin creates disk offering 'Y' with tag 'X'
data disks requested via disk offering 'Y' will end up on primary storage
'Z'
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Hari Kannan wrote:
Congrats Joe!
-Original Message-
From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2013 8:33 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: New PPMC Member: Joe Brockmeier
Congratulations Joe
Animesh
> -Original Message-
> From
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-734?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rohit Yadav closed CLOUDSTACK-734.
--
Assignee: Rohit Yadav (was: Min Chen)
Smoke tests for deployvm passed by integration tests
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-734?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rohit Yadav resolved CLOUDSTACK-734.
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed on api_refactoring;
Author: Min Chen
AuthorDate: Thu Jan
Congrats Kelcey!
-Original Message-
From: Hugo Trippaers [mailto:htrippa...@schubergphilis.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2013 6:25 AM
To:
Subject: RE: New committer: Kelcey Damage
Congrats Kelcey :-)
> -Original Message-
> From: John Kinsella [mailto:j...@stratosec.co]
> Se
Actually, let me clarify my original question, as re-reading it seems like it
was misleading. Since all hypervisors don't support this capability (for
example, XS doesn't), but a zone can be heterogeneous (from a hypervisor
perspective), we need to support the capability to allow both zone-wide
Hi all,
I updated the API refactoring wiki page with the list.
The page
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+API+refactoring
It also contains the link to the FS (in doc), where you can find more info
regarding this project.
A clarification about the UUID. This
> -Original Message-
> From: Hari Kannan [mailto:hari.kan...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2013 1:46 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Zone-wide primary storage target
>
> Hi Alex, Chip,
>
> That's easy, I will change the name :-)
>
> @ A
+1 (binding)
On 1/3/13 10:53 AM, "Sudha Ponnaganti" wrote:
>+1 (binding)
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2013 7:30 AM
>To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>Subject: [VOTE] Project Bylaws
>
>Hi all,
>
>We've h
Sure, the pypi community release 4.0.0-2
(http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/c/cloudmonkey/cloudmonkey-4.0.0-2.tar.gz#md5=6125f804bc1dec4447df1e1b48a7d85b)
has the latest changes with tabular output etc. I can upload the latest tar
ball that would make it 4.0.0-3?
Or, for project releases,
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Chip Childers
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Although this list is officially the Apache CloudStack dev list, I
> think it's also the right place to collaborate about the
> cloudstack-extras Github organization (
> https://github.com/CloudStack-extras ). Any issues using th
> Also, that reminds me... some of the long running branches (acl,
> events-framework, javelin) seem to be dependencies for some of the
> proposed features. Specifically, I can point to the events-framework
> branch and the snmp trap feature. Are folks planning on proposing
> those changes as pa
>
>Also, that reminds me... some of the long running branches (acl,
>events-framework, javelin) seem to be dependencies for some of the
>proposed features. Specifically, I can point to the events-framework
>branch and the snmp trap feature. Are folks planning on proposing
>those changes as part
I will publish a rough draft by tomorrow.
For time being I will have Test plans/results on wiki and we can look in to
Open source TCM for future projects.
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2013 1:44 PM
To: cloudstac
Couple of things we changed for the API refactoring, the goal is to make the
overall code more
Modular and fit the new orchestration architecture, in the mean time, it does
not require the client to
change their existing API to access Cloudstack.
Item 1. For each API command, the original @
+1
On 1/3/13 8:39 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>Although this list is officially the Apache CloudStack dev list, I
>think it's also the right place to collaborate about the
>cloudstack-extras Github organization (
>https://github.com/CloudStack-extras ). Any issues using this list to
>
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Chiradeep Vittal
wrote:
> Of course there is a difference between "not much" and NO difference.
> Can we be more precise?
>
Yes, please!
--David
Of course there is a difference between "not much" and NO difference.
Can we be more precise?
On 1/3/13 10:57 AM, "Fang Wang" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>It won't affect the client side API.
>It mainly help to make internal CS code modular, and do access check as
>early as possible.
>For external users, ther
On 1/3/13 3:20 AM, "Hugo Trippaers" wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: John Kinsella [mailto:j...@stratosec.co]
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2013 10:05 PM
>> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [ASFCS41] IPv6 Support
>>
>> Good comments - keep 'em coming!
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 4:50 PM, John Kinsella wrote:
> btw you can add jab as ppmc in there, now, in case you haven't. :)
Done - as well as Sebastien as committer
> On Jan 3, 2013, at 1:22 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
>>> Note - I've poste
> -Original Message-
> From: Hari Kannan [mailto:hari.kan...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2013 1:46 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Zone-wide primary storage target
>
> Hi Alex, Chip,
>
> That's easy, I will change the name :-)
>
> @ A
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 7:18 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
wrote:
> Folks
>
> I was reviewing the wiki on Adding New Features
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Adding+new+features+and+design+documents
> to Cloudstack, and I was wondering that a feature proposal can come from a
btw you can add jab as ppmc in there, now, in case you haven't. :)
On Jan 3, 2013, at 1:22 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
>> Note - I've posted this to the wiki, but will make changes if necessary.
>> Wanted to make sure it's in by deadline.
>>
1 - 100 of 286 matches
Mail list logo
