On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 7:52 PM, Mike Perham wrote:
>
> I would like to see more practical screencasts. RH's Clojure talks
> are interesting but only at a high level. I'd like to see a
> screencast on Emacs/SLIME because I have no idea what the hell it is
> or what it offers over a basic screen
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 3:20 AM, Jan Rychter wrote:
> I don't buy it. When you start using Python, nobody handholds you so
> that you can pick an editor. You just use whatever you have. So what's
> the deal here?
At least on Windows, Python comes with IDLE, which is surprisingly
full-featured gi
I agree,
IDE wise, SciTe or Vim, a running REPL in a shell and load-file just
does it for us...
Years ago I was using Emacs but left it for other IDEs (Eclipse) for so
long
that I would need a few weeks to get back into it.
Not having the time in the last 6 months to dedicate getting fluent
again
I would like to see more practical screencasts. RH's Clojure talks
are interesting but only at a high level. I'd like to see a
screencast on Emacs/SLIME because I have no idea what the hell it is
or what it offers over a basic screencast.
Likewise, doing screencasts on macros, concurrency primi
Mibu
On Dec 18, 1:22 pm, Mibu wrote:
> On Dec 18, 2:37 pm, janus wrote:
>
> > I think I need a mentor!
>
> Come to the IRC channel (#clojure on irc.freenode.net). The people
> there are friendly, helpful, and surprisingly patient.
>
>
Thanks for your advice,however, if you wont mind I will ant
Hi,
On 18 Dez., 14:09, Mibu wrote:
> An editor for a lisp language is not just a text editor for the source
> that you then compile. It's an environment that interacts with a REPL.
We should stay on the carpet, shouldn't we? If you have such an
environment, fine. I use vim, which is undoubtedly
On Dec 18, 2:37 pm, janus wrote:
> I think I need a mentor!
Come to the IRC channel (#clojure on irc.freenode.net). The people
there are friendly, helpful, and surprisingly patient.
Mibu
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed
--- On Thu, 12/18/08, Mibu wrote:
> An editor for a lisp language is not just a text editor for
> the source that you then compile. It's an environment that
> interacts with a REPL. So people can't just use whatever
> they've been using.
Of course you can--there's no *requirement* that your edit
On Dec 18, 1:20 pm, Jan Rychter wrote:
> I don't buy it. When you start using Python, nobody handholds you so
> that you can pick an editor. You just use whatever you have. So what's
> the deal here?
An editor for a lisp language is not just a text editor for the source
that you then compile. It
Mibu,
Thanks for your post because it captures what I am passing through. I
have not done FP before and I am not even a great programmer, and with
FP comes a sea of concepts and abstracts I have not heard before.
These concepts and abstracts led me to conclude that FP is not made
for mere mortals
Regarding the editor part, Scite could be a good option, especially
for beginners.
It's a whole hell of a lot simpler than emacs and vim.
All you really have to do by way of configuration is go to "Options" -
> "Open User Options File" and paste in the following lines:
---
file.patterns.lisp=*
Mibu writes:
> I recommended clojure to a dozen friends or so and after a while none
> of them stuck with it. I know clojure being a lisp and being at the
> current development stage is not for everyone, but after I probed why
> people gave up with it I saw the barriers to entry were largely
> su
Good post! I have been going through the same problems myself. It
looks like enclojure is going to have a Netbeans 6.5 release very soon
(still alpha though). I've also tried to figure out the best way to
learn Clojure. After flailing about a bit, last night I printed out
all the documents on c
13 matches
Mail list logo
