> >Also, that reminds me... some of the long running branches (acl, >events-framework, javelin) seem to be dependencies for some of the >proposed features. Specifically, I can point to the events-framework >branch and the snmp trap feature. Are folks planning on proposing >those changes as part of the release as well? > >I'm personally starting to get concerned about how we get all of this >integrated (much less developed) by the end of the month. Thoughts?
Yes, that is a LOT of stuff. Especially since a lot of features have been proposed over the winter break. Some of them are small/independent, but I can see some features treading on each other.
