Jessica Tomechak created CLOUDSTACK-364:
---
Summary: Docs point to download.cloud.com for AWS API script
Key: CLOUDSTACK-364
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-364
Project: Cloud
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13477652#comment-13477652
]
Jessica Tomechak commented on CLOUDSTACK-4:
---
Gavin,
I see it. I was in the mid
Hi Sangeetha,
Please see my comments inline.
Thanks,
Jayapal
> -Original Message-
> From: Sangeetha Hariharan
> Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 4:35 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Jayapal Reddy Uradi
> Subject: RE: StaticNAT, Portforwarding and FIrewall implemenation on
Please find my comments inline.
Thanks,
Jayapal
> -Original Message-
> From: Sangeetha Hariharan [mailto:sangeetha.hariha...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 2:17 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Alena Prokharchyk
> Subject: RE: StaticNAT, Portforwarding and FI
On 17-Oct-2012, at 2:37 AM, Edison Su wrote:
> I think we don't need this patch at all, target/dist folder are created when
> I build devcloud, so if you don't delete them explicitly, there shouldn't
> have any problem.
Yes, but as on the 4.0 test procedure wiki, when we clean up the environm
Here is automation status that Anshul has been working on if anyone would like
to contribute
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/EC2+Query+API+Test+Suite+Automation
-Original Message-
From: Anshul Gangwar [mailto:anshul.gang...@citrix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 16,
On 10/09/12 17:50, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 07:56:01AM -0400, Pedro Navarro Pérez wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> First of all I'd like to introduce ourselves, Bruno (CC'ed) and me
>> would like to collaborate in testing and developing the Amazon EC2 API
>> in Cloudstack.
>>
>> W
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-303?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13477609#comment-13477609
]
Radhika Nair commented on CLOUDSTACK-303:
-
Thanks David. Please do review my p
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-303?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13477607#comment-13477607
]
David Nalley commented on CLOUDSTACK-303:
-
Radhika:
I'll take care of this t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-303?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Nalley reassigned CLOUDSTACK-303:
---
Assignee: David Nalley (was: Radhika Nair)
> Upgrade instructions in the 4.0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-303?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13477605#comment-13477605
]
Radhika Nair commented on CLOUDSTACK-303:
-
is that instead of running install.
Hi Chip/David/Wido/Jessica
Please review my patch at the earliest: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7593/
I have submitted it two days back.
Regards
-Radhika
-Original Message-
From: Radhika Puthiyetath [mailto:radhika.puthiyet...@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 10:00 AM
To:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13477589#comment-13477589
]
gavin lee commented on CLOUDSTACK-4:
Hi, Jessica
Please refer to the outgoing review
Hi, Jessica
Please refer to the outgoing review request: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7597/
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 7:43 AM, Jessica Tomechak (JIRA)
wrote:
>
> [
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focuse
Hi,
I have fixed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-344
Nobody has reviewed my patch yet.
Also, I had queries wrt the upgrade at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-303
If install.sh is not present how customers are going to upgrade to 4.0 ?
If someone in the list
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-134?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13477502#comment-13477502
]
edison su commented on CLOUDSTACK-134:
--
Yes, it's only for xen.
> -Original Message-
> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 2:33 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DOCS] Not posting 4.0 docs to website?
>
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Jessica Tomechak <
> jessica.tomec...@gmail.com> w
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-134?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13477499#comment-13477499
]
Jessica Tomechak commented on CLOUDSTACK-134:
-
Edison's comment implies th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-345?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13477496#comment-13477496
]
Jessica Tomechak commented on CLOUDSTACK-345:
-
Does this apply only to KVM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-134?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13477492#comment-13477492
]
Jessica Tomechak commented on CLOUDSTACK-134:
-
About (1), we aren't talkin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13477478#comment-13477478
]
David Nalley commented on CLOUDSTACK-348:
-
Since we are rerolling an attempt a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-345?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13477475#comment-13477475
]
Jessica Tomechak commented on CLOUDSTACK-345:
-
Libvirt is mentioned in the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alena Prokharchyk resolved CLOUDSTACK-348.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed with a9fab0526b466fffa398c522e876a558554e793e
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13477472#comment-13477472
]
Jessica Tomechak commented on CLOUDSTACK-4:
---
Several sections have been added,
Alright. Any disagreements?
If not, we'll postpone another RC until those bugs are resolved and
merged into the 4.0 branch.
- chip
Sent from my iPhone.
On Oct 16, 2012, at 7:19 PM, Kevin Kluge wrote:
> I'd like to see the doc bugs that David referenced added to the bug list. I
> removed one
I'd like to see the doc bugs that David referenced added to the bug list. I
removed one that seemed more like a format change, that leaves
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-344
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-345
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-30
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-102?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13477453#comment-13477453
]
Jessica Tomechak commented on CLOUDSTACK-102:
-
The steps after building th
Keeping Brian in the loop too
On 10/16/12 4:04 PM, "Sangeetha Hariharan"
wrote:
>Jayapal,
>
>I had another question regarding the UI implementation:
>
>In UI Changes section , following is mentioned:
>
>"The following changes are needed for the networks page for the external
>device SRX network.
Jayapal,
I had another question regarding the UI implementation:
In UI Changes section , following is mentioned:
"The following changes are needed for the networks page for the external device
SRX network.
1. Network ->Guest Network ->View IP Addresses -> -> Configuration
a. Hide the Firewal
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13477440#comment-13477440
]
Jessica Tomechak commented on CLOUDSTACK-3:
---
For 4.0, maybe we just need to re
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-102?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jessica Tomechak reopened CLOUDSTACK-102:
-
The doc also needs to say what to do once you have built the package. Actual
ins
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jessica Wang reassigned CLOUDSTACK-238:
---
Assignee: Sudha Ponnaganti (was: Jessica Wang)
Sudha,
This is a server-side bug
CLOUDSTACK-363 is fixed in 196961c757ef978fda1e09d46dccce6f0aea5116
The issue pointed out by Marcus is cherry-picked into 4.0:
06bca1d247fc7ac22a11828755117bb41705ecd4
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 3:13 PM
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
edison su closed CLOUDSTACK-363.
Resolution: Fixed
fixed in 196961c757ef978fda1e09d46dccce6f0aea5116
> Ugrades
Thanks.
Any volunteers to address this issue?
- chip
Sent from my iPhone.
On Oct 16, 2012, at 6:07 PM, Chandan Purushothama
wrote:
> Hello Chip,
>
> I filed a blocker bug for Upgrade
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-363
>
> Thank you,
> Chandan.
>
> -Original Message---
Hello Chip,
I filed a blocker bug for Upgrade
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-363
Thank you,
Chandan.
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 2:47 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc: Marcus Sor
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Jessica Tomechak <
jessica.tomec...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Just checking up on the issue linked below, "post docs to new doc
> website," and I notice it's stalled. Comments from Noah and Chip are to the
> effect "this can wait until after we get the software out." I'
To an ordinary user, there is no concept of a hypervisor: the only VM
state machine she interacts with is CloudStack's.
On 10/16/12 7:26 PM, "Alena Prokharchyk"
wrote:
>On 10/16/12 10:19 AM, "Min Chen" wrote:
>
>>According to Gavin, stopVM has already deleted vm metadata from xenserver
>>datab
OK - so in reading through this thread, I believe we are in a position
where we will need to restart the vote again. We are aborting this
vote.
I will package up another RC, and start a third round of voting this
evening or tomorrow morning (depending on how my schedule works out).
I'd like to a
Thanks for the feedback all.
-We can rework the name to make more sense, perhaps panel preview.
-I like the glass effect too.
-We will investigate this more in terms of being able to select items from the
preview. For now this is to help with usability in the manner that Jessica
mentioned.
T
Jessica,
I think you misinterpreted me (which might be my fault). IMO, we
absolutely need the documentation to be posted to the site as part of
the rollout of 4.0.0-incubating. In fact, I started a thread about
this previously [1]. This includes most of the issues that David
mentioned below.
T
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Jessica Tomechak
wrote:
> Just checking up on the issue linked below, "post docs to new doc website,"
> and I notice it's stalled. Comments from Noah and Chip are to the effect
> "this can wait until after we get the software out." I'd just like to go on
> record t
I like the 'glass' border effect
Not sure I like the 'history' windows style hover panal.
KELCEY DAMAGE
Infrastructure Systems Architect
www.backbonetechnology.com
-
kel...@bbits.ca
address: 55 East 7th Ave, Vancou
> -Original Message-
> From: Sonny Chhen [mailto:sonny.ch...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 2:03 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Ui: History view
>
> Hello All,
>
> Below is a link to a description of a minor ui update we're calling
> history view. Thi
I don't see how we can ship without the RPM install docs posted. Once you
build the RPMs I haven't found anything posted that tells you what to do.
Seems like many developers and all non-developers will fail at the install. Am
I missing something?
-kevin
> -Original Message-
> From
Hello John,
This was more of a ux addition. It's similar in how you get a preview thumbnail
in the taskbar in windows 7 when you rollover an item; but for individual
panels. There is a timeout period that should avoid instant popups and
annoyance.
Thanks You and Best Regards,
Sonny H. Chhen
M
Same opinion here - at best distracting - at worst I fear we'll get
bugs filed because it still shows the 'action' buttons, but per the
description it would disappear before you navigated to them, and would
never be clickable.
--David
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 5:09 PM, John Kinsella wrote:
> Was t
Was this user-requested? It doesn't look "minor," and looks more like something
that would cause annoyance, at least IMHO...
On Oct 16, 2012, at 2:03 PM, Sonny Chhen
wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> Below is a link to a description of a minor ui update we're calling history
> view. This will allow yo
I think we don't need this patch at all, target/dist folder are created when I
build devcloud, so if you don't delete them explicitly, there shouldn't have
any problem.
But anyway, it's no harm to add this patch.
> -Original Message-
> From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@citrix.com]
> S
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 4:41 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> This (DevCloud using ant) only works with ant and since we've maven on master
> now, it's not applicable for master.
>
Ahh - ok - thanks for explaining!
--David
Chandan Purushothama created CLOUDSTACK-363:
---
Summary: Ugrades from 2.2.14, 3.0.2 to the Current build will fail
Key: CLOUDSTACK-363
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-363
Hello All,
Below is a link to a description of a minor ui update we're calling history
view. This will allow you to rollover the breadcrumb and view the panel
information without needing to click on the corresponding breadcrumb.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/UI+-+Histor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-361?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
edison su updated CLOUDSTACK-361:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: pre-4.0.0)
4.1.0
> Wrong creation of guest ne
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-361?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
edison su reassigned CLOUDSTACK-361:
Assignee: Marcus Sorensen
It should be fixed on master branch in commit
915babd970a9b4
Yah, the one you mentioned is a simple fix, not a blocker IMHO.
It only be triggered when there is an race condition: " but indeed there is a
race condition between migrating thread and delta sync thread" from the
commence send by Mice.
I'll merge a5bca0999aa010252b1390c4db6dc5023967ab06 into 4.0
Hi Jayapal,
Had the following questions after reviewing the FS.
1) "Case 4:
Firewall rule is not deleted when disable the Static NAT.
1. Acquire Ip P4.
2. Create Firewall for port 22.
3. Enable static NAT on P2 for VM2.
4. Disable static NAT.
5. Enable static NAT
7.PublicNetwork# ssh (ssh to VM
That's fine. I understand Edison's issue but the one I mention is a
fairly problematic bug and a simple fix. Not sure where the line
should be as far as blockers but I think this should be merged in
personally.
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Edison Su wrote:
> Oh, I see why I didn't merge 915ba
This (DevCloud using ant) only works with ant and since we've maven on master
now, it's not applicable for master.
From: David Nalley [da...@gnsa.us]
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 1:47 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: git commit:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Musayev, Ilya wrote:
> Can we make Campo feature list not password protected like Burbank? It seems
> like only some people can see it (I certainly cant, eventhough I have an
> account cloudstack.org)
>
> http://confluence.cloudstack.org/display/PM/Campo
>
>
Sor
Is there a reason this only hit 4.0?
--David
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 12:09 PM, wrote:
> Updated Branches:
> refs/heads/4.0 6c6d9bb89 -> 53a3c2f17
>
>
> DevCloud: Make sure destination paths exists before scp
>
> Makes dirs if they are not present before scp-ing target/ and dist/ to
> devcloud
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-362?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ilya musayev updated CLOUDSTACK-362:
Description:
I've installed Jenkins Build CloudStack-non-OSS-101 few week back and toda
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-362?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ilya musayev updated CLOUDSTACK-362:
Description:
I've installed Jenkins Build CloudStack-non-OSS-101 few week back and toda
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-362?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ilya musayev updated CLOUDSTACK-362:
Description:
I've installed Jenkins Build CloudStack-non-OSS-101 few week back and toda
ilya musayev created CLOUDSTACK-362:
---
Summary: Jenkins Build CloudStack-non-OSS-137 Upgrade Script fails
Key: CLOUDSTACK-362
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-362
Project: CloudSt
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-361?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13477298#comment-13477298
]
Prasanna Santhanam commented on CLOUDSTACK-361:
---
Looks like KVM multiple
>
> -Original Message-
> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 5:19 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DOCS] Proposed technique for making tooltips from doc XML
> files
>
> >
> > David,
> > You bring up a question which I meant
Just checking up on the issue linked below, "post docs to new doc website,"
and I notice it's stalled. Comments from Noah and Chip are to the effect
"this can wait until after we get the software out." I'd just like to go on
record that I think it would be very helpful to users if we can get these
Chandan Purushothama created CLOUDSTACK-361:
---
Summary: Wrong creation of guest networks on a KVM host in
Multiple Physical Networks with guest traffic
Key: CLOUDSTACK-361
URL: https://issues.apache.org/j
Oh, I see why I didn't merge 915babd970a9b4f209deceb3c4973b7d1c9c0c12 into 4.0
branch, as the commit is too disruptive.
I'd rather like to leave it as it is for 4.0: no support for guest traffic type
on multiple physical networks in 4.0 on KVM. Translates to plain English, is
that you can't crea
Edison/Marcus please test and cherry pick both of them to 4.0? Thanks.
They were not blocker on 4.0 may be that's why we did not cherry-pick them.
But we should be in code freeze, otherwise there will be many bugs/features
which are targeted for 4.1.0 and they apply for 4.0.0 too.
Regards.
Need to merge another one also:
commit 915babd970a9b4f209deceb3c4973b7d1c9c0c12
Author: Marcus Sorensen
Date: Wed Sep 26 17:14:57 2012 -0700
fix kvm traffic labels (guest traffic types on multiple networks don't
work)
> -Original Message-
> From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shado
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Chiradeep Vittal
wrote:
>
>>>
>>> 4. Since both SRX and F5 are being programmed when creating a LB rule ,
>>>if either one of them is down/unreachable , we should expect the LB rule
>>>creation to error out . In such cases , will we be providing an error
>>>messag
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Chiradeep Vittal
wrote:
> One request:
> Some answers seem guarded: "seems", "maybe", "probably". Of course we may
> not have all answers, but how do we track these uncertainties as they get
> resolved?
We've identified SRX have some serious limitations on remote
my vote is -1... got stuck in ErrorInMaintenance. We need to cherry
pick a5bca0999aa010252b1390c4db6dc5023967ab06 from master.
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> I checked again this time with a fresh devcloud, the commands that clean up
> devcloud's git repo and pulls new co
I checked again this time with a fresh devcloud, the commands that clean up
devcloud's git repo and pulls new code removes dist/ which caused issue for
Noah. It's fixed in 4.0 now.
I think I may have messed up build/override/, so it gave me deploydb errors but
with fresh devcloud import, no erro
On 10/16/12 10:19 AM, "Min Chen" wrote:
>According to Gavin, stopVM has already deleted vm metadata from xenserver
>database, what extra cleanup is done in expunge call besides destroying
>vm volumes? I guess that my confusion is this: for a normal end-user, how
>can he relate our CloudStack UI e
Why it failed? Any log? The same procedure works for me and chip.
> -Original Message-
> From: Rohit Yadav
> Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 10:11 AM
> To: Edison Su
> Cc: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, second
> round
>
According to Gavin, stopVM has already deleted vm metadata from xenserver
database, what extra cleanup is done in expunge call besides destroying vm
volumes? I guess that my confusion is this: for a normal end-user, how can he
relate our CloudStack UI exposed operations (stop and destroy) to sim
Can we make Campo feature list not password protected like Burbank? It seems
like only some people can see it (I certainly cant, eventhough I have an
account cloudstack.org)
http://confluence.cloudstack.org/display/PM/Campo
Yes, but the wiki also also suggests to clean DevCloud:
ssh root@localhost -p 'cd /opt/cloudstack/; rm -rf apache-tomcat-6.0.32;
unzip apache-tomcat-6.0.32.zip; cd incubator-cloudstack; git clean -f; git
reset --hard; git pull --rebase; git clean -f; git checkout origin/4.0 -b 4.0
-f '
Th
On 10/16/12 10:04 AM, "Min Chen" wrote:
>Thanks Alena, So destroying an already stopped VM is just updating
>CloudStack DB without interacting with hypervisor, do we send hypervisor
>command when we expunge the
>destroyed VM?
Yes.
>
>Thanks
>-min
>
>On 10/16/12 9:54 AM, "Alena Prokharchyk"
>wr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sonny Chhen reassigned CLOUDSTACK-238:
--
Assignee: Jessica Wang (was: Pranav Saxena)
> vpn:fail to connect to vpnserver
Thanks Alena, So destroying an already stopped VM is just updating
CloudStack DB without interacting with hypervisor, do we send hypervisor
command when we expunge the
destroyed VM?
Thanks
-min
On 10/16/12 9:54 AM, "Alena Prokharchyk"
wrote:
>Forgot to mention: if Destroy command is called on v
On 10/16/12 8:34 AM, "Jayapal Reddy Uradi"
wrote:
>
>Though CreateNetworkACL and CreateFirewallRule APIs are configuring
>the firewall rules, but there is difference in the purpose for which it
>is used.
>CreateNetworkACL - API is used for configuring firewall
>rules per Ne
Forgot to mention: if Destroy command is called on vm in Running state,
cloudStack:
* Stops vm on the backend (just the way we do when StopVm command is
executed, so you no longer see the vm on the hypervisor)
* marks vm as Destroyed in the DB.
On 10/16/12 9:53 AM, "Alena Prokharchyk"
wrote:
>O
On 10/16/12 9:46 AM, "Min Chen" wrote:
>Thanks Lee for clarification. Then my next natural question is: what is
>the difference between stop instance and destroy instance (which are also
>shown on CloudStack UI)?
cloudStack doesn't send any commands to the backend on DestroyVm command.
The vm i
In CloudStack, stop means to power off the VM (with a force optional),
destroy means to delete the VM.
It's sort of confusing, because 'destroy' tends to mean 'force shut
down' in KVM/libvirt and Xen rather than deleting.
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Min Chen wrote:
> Thanks Lee for clarifi
Rdeploydb will recreate db in devcloud, right? It's documented in the test
procedure.
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 16, 2012, at 9:15 AM, "Rohit Yadav" wrote:
> Another issue I found was that we're cleaning DevCloud, which cleans the
> override/templates.sql, pl. make a backup of it. And, pl. r
Thanks Lee for clarification. Then my next natural question is: what is
the difference between stop instance and destroy instance (which are also
shown on CloudStack UI)?
-min
On 10/15/12 7:33 PM, "Gavin Lee" wrote:
>It's by design, when you stop a VM (advanceStop() in
>VirtualMachineManagerImp
By the way, KVM doesn't lack GetDomRVersionCmd. It's in
core/src/com/cloud/agent/resource/virtualnetwork/VirtualRoutingResource.java,
and it calls getDomRVersion, which runs router_proxy.sh (a script on
the host that will SSH into the router VM) to call
get_template_version.sh within the router.
O
I have generally only seen the getDomRVersionCmd fail followed by
stopping the vm if it can't ssh into the system VM to run the command.
I am sure this is a general symptom of failing to set up or
communicate with the virtual router rather than an actual issue
related to getting the domr version.
Hi,
Validated using Rhel 6.3 OSS build with hypervisor Xen 6.0.2 .
Basic , Advanced Zone Configuration and VM Life Cycle operations are
validated using the build @ CloudStack-oss-4.0.0-701.tar .
My vote is +1 .
Thanks and Regards,
Sailaja.M
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers
Another issue I found was that we're cleaning DevCloud, which cleans the
override/templates.sql, pl. make a backup of it. And, pl. rdeploydb to start
afresh, your old devcloud image will have old database (3.x) which will be
failed by DatabaseUpgradeChecker upon ant rdebug.
Edison, can we crea
Okay, I re-read the logs and found the issues:
1. If you're using PPA: natecarlson/maven3, we will have to use mvn3, so mvn3
-P deps. Updated the 4.0 test procedure wiki.
2. Since, we've moved from ant and we clean the repository in Test the Build
section. This cleans up target and dist folder
i am tracing this problem. but i ask about it first.
1.what it use for? what kinds of data it return when launch GetDomRVersionCmd
if i write missing parts?
now i only know when new a routerVM(which created when new a userVM)
because of missing GetDomRVersionCmd , its answer result is fa
Though CreateNetworkACL and CreateFirewallRule APIs are configuring the
firewall rules, but there is difference in the purpose for which it is used.
CreateNetworkACL - API is used for configuring firewall rules
per Network.
CreateFirewallRule - API is used for
[Resending under new subject; dropping "What Gartner..."]
On that note, OSCON featured a comparison by Oregon State Uni's Open Source Lab
http://www.oscon.com/oscon2012/public/schedule/detail/24376
Slides at
http://www.slideshare.net/OReillyOSCON/comparing-open-source-private-cloud-platform
I'm offline in a all day meeting. Can someone help Noah please?
- chip
Sent from my iPhone.
On Oct 16, 2012, at 11:00 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
> I just tried to clean the source locally and redeploy and get the same
> error.
>
> Chip, can you advise please?
>
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 2:48 PM, N
I just tried to clean the source locally and redeploy and get the same
error.
Chip, can you advise please?
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
> I am following the instructions from the wiki, copy and paste style.
>
> This is the FIRST time the rdeploy thing managed to SSH into
On that note, OSCON featured a comparison by Oregon State Uni's Open Source Lab
http://www.oscon.com/oscon2012/public/schedule/detail/24376
Slides at
http://www.slideshare.net/OReillyOSCON/comparing-open-source-private-cloud-platforms
Their lab focuses on our constituency: open source develo
1 - 100 of 134 matches
Mail list logo
