On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Kevin Kluge <[email protected]> wrote: > Also, I think we should take the pre-existing release codenames (Bonita, > Burbank, and Campo) and reserve them for Citrix commercial releases. The > community is moving to a different release cycle (with presumably different > release content) than Citrix had planned, and of course it can come up with > new codenames if desired. This clear assignment will help reduce confusion > as we split Citrix and Apache release cycles. It will require further > scrubbing in the bug db and on the wiki as these codenames are referenced > there. > > -kevin >
Agreed - there already seems to be consensus (though it's still early in the conversation) on us breaking the existing versioning scheme and moving to 4.0.0 as the initial release. We can work on cleanup of all of those references as we go forward - though I don't necessarily see it as a blocker to release - and want to really focus on that as our next 'big goal'. --David
