Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-42 Code that generates the installer and binary bundle isn't in the ASF repo

> On Sept. 12, 2012, 6:49 a.m., Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > > I don't know if this really belongs to the repo and/or if this is the > > agreed path to be taken for packaging. > > > > But if you *do* want to get it into the repo you'd have to test that it > > works on the current codebase unde

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-42 Code that generates the installer and binary bundle isn't in the ASF repo

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7052/#review11390 --- I don't know if this really belongs to the repo and/or if this is the

Re: Review Request: [DOCS]Docbook xml for section: Citrix XenServer Installation

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6917/#review11389 --- Hi Gavin, Thanks for the work, that looks much better - I did find

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-42) Code that generates the "installer / binary" bundle isn't in the ASF repo

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-42?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13453787#comment-13453787 ] Pradeep Soundararajan commented on CLOUDSTACK-42: - Sent the patch for r

Re: Review Request: [DOCS]Docbook xml for section: Citrix XenServer Installation

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6917/ --- (Updated Sept. 12, 2012, 6:43 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, David Nalley

Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-42 Code that generates the installer and binary bundle isn't in the ASF repo

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7052/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Chip Childers and edison su. Description ---

Re: ant debug failed to launch

Hi, Edison Sorry for late response since I'm seeking solution. The issue persisted still in my env. I saw your update and it took effect when deploy-server, there is only servlet-api.jar under $CATALINA_HOME/lib/. Unfortunately the "ant debug" still had the same issue. Hi, Chiradeep, I tried apach

RE: fail to install MS on UBuntu12.04

HI Edison, The below blocker bug is still in open state and as per Wido den Hollander, its already addressed in the fowling commit "664927948a3b2cf10320221db6247a4c20887ac2". Can we get the new build which addresses the cloudstack-76 issue also kindly update the issue with your fix resolved

Re: [ASF40]What release number should we choose?

On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 1:53 AM, Pradeep Soundararajan wrote: > This is my view. I feel it is not necessary to append the build number and rc > tag with the pre-release build. > > In CloudPlatform for every pre-release we are following 3.0.4-1, 3.0.4-2 etc. > I think this denotes RC build. > > 3

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-79) CloudStack 3.0.4: firewall rules not restored on KVM host

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-79?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13453740#comment-13453740 ] David Nalley commented on CLOUDSTACK-79: So I personally like the idea of: com

Re: [ASFCS40]Issues with Netscaler

> > Below are the observations with Netscaler while testing with RC1. > > 1. Access Network Service providers=> Netscaler from Cloudstack UI and > Tried to view the devices : It failed saying > command:listNetscalerLoadBalancers does not exist > 2. Tried to add new Netscaler Device : It f

RE: [ASF40]What release number should we choose?

This is my view. I feel it is not necessary to append the build number and rc tag with the pre-release build. In CloudPlatform for every pre-release we are following 3.0.4-1, 3.0.4-2 etc. I think this denotes RC build. 3.0.4-0. denotes normal build. Thanks, Pradeep.S -Original Message--

Re: [ASF40]What release number should we choose?

On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 9:47 PM, Edison Su wrote: > Refer to bug https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-44 and patch > from https://reviews.apache.org/r/7013/, can we decide which release number > for the rc1 and formal release? Something like: 4.0.0-rc1.{build number}, > 4.0.0(for fo

Re: Review Request: Set correct version for database version check

On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 7:50 PM, Hiroaki Kawai wrote: > > >> On Sept. 11, 2012, 6:06 p.m., edison su wrote: >> > We just need to fix the parameter passed into build system. Right now, the >> > version number 4.0.{build number} is passed in, so each time, from mgt >> > server point of view, it's

Re: Review Request: [DOCS]Docbook xml for section: Citrix XenServer Installation

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6917/#review11385 --- Hi Gavin, Sorry I missed this earlier - there are a lot of tabs her

[ASFCS40]Issues with Netscaler

Hi, Below are the observations with Netscaler while testing with RC1. 1. Access Network Service providers=> Netscaler from Cloudstack UI and Tried to view the devices : It failed saying command:listNetscalerLoadBalancers does not exist 2. Tried to add new Netscaler Device : It failed

Re: ant debug failed to launch

Also I recall that Tomcat 6.033 has some issue with log4j and won't start. We use 6.0.32 -- Chiradeep On Sep 11, 2012, at 20:26, "Edison Su" wrote: > I fixed it in master, could you have a try? > ant clean-tomcat > ant build-all deploy-server > >> -Original Message- >> From: Edison Su

Re: Review Request: when a template is deleted and then copied over again , it is still marked as "Removed" in template_zone_ref table.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7018/#review11381 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Nitin Mehta On Sept. 11, 2012, 2:41 p.m., bha

RE: Review Request: Support for local data disk feature. (CS-14277)

Code pushed with commit 65eeeaf071fb79c717226a915944b68114919818 From: Nitin Mehta [mailto:nore...@reviews.apache.org] On Behalf Of Nitin Mehta Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 9:37 AM To: Abhinandan Prateek; Nitin Mehta Cc: cloudstack; Koushik Das Subject: Re: Review Request: Support for local

Re: Review Request: Support for local data disk feature. (CS-14277)

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6431/#review11380 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Nitin Mehta On Sept. 11, 2012, 9:50 a.m., Kou

RE: ant debug failed to launch

I fixed it in master, could you have a try? ant clean-tomcat ant build-all deploy-server > -Original Message- > From: Edison Su [mailto:edison...@citrix.com] > Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 7:45 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: ant debug failed to launch > >

RE: ant debug failed to launch

rm $CATALINA_HOME/lib/servlet-api-2.5-20081211.jar rm $CATALINA_HOME/lib/servlet-api-2.3.jar > -Original Message- > From: Gavin Lee [mailto:gavin@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 7:26 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: ant debug failed to launch

Re: Review Request: [DOCS]Docbook xml for section: Citrix XenServer Installation

Can somebody help with this review? It's a week ago. Thanks. On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Gavin Lee wrote: >This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/6917/ > Review request for cloudstack, David Nalley and Jessica Tomechak. > By Gavin Le

Re: ant debug failed to launch

I still can not pass by the issue with Chiradeep's guide. "mvn -P deps" will download jars to deps folder which include the jars mentioned here. Some build xml file depends on the jars, eg: package.xml and build-aws-api.xml depend on axis*.jar. Some version info in my env: CentOS 6.2 x64 apache-to

RE: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-10:Deleting a disconnected primary storage results in partial removed state

No, the new code will be checked in after 4.0. > -Original Message- > From: Mice Xia [mailto:mice_...@tcloudcomputing.com] > Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 6:54 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Edison Su; Alena Prokharchyk > Cc: gavin.lxh > Subject: RE: Review Request: CLO

Re: Review Request: typo in cloud-install-sys-tmplt

> On Sept. 12, 2012, 1:46 a.m., mice xia wrote: > > this is CLOUDSTACK-37, already committed in master > > b52bd1fc5a00a3e1443e0cd30707ed961ea2a6f3 Fixd in master b3d4246a141854303ac9e72e3eb2b92ba01aca40, thanks. Then CLOUDSTACK-37 might be closed :-) - Hiroaki

RE: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-10:Deleting a disconnected primary storage results in partial removed state

Edison, Do you schedule to commit new storage code before 4.0 release? if not, I will fix it with simple workaround. Regards Mice -Original Message- From: edison su [mailto:nore...@reviews.apache.org] On Behalf Of edison su Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 1:48 AM To: Alena Prokharchy

[ASF40]What release number should we choose?

Refer to bug https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-44 and patch from https://reviews.apache.org/r/7013/, can we decide which release number for the rc1 and formal release? Something like: 4.0.0-rc1.{build number}, 4.0.0(for formal release)?

Re: Review Request: typo in cloud-install-sys-tmplt

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7049/#review11373 --- this is CLOUDSTACK-37, already committed in master b52bd1fc5a00a3e14

Re: Review Request: typo in cloud-install-sys-tmplt

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7049/#review11371 --- Ship it! Ship It! - edison su On Sept. 12, 2012, 12:36 a.m., Hiro

Re: Review Request: Fix the output of instance-id and vm-id to UUID.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6845/#review11369 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Alena Prokharchyk On Aug. 29, 2012, 11:23 p.m

Re: Review Request: Replace db-id by UUID for user VM's vm-id.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6814/#review11367 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Alena Prokharchyk On Aug. 28, 2012, 10:49 p.m

Re: Review Request: Keep the instance-id and vm-id values prior to Acton, use UUID for VMs created poast Acton.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7045/#review11365 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Alena Prokharchyk On Sept. 11, 2012, 11 p.m.,

Review Request: typo in cloud-install-sys-tmplt

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7049/ --- Review request for cloudstack. Description --- cloud-install-sys-tmplt has

Re: Review Request: deployVirtualMachine api, added a check to see if the userdata provided is base64 encoded.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6428/#review11364 --- Ship it! - Prachi Damle On Sept. 7, 2012, 6:07 a.m., Likitha Shett

Re: Review Request: ec2-run-instances fails with error "Unable to find service offering by id". Component: AWSAPI.

> On Aug. 13, 2012, 11:33 p.m., Prachi Damle wrote: > > Since there are changes made to DAO layer, this patch cannot be applied > > as-is. You need to apply your changes again on the work doen by Rajecsh, I > > guess. > > Likitha Shetty wrote: > Changes made to the DAO layer by Rajesh hav

Re: Review Request: Set correct version for database version check

> On Sept. 11, 2012, 6:06 p.m., edison su wrote: > > We just need to fix the parameter passed into build system. Right now, the > > version number 4.0.{build number} is passed in, so each time, from mgt > > server point of view, it's a different version. We can change to > > 4.0.0.{build numbe

RE: [utils.crypt.DBEncryptionUtil] (main:null) Error while decrypting: true

Possible that in 3.0.2 you don't use encryption in DB, while in 4.0 it's turned on. > -Original Message- > From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl] > Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 2:26 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [utils.crypt.DBEncryptionUtil] (

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-28) wget.exe (GPLed) is present in the tools directory as a binary.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-28?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13453541#comment-13453541 ] Sudha Ponnaganti commented on CLOUDSTACK-28: Checking on resolution for thi

[ASFCS40] Drive to clear out the bugs...

Currently under Jira, there are 24 bugs. Please attend to them. Here's the list of people. https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa? Anthony 1 bug Chiradeep 1 bug David Nalley 2 bugs Edison 3 bugs Jessica Tomechak 5 bugs Jessica Wang 2 bugs Mice Xia 1 bug Pradeep 6 bugs Sonny

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-23) Execute CloudStack 4.0 QA plan

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-23?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alex Huang updated CLOUDSTACK-23: - Issue Type: Task (was: Test) > Execute CloudStack 4.0 QA plan > -

Review Request: Keep the instance-id and vm-id values prior to Acton, use UUID for VMs created poast Acton.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7045/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Alena Prokharchyk. Description --- We kee

[jira] [Assigned] (CLOUDSTACK-51) Outdated docs and license data present in awsapi

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-51?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Prachi Damle reassigned CLOUDSTACK-51: -- Assignee: David Nalley (was: Prachi Damle) Assigning to David to explain what shoul

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-51) Outdated docs and license data present in awsapi

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-51?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13453505#comment-13453505 ] Prachi Damle commented on CLOUDSTACK-51: I have removed release-notes.* How d

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-53) CloudBridge installation pieces present, deprecated?

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-53?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13453502#comment-13453502 ] Prachi Damle commented on CLOUDSTACK-53: I have removed all these files - since

[jira] [Resolved] (CLOUDSTACK-53) CloudBridge installation pieces present, deprecated?

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-53?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Prachi Damle resolved CLOUDSTACK-53. Resolution: Fixed > CloudBridge installation pieces present, deprecated? > -

[jira] [Assigned] (CLOUDSTACK-80) /ovm is empty

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-80?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alex Huang reassigned CLOUDSTACK-80: Assignee: Pradeep Soundararajan (was: edison su) > /ovm is empty > - >

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-22) Sign the release artifacts

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-22?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alex Huang updated CLOUDSTACK-22: - Fix Version/s: (was: pre-4.0.0) 4.0.0 > Sign the release artifacts

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-12) Audit Review Board

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-12?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alex Huang updated CLOUDSTACK-12: - Fix Version/s: (was: pre-4.0.0) 4.0.0 > Audit Review Board > --

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-79) CloudStack 3.0.4: firewall rules not restored on KVM host

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-79?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13453429#comment-13453429 ] Wido den Hollander commented on CLOUDSTACK-79: -- Oh, sorry, I didn't make t

Re: [utils.crypt.DBEncryptionUtil] (main:null) Error while decrypting: true

On 09/11/2012 11:15 PM, Edison Su wrote: On my 4.0 setup, the value of "init" is encrypted. Do you upgrade from a fresh install 3.0.2 installation? From the code, in 3.0.2, the value is already encrypted. My 3.0.2 install was fresh and I upgraded an existing database from 3.0.2 to 4.0 with

Re: Do we still need to patch the SystemVM ISO on the management server?

On 09/11/2012 10:10 PM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: On 9/11/12 12:55 PM, "Wido den Hollander" wrote: Hi, Currently the management server does some magic stuff with systemvm.iso like injecting keys into it with injectkeys.sh on boot. However, is this still required? I can't find any reference

RE: [utils.crypt.DBEncryptionUtil] (main:null) Error while decrypting: true

On my 4.0 setup, the value of "init" is encrypted. Do you upgrade from a fresh install 3.0.2 installation? From the code, in 3.0.2, the value is already encrypted. > -Original Message- > From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl] > Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 12:11 PM > To: c

Re: Review Request: AutoScale. Aligning the NetScaler response time counter, and correcting duration check against interval

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6895/ --- (Updated Sept. 11, 2012, 9:11 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep Singh

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-79) CloudStack 3.0.4: firewall rules not restored on KVM host

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-79?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13453379#comment-13453379 ] Vladimir Ostrovsky commented on CLOUDSTACK-79: -- Thanks, Wido! Can you ple

Re: Do we still need to patch the SystemVM ISO on the management server?

On 9/11/12 12:55 PM, "Wido den Hollander" wrote: >Hi, > >Currently the management server does some magic stuff with systemvm.iso >like injecting keys into it with injectkeys.sh on boot. > >However, is this still required? I can't find any reference that we >transfer this modified ISO from the m

Do we still need to patch the SystemVM ISO on the management server?

Hi, Currently the management server does some magic stuff with systemvm.iso like injecting keys into it with injectkeys.sh on boot. However, is this still required? I can't find any reference that we transfer this modified ISO from the management server to the Hypervisor, do we? As it seems

Re: Review Request: Add helper for DAO based on podId

> On Sept. 11, 2012, 6:05 p.m., Alex Huang wrote: > > What is this change for? There was no method to get list of VMs by podId, count by podId etc. The patch adds them. They will be used in restartNetwork and may be useful elsewhere. - Rohit

Re: [DISCUSS] Install.sh vs. pacakge repos

On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 8:02 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote: > > > On 09/11/2012 08:56 PM, Noah Slater wrote: > >> Wido, see my comments about the problems with hosting an APT repository on >> ASF infra. >> >> > Yes, our e-mails crossed. Yours arrived while I was typing mine. > > > * Can't think o

Review Request: fix patch disks from reproducing like rabbits

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7040/ --- Review request for cloudstack. Description --- Issue: System VMs on KVM cre

[utils.crypt.DBEncryptionUtil] (main:null) Error while decrypting: true

Hi, I upgraded my 3.0.2 database to 4.0 today and tried to run the latest code on it. After long trial and error for other issues I'm stuck at the last one: 2012-09-11 17:56:26,387 DEBUG [utils.crypt.DBEncryptionUtil] (main:null) Error while decrypting: true 2012-09-11 17:56:26,388 ERROR [cl

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-80) /ovm is empty

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-80?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sudha Ponnaganti updated CLOUDSTACK-80: --- Affects Version/s: pre-4.0.0 Assignee: edison su > /ovm is empty

Re: [DISCUSS] Install.sh vs. pacakge repos

On 09/11/2012 08:56 PM, Noah Slater wrote: Wido, see my comments about the problems with hosting an APT repository on ASF infra. Yes, our e-mails crossed. Yours arrived while I was typing mine. * Can't think of a way it would work with the mirrors. * If you don't use the mirrors, infra mig

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-80) /ovm is empty

sebastien goasguen created CLOUDSTACK-80: Summary: /ovm is empty Key: CLOUDSTACK-80 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-80 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug

Re: [DISCUSS] Install.sh vs. pacakge repos

Wido, see my comments about the problems with hosting an APT repository on ASF infra. * Can't think of a way it would work with the mirrors. * If you don't use the mirrors, infra might not like the bandwidth. However: * Do we already host repositories for Java? * Can we set something up for debs

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-75) Install: need to changed Installer description "found cllud.com in the installer description"

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-75?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13453300#comment-13453300 ] Chip Childers commented on CLOUDSTACK-75: - So I have the fix as a patch, but I

Re: ant debug failed to launch

clean-tomcat does not clean out the $CATALINA_HOME/libs directory. But even after manually deleting all the copied-over libs there, 'ant deploy-server' re-introduces the same problems. On 9/11/12 11:34 AM, "Edison Su" wrote: >Ant clean-tomcat doesn't work? > >> -Original Message- >> Fro

RE: [DISCUSS] Install.sh vs. pacakge repos

> -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 11:23 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Install.sh vs. pacakge repos > > On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 11:45 AM, David Nalley wrote: > > On Tue

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-78) Cloudstack Agent installation failed with jsvc package dependancy error

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-78?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alex Huang updated CLOUDSTACK-78: - Fix Version/s: pre-4.0.0 > Cloudstack Agent installation failed with jsvc package dependan

[jira] [Assigned] (CLOUDSTACK-75) Install: need to changed Installer description "found cllud.com in the installer description"

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-75?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alex Huang reassigned CLOUDSTACK-75: Assignee: Pradeep Soundararajan (was: edison su) > Install: need to changed Install

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-75) Install: need to changed Installer description "found cllud.com in the installer description"

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-75?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alex Huang updated CLOUDSTACK-75: - Fix Version/s: pre-4.0.0 > Install: need to changed Installer description "found cllud.com

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-79) CloudStack 3.0.4: firewall rules not restored on KVM host

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-79?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alex Huang updated CLOUDSTACK-79: - Fix Version/s: 4.1.0 > CloudStack 3.0.4: firewall rules not restored on KVM host > ---

Re: [DISCUSS] Install.sh vs. pacakge repos

On 09/11/2012 05:45 PM, David Nalley wrote: On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 8:23 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote: On 09/11/2012 12:16 PM, Suresh Sadhu wrote: HI All, Installer fail to read the cloud packages and MS installation on Ubuntu 12.04 was not successful(No packages were installed) Raised a

Re: [DISCUSS] Install.sh vs. pacakge repos

David, just to address infra's original comment to you. The benefit of having a healthy downstream is that our software will be properly integrated into the respective OS. If we maintain our own debs, RPMs, etc, there will be some disconnect there. One option is to cultivate a healthy relationship

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-32) Resolve licensing question for configuration files stored in the patches folder

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-32?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13453289#comment-13453289 ] Chiradeep Vittal commented on CLOUDSTACK-32: No response yet as of Sep 11

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-77) console proxy display issues

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-77?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alex Huang updated CLOUDSTACK-77: - Fix Version/s: 4.1.0 > console proxy display issues > > >

[jira] [Assigned] (CLOUDSTACK-77) console proxy display issues

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-77?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alex Huang reassigned CLOUDSTACK-77: Assignee: Fang Wang (was: edison su) This looks like it's a network issue. Fang, can y

Re: [DISCUSS] Install.sh vs. pacakge repos

Your source distribution will always be your primary distribution, and from that it should be possible to build any of the binary distributions. This is where you would typically have things such as "install.sh" scripts. Advanced users are your audience. >From this package, it should be possible t

Re: Removing .classpath and .project files for the modules.

Yes i would like to do it in that way. On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 12:05 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Edison Su wrote: > > > > > >> -Original Message- > >> From: Manikanta Kattamuri [mailto:manikanta.kattam...@sungard.com] > >> Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2012

RE: [ASFCS40] bug count

The bug count for the pre-4.0 is now at 32. However, even though the bugs are assigned, each one remains in Open status. If you're actively working on a bug please change the status so we know you're working on them. Thank you! --Alex > -Original Message- > From: Alex Huang > Sent: M

Re: Review Request: Removing the older xenapi jar and adding an ant target to build one from the source

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6873/#review11347 --- Ship it! Ship It! - anthony xu On Aug. 31, 2012, 4:29 p.m., Devde

Re: Removing .classpath and .project files for the modules.

On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Edison Su wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Manikanta Kattamuri [mailto:manikanta.kattam...@sungard.com] >> Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 10:36 AM >> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org >> Subject: Removing .classpath and .project files for

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-79) CloudStack 3.0.4: firewall rules not restored on KVM host

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-79?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13453272#comment-13453272 ] Wido den Hollander commented on CLOUDSTACK-79: -- This is known, the securit

RE: ant debug failed to launch

Ant clean-tomcat doesn't work? > -Original Message- > From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com] > Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 11:16 AM > To: CloudStack DeveloperList > Subject: Re: ant debug failed to launch > > To get even further, here are the additional steps: >

Re: Review Request: Support for local data disk feature. (CS-14277)

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6431/#review11346 --- Ship it! Ship It! - anthony xu On Sept. 11, 2012, 9:50 a.m., Kous

RE: Removing .classpath and .project files for the modules.

> -Original Message- > From: Manikanta Kattamuri [mailto:manikanta.kattam...@sungard.com] > Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 10:36 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Removing .classpath and .project files for the modules. > > Hi, > > There are .classpath and .proje

RE: [ASFCS40]Drive to clear the review board...

Hi everyone, Here is the third pass. We cleared quite a few reviews yesterday but there were more submitted so we actually have more. The good news the action for about a quarter of the reviews is to "Commit it" or "Mark as submitted". Please take a look. Especially the people with reviews

Re: [DISCUSS] Install.sh vs. pacakge repos

On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 11:45 AM, David Nalley wrote: > On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 8:23 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote: >> On 09/11/2012 12:16 PM, Suresh Sadhu wrote: >>> >>> HI All, >>> >>> Installer fail to read the cloud packages and MS installation on Ubuntu >>> 12.04 was not successful(No packag

Re: ant debug failed to launch

To get even further, here are the additional steps: rm $CATALINA_HOME/lib/axis*.jar rm $CATALINA_HOME/lib/slf4j* rm $CATALINA_HOME/lib/*jcl* rm $CATALINA_HOME/webapps7080/awsapi/WEB-INF/lib/log4j-1.2.15.jar Not sure where the problem is -- maven or ant. On 9/11/12 10:28 AM, "Chiradeep Vittal"

[jira] [Resolved] (CLOUDSTACK-71) Upgrade checker needs modification to allow for minor upgrades to work

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-71?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] edison su resolved CLOUDSTACK-71. - Resolution: Fixed It's the issue of build system, passed in a wrong package version, fixed in

Re: Review Request: Set correct version for database version check

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7013/#review11343 --- We just need to fix the parameter passed into build system. Right now

Re: Review Request: Add helper for DAO based on podId

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7017/#review11342 --- What is this change for? - Alex Huang On Sept. 11, 2012, 1:45 p.m.

Re: Review Request: After 3.0.x we will use Uuid for vm-id and instance-id. For pre 3.0.x, keep them intact (uuid is null).

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7025/#review11338 --- Both methods generateVmDataCommand() contain a lot of duplicated code

Removing .classpath and .project files for the modules.

Hi, There are .classpath and .project files in each module present. I found them to be eclipse configuration files or we using them anywhere else (i am not much acquainted with the codebase yet) . Problem is these classpath files are having lib jar locations from deps module. As the codebase is mo

Review Request: After 3.0.x we will use Uuid for vm-id and instance-id. For pre 3.0.x, keep them intact (uuid is null).

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7025/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Alena Prokharchyk. Description --- For pr

Re: ant debug failed to launch

I found that I had to remove $CATALINA_HOME/lib/servlet-api-2.3.jar to move past this error. On 9/11/12 7:04 AM, "Gavin Lee" wrote: >My environment was ok yesterday for ant debug before I update the source >code. >I use root account, I know it's not good, I checked both CATALINA_HOME >and src fo

[jira] [Resolved] (CLOUDSTACK-16) Final release version number changes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-16?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Pradeep Soundararajan resolved CLOUDSTACK-16. - Resolution: Duplicate CLOUDSTACK-44 > Final release v

[jira] [Assigned] (CLOUDSTACK-27) JARs are still present in the tools directory

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-27?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Pradeep Soundararajan reassigned CLOUDSTACK-27: --- Assignee: edison su (was: Pradeep Soundararajan) Hi Edison, as pe

[jira] [Resolved] (CLOUDSTACK-21) Create a secondary binary build containing KVM support

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-21?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Pradeep Soundararajan resolved CLOUDSTACK-21. - Resolution: Won't Fix Already, KVM is made as a default build option.

Re: Review Request: CS-16104: Improve restart network behaviour for basic network

On 9/11/12 7:42 AM, "Rohit Yadav" wrote: > > > > > > > > > > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/6781/ > > > > > > On September 10th, 2012, 9:31 p.m., Alena Prokharchyk wrote: > > 1) Have to hange the

  1   2   >