Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 30, 2012, at 10:14 PM, "Rohit Yadav" wrote:
> Hi,
>
>>>
>>> I tried to import and use two devclouds, but for some reason I was not
>>> able to add the first host itself. Please help debug, if at all this
>>> idea seems worth exploring. Also, as Chiradeep suggested
Hi,
>>
>> I tried to import and use two devclouds, but for some reason I was not
>> able to add the first host itself. Please help debug, if at all this
>> idea seems worth exploring. Also, as Chiradeep suggested in an email
>> previously, would n't be a good option to have a single XenServer/NF
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6223/
---
Review request for cloudstack.
Description
---
Adding Apache license, DTD f
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6222/
---
(Updated July 31, 2012, 4:16 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack.
Description
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6222/
---
Review request for cloudstack.
Description
---
Adding Apache license header
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6193/
---
(Updated July 31, 2012, 4:12 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack.
Changes
I've not found an alternate OSS java library for vsphere except vijava. It
definitely is in wide use, despite lack of unit tests and sensible
logging. Wins by default and also historically good support from Steve Jin.
-A
On Jul 30, 2012 7:29 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
> David,
>
> I can vouch
David,
I can vouch for vi java. It's a much more rational API for VMware
integration than the native SDK, and we can always ask the author
(Steve Jin) for support if we need it. He's a great guy, and really
does a good job with that project. We use the library here at SunGard
almost exclusively
Hi folks,
I know I keep beating this drum until it sounds absurd, but I
discovered this blog post [1] today which reinforces to me that vijava
might be a suitable alternative for the VMware SDK, and as a bonus
gets rid of the proprietary licensing that the VMware SDK brings along
with it. Obviousl
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Chiradeep Vittal
wrote:
>
>
> On 7/25/12 10:52 PM, "Ishimoto, Ryu" wrote:
>
>>On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Chiradeep Vittal <
>>chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Also note that in order to support hotplug and hot-detach of nics, we
>>>need
>>> com
Hi all,
After my draft release plan last week, I've taken the feedback that I got
(thanks for that, everyone) and I think we're ready to commit to this plan now.
The timescales are very tight, but that's the aim - get something out as soon
as we can, to make our first release as an Apache-incub
Folks:
I took a first swing at this. Please do proof it and either add
additional content, or suggest it here.
This is due on Wednesday, so please don't procrastinate.
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/August2012
--David
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Marvin wrote:
>
>
> Dear podling,
>
> T
It would be great if we could look at creating a system (even just a utility
script) that would allow us to re-attach a secondary storage server and
salvage existing templates housed on it.
I'm thinking it could crawl the template tree and prompt the user for a new
z/p/c to attach the templates
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Mike McClurg wrote:
> On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 4:12 AM, David Nalley wrote:
>> I just looked at xenserverjava (the version shipped today 5.6.100-1,
>> and 6.0.0-1)
>>
>> However, while there is a copy of ASLv2 in the source, it does so
>> because some dependencies
Thanks, now working fine.
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 8:01 AM, Edison Su wrote:
> Sorry, forget to check in some files.
> Checkout out the latest master, will be fixed.
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: to...@midokura.jp [mailto:to...@midokura.jp] On Behalf Of Tomoe
>> Sugihara
>> Sent: Monday
Sorry, forget to check in some files.
Checkout out the latest master, will be fixed.
> -Original Message-
> From: to...@midokura.jp [mailto:to...@midokura.jp] On Behalf Of Tomoe
> Sugihara
> Sent: Monday, July 30, 2012 3:45 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: KVM co
> -Original Message-
> From: John Kinsella [mailto:j...@stratosec.co]
> Sent: Monday, July 30, 2012 1:30 PM
> To:
> Subject: Re: Please remember to close review board requests
>
> [Snip]
>
> The patch submitter has to mark the issue as closed - as a committer I
> do not have the ability t
Hi Edison,
You may already know this but, now compile-server is broken:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 7:03 AM, Edisocompile-server:
[mkdir] Created dir:
/home/tomoe/code/incubator-cloudstack/target/classes/cloud-server.jar
[echo] Compiling /home/tomoe/code/incubator-cloudstack/server/src
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 7:03 AM, Koushik Das wrote:
>> Yes the idea is to have local storage setting at zone level. Currently it is
>> a global setting (use.local.storage).
>>
>> -Koushik
>>
>Even zone-level seems too high - why isn't this at the cluster level?
>
>--David
+1 . It makes more se
KVM code is moved to plugins/hypervisor/kvm, a new jar, cloud-kvm.jar is
created for all the java classes used by kvm code.
> -Original Message-
> From: Edison Su [mailto:edison...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 6:00 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: KV
Hi...
I was talking to David Nalley over IRC and we spotted two main tasks
that we should put our focus on in the coming 1-2 months and
more preferably the coming month:
1- Finishing the INFRA related tasks (namely JIRA)
2- Getting our first release out
With these tasks done, provided that we
On 7/30/12 1:28 PM, "Edison Su" wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Ewan Mellor [mailto:ewan.mel...@eu.citrix.com]
>> Sent: Monday, July 30, 2012 1:01 PM
>> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: RE: Please remember to close review board requests
>>
>> > -Original
On Jul 30, 2012, at 1:01 PM, Ewan Mellor wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: John Kinsella [mailto:j...@stratosec.co]
>> Sent: Monday, July 30, 2012 10:26 AM
>> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Please remember to close review board requests
>>
>> Guys and gals - if you
> -Original Message-
> From: Ewan Mellor [mailto:ewan.mel...@eu.citrix.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 30, 2012 1:01 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Please remember to close review board requests
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: John Kinsella [mailto:j...@
> -Original Message-
> From: John Kinsella [mailto:j...@stratosec.co]
> Sent: Monday, July 30, 2012 10:26 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Please remember to close review board requests
>
> Guys and gals - if you have a request in ReviewBoard that's been marked
> "Sh
It may not be obvious but the default ebtables rules (when CSP is
installed) is to drop ipv6
util.pread2(['ebtables', '-A', 'DEFAULT_EBTABLES', '-p', 'IPv6',
'-j', 'DROP'])
However, your change is a good idea as well.
On 7/30/12 4:20 AM, "Hugo Trippaers" wrote:
>Hey guys,
>
>The curre
I see mentions of branding in a few build.xml files, particularly under plugins…
On Jul 30, 2012, at 7:12 AM, David Nalley wrote:
Hi folks, please take a look at:
build/deploy/branding/
I am guessing we need to purge all of those - and given that the
'default' contains a VMOps logo I am guessin
Might want to tweak the "setup ip6tables" logic to check first to see if any
rules were in place?
On Jul 30, 2012, at 7:44 AM, Hugo Trippaers wrote:
Hey Chip,
Interesting, which version are you using?
My box:
Linux XX 2.6.32.12-0.7.1.xs6.0.2.542.170665xen #1 SMP Tue Jan 17 15:14:24
EST 20
Guys and gals - if you have a request in ReviewBoard that's been marked "Ship
It!" - it might not be obvious, but you need to go back and close the request
by marking it "Submitted."
Please remember to do this after momentarily basking in the joy of having your
patch accepted. :)
That'll save
David,
I am following it up. Should have the details in a day or two. So what's the
requirement - making the jars available at a publically accessible URL with
license text around it should suffice?
Thanks,
Ram
> -Original Message-
> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
> Sent: 3
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/5661/#review9601
---
Pranav: Can you close this request as 'submitted'?
- John Kinsella
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/5742/#review9600
---
Jayapal: Can you close this request as 'submitted'?
- John Kinsella
I think it is always better to give control to the administrator on whether to
enable/disable local storage in a cluster/zone level. If local storage pool is
available by default then it may be difficult to manage all of them in case of
a cluster with large number of hosts. Also in some cases it
This is definitely a good suggestion. If the community feels that having the
setting at the cluster level makes more sense then I will take that into
account.
Thanks,
Koushik
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2012 6:33 PM
T
> -Original Message-
> From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik@citrix.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 30, 2012 4:04 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Local storage support for data volumes
>
> Yes the idea is to have local storage setting at zone level. Currently
> it i
On 7/29/12 9:31 PM, "Tommy Aditya Lawanto" wrote:
>I'm getting this error when i try to get password from a vm using
>password-enabled template (through API) :
>
>
> [error] => No password for VM with id '70' found.
>
>
>I've tried resetting the password using management server, and it works
>fin
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 30, 2012 6:02 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Update on wrapping DevCloud into a Vagrant Box
>
> Edison,
>
> I'm working on converting the second phase of the d
> -Original Message-
> From: Rohit Yadav
> Sent: Monday, July 30, 2012 5:12 AM
> To: Edison Su
> Cc: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Development with multiple devclouds
>
> Hi Edison,
>
> > Thanks for your sharing. Could you help to write up a wiki page about
> multip
What's the kvm host os? Centos/RHEL 6.2? can you stop/start the vm, then
attach/detach the volume, will it work?
> -Original Message-
> From: Tommy Aditya Lawanto [mailto:to...@wowrack.com]
> Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2012 11:55 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Fai
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Hugo Trippaers
wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I just pushed a fix that will disable IPv6 immediately and reinstate the
> disable-ipv6 file. This should take care of the current situation for people
> with the support pack. So far my testing has revealed no adverse effects.
>
Hey,
I just pushed a fix that will disable IPv6 immediately and reinstate the
disable-ipv6 file. This should take care of the current situation for people
with the support pack. So far my testing has revealed no adverse effects.
Anybody any idea why IPv6 support is enabled by the cloud support
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6200/#review9592
---
Tomoe - is there a bug filed for this? If not, can you create one?
-
Indeed - I'm testing in an advanced networking zone, so we didn't
bother doing the support pack installation. That would be the
difference.
I think your scripts will work, excluding the error condition that my
environment introduces. IMO - if that pack isn't required, then we
should expect to se
Hey Chip,
Think I found it. Do you have the cloud support pack
(http://download.cloud.com/releases/3.0.1/XS-6.0.2/xenserver-cloud-supp.tgz )
installed? My guess is you don't.
During the firstboot of xen the file " /etc/modprobe.d/disable-ipv6" is removed
by that pack. This enables IPv6, which
Looks like we are using the same version, but different configuration?:
# uname -a
Linux xshost2 2.6.32.12-0.7.1.xs6.0.2.542.170665xen #1 SMP Tue Jan 17
15:14:24 EST 2012 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
# cat /etc/redhat-release
XenServer release 6.0.2-53456p (xenenterprise)
# ls /proc/sys/net/ipv6/con
Hey Chip,
Interesting, which version are you using?
My box:
Linux XX 2.6.32.12-0.7.1.xs6.0.2.542.170665xen #1 SMP Tue Jan 17 15:14:24
EST 2012 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
[root@X ~]# cat /etc/redhat-release
XenServer release 6.0.2-53456p (xenenterprise)
[root@X ~]# ls /proc/sys/net/ipv
Hi folks, please take a look at:
build/deploy/branding/
I am guessing we need to purge all of those - and given that the
'default' contains a VMOps logo I am guessing this dates back to 2.1.x
or earlier. (actually, I don't recall 2.1.x having this either, so
maybe earlier than that)
--David
The latest Xen Server install seems to have IPv6 disabled (just
checked in my lab). Is it enabled in XCP?
(I may be showing my Xen ignorance here)
- chip
On Jul 30, 2012, at 9:24 AM, Hugo Trippaers
wrote:
> Hey Chip,
>
> Yeah, I want help :-)
>
> I just committed the sysctl.conf changes for th
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Ram Ganesh wrote:
> David,
>
> We are final phase of deciding which license to follow - MIT or BSD. I think
> once the decision is taken we should make the jars available from an URL
>
Ram,
Any idea the timeline on this? Proposed code freeze is ~1 week away.
--
Hey David,
This the part from the SLA regarding distribution of the netapp SDK:
-- snip --
No distribution or redistribution rights are granted by this license, except as
specified in this paragraph. Notwithstanding the terms of this Agreement to
the contrary, certain of the components of the P
David,
We are final phase of deciding which license to follow - MIT or BSD. I think
once the decision is taken we should make the jars available from an URL
Thanks,
Ram
> -Original Message-
> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
> Sent: 29 July 2012 03:10
> To: cloudstack-dev@incu
Hey Chip,
Yeah, I want help :-)
I just committed the sysctl.conf changes for the systemvm. This morning i
applied them to my test environment and they do the job.
We could add the actual sysctl command to the vmops next to adding the IPv6
ip6tables statements I think.
Cheers,
Hugo
-Ori
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 7:32 AM, Hugo Trippaers
wrote:
> By the way, we might want to add the same configuration to vmops for
> XenServer.
>
> Currently it is possible to have a tenant vm send a router advertisement on
> the isolated lan that is picked up by XenServer. Even though XenServer only
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 7:20 AM, Hugo Trippaers
wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> The current systemvm has IPv6 enabled including autoconfiguration. This means
> that if the machine is placed in an IPv6 enabled network (or somebody starts
> sending router advertisements) the VM's based on the system vm wil
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 8:40 AM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 7:03 AM, Koushik Das wrote:
>> Yes the idea is to have local storage setting at zone level. Currently it is
>> a global setting (use.local.storage).
>>
>> -Koushik
>>
>
> Even zone-level seems too high - why isn't thi
Edison,
I'm working on converting the second phase of the devcloudsetup.sh
script to puppet, but I ran into this issue.
Looking for help understanding what you were doing here:
In this section of the script:
107 echo "configure xcp"
108 wget $fileSvr/echo -P /usr/lib/xcp/plugins/
109
This changes needs to be propagated to the upgrade scripts as well,
otherwise the item you removed will persist in upgrades.
--David
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 2:47 AM, wrote:
> Updated Branches:
> refs/heads/master 3313cc4a8 -> 894407caa
>
>
> rrq 5839: This table should not have a contraint on
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 7:03 AM, Koushik Das wrote:
> Yes the idea is to have local storage setting at zone level. Currently it is
> a global setting (use.local.storage).
>
> -Koushik
>
Even zone-level seems too high - why isn't this at the cluster level?
--David
Hi Edison,
> Thanks for your sharing. Could you help to write up a wiki page about
> multiple devcloud setup?
Yes, wrote a page here:
http://wiki.cloudstack.org/display/COMM/DIY+DevCloud+Setup
Though the proof of concept setup works (with a lot of system crashes) and the
idea of multiple devc
By the way, we might want to add the same configuration to vmops for XenServer.
Currently it is possible to have a tenant vm send a router advertisement on the
isolated lan that is picked up by XenServer. Even though XenServer only has a
bridge interface in the tenant lan that interface will be
Hey guys,
The current systemvm has IPv6 enabled including autoconfiguration. This means
that if the machine is placed in an IPv6 enabled network (or somebody starts
sending router advertisements) the VM's based on the system vm will
autoconfigure the interface. This means a possible way to bypa
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6199/#review9588
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Kishan Kavala
On July 30, 2012, 6:16 a.m., Roh
Yes the idea is to have local storage setting at zone level. Currently it is a
global setting (use.local.storage).
-Koushik
-Original Message-
From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:prasanna.santha...@citrix.com]
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2012 4:13 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subj
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 06:23:44AM -0400, Koushik Das wrote:
> Currently in CS only root volume can be created on local storage.
> This feature is to support creation of data volumes on local
> storage. Please refer to [1] for the details. There is already a bug
> CS-14277 created for this. Reviews
Currently in CS only root volume can be created on local storage. This feature
is to support creation of data volumes on local storage. Please refer to [1]
for the details. There is already a bug CS-14277 created for this.
Reviews/comments?
Thanks,
Koushik
[1] http://wiki.cloudstack.org/displa
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6203/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Prachi Damle.
Description
---
In CloudSta
66 matches
Mail list logo
