> -----Original Message----- > From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik....@citrix.com] > Sent: Monday, July 30, 2012 4:04 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: Local storage support for data volumes > > Yes the idea is to have local storage setting at zone level. Currently > it is a global setting (use.local.storage).
How about get rid of use.local.storage at all? Local storage as a storage pool resource, by default, is always available on each hypervisor host. CloudStack mgt server should not hide the existing available resource. To use local storage or not, that all depends on disk/service offering. > > -Koushik > > -----Original Message----- > From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:prasanna.santha...@citrix.com] > Sent: Monday, July 30, 2012 4:13 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: Local storage support for data volumes > > On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 06:23:44AM -0400, Koushik Das wrote: > > Currently in CS only root volume can be created on local storage. > > This feature is to support creation of data volumes on local storage. > > Please refer to [1] for the details. There is already a bug > > CS-14277 created for this. Reviews/comments? > > > > Thanks, > > Koushik > > > > [1] > > > http://wiki.cloudstack.org/display/RelOps/Local+storage+for+data+volum > > es > > First question from a skim of the spec: > > Why is the `data_center` table getting a new column about local storage? > Seems out of place for it to be there. Can this not be a global > setting/ Or are you looking to control this setting per data center? > > > -- > Prasanna.,
