Hi folks:
We've got some folks interested in l10n - and I suppose we need to
discuss how and where that will happen. Today CloudStack uses
transifex.net as a service. The big issue I don't understand is
whether it satisfies any legal requirements from ASF's perspective for
what is effectively a pa
On this note, I've put up a quick workflow document on the wiki:
http://wiki.cloudstack.org/display/dev/Git+workflow+in+the+brave+new+world
Please feel free to either converse here, or make changes on the wiki
itself (it's a wiki, edit boldly). None of this is set in stone, this
is just what rolle
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Kevin Kluge wrote:
> Also, I think we should take the pre-existing release codenames (Bonita,
> Burbank, and Campo) and reserve them for Citrix commercial releases. The
> community is moving to a different release cycle (with presumably different
> release con
On 5/24/12 2:02 PM, "David Nalley" wrote:
>On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 4:54 PM, Alena Prokharchyk
> wrote:
>> On 5/24/12 7:17 AM, "David Nalley" wrote:
>>
>>>Just an FYI:
>>>
>>>Mohammad and I are going to freeze github/git.cloud.com's 3.0.x and
>>>master branches this weekend while we attempt to mi
Also, I think we should take the pre-existing release codenames (Bonita,
Burbank, and Campo) and reserve them for Citrix commercial releases. The
community is moving to a different release cycle (with presumably different
release content) than Citrix had planned, and of course it can come up w
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 4:54 PM, Alena Prokharchyk
wrote:
> On 5/24/12 7:17 AM, "David Nalley" wrote:
>
>>Just an FYI:
>>
>>Mohammad and I are going to freeze github/git.cloud.com's 3.0.x and
>>master branches this weekend while we attempt to migrate them to the
>>ASF repo. The ASF repo will rema
On 5/24/12 7:17 AM, "David Nalley" wrote:
>Just an FYI:
>
>Mohammad and I are going to freeze github/git.cloud.com's 3.0.x and
>master branches this weekend while we attempt to migrate them to the
>ASF repo. The ASF repo will remain frozen until we can conclude a vote
>(I understand that the PPMC
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
>
> On 25/05/2012, at 12:17 AM, David Nalley wrote:
>
>> Just an FYI:
>>
>> Mohammad and I are going to freeze github/git.cloud.com's 3.0.x and
>> master branches this weekend while we attempt to migrate them to the
>> ASF repo. The ASF repo wil
On 25/05/2012, at 12:17 AM, David Nalley wrote:
> Just an FYI:
>
> Mohammad and I are going to freeze github/git.cloud.com's 3.0.x and
> master branches this weekend while we attempt to migrate them to the
> ASF repo. The ASF repo will remain frozen until we can conclude a vote
> (I understand t
On 05/24/2012 10:45 AM, David Nalley wrote:
So I think we have consensus around a few things already - lets
highlight those:
* Time based releases
* Versioning scheme:
X.Y.Z
- X : increases when there is a "major" change in architecture or some
major new feature
- Y : increases with every relea
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Robert Schweikert wrote:
> On 05/24/2012 10:17 AM, David Nalley wrote:
>>
>> Just an FYI:
>>
>> Mohammad and I are going to freeze github/git.cloud.com's 3.0.x and
>> master branches this weekend while we attempt to migrate them to the
>> ASF repo. The ASF repo wi
I agree with George ... I think first Apache release should be 4.0.0.
Matthew
On 5/24/2012 10:52 AM, George Reese wrote:
I think the first Apache release should be 4.0.0.
Also, in terms of managing release life cycle, I like the Ubuntu approach.Not
specifically in their numbering, but in the
On 05/24/2012 10:17 AM, David Nalley wrote:
Just an FYI:
Mohammad and I are going to freeze github/git.cloud.com's 3.0.x and
master branches this weekend while we attempt to migrate them to the
ASF repo. The ASF repo will remain frozen until we can conclude a vote
(I understand that the PPMC mus
I think the first Apache release should be 4.0.0.
Also, in terms of managing release life cycle, I like the Ubuntu approach.Not
specifically in their numbering, but in the predictability of what has long
term support and what doesn't.
-George
On May 24, 2012, at 9:45 AM, David Nalley wrote:
>
So I think we have consensus around a few things already - lets
highlight those:
* Time based releases
* Versioning scheme:
X.Y.Z
- X : increases when there is a "major" change in architecture or some
major new feature
- Y : increases with every release every 6 month (reset when X increases)
- Z
Just an FYI:
Mohammad and I are going to freeze github/git.cloud.com's 3.0.x and
master branches this weekend while we attempt to migrate them to the
ASF repo. The ASF repo will remain frozen until we can conclude a vote
(I understand that the PPMC must certify/accept the code drop), after
which t
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:39 PM, David Chamard wrote:
> Alex,
>
> Very interesting since we are considering improving the openstack swift s3
> middleware. We are also interested and will be testing heavily the
> cloudstack integration with swift for backend templates/snapshots
>
> https://githu
Hi folks,
The June monthly report[1] is due in just under two weeks. Anyone want
to step up and write the first draft? Just one note, if you don't
already have write privileges to the incubator wiki, you'll need to
request such permissions by sending an email to
gene...@incubator.apache.org.
--Da
Alex Huang and I are in Beijing for a CloudStack dev camp and a couple of
presentations at the China Cloud Computing Conference. The dev camp was
Tuesday at a local hotel. We had 75 registrations and 73 actual attendees,
including several people that flew in from various parts of China. Ale
19 matches
Mail list logo
