Ok, thanks for all the answers :)
kl. 15:11:39 UTC+2 mandag 11. august 2014 skrev Moritz Ulrich følgende:
>
> Robin Heggelund Hansen > writes:
>
> Implementing non-trivial game-logic in core.logic or any other
> logic-programming system is likely harder than implementing the
> validation in Clo
Robin Heggelund Hansen writes:
Implementing non-trivial game-logic in core.logic or any other
logic-programming system is likely harder than implementing the
validation in Clojure, as you'd have to learn many new idioms and a
totally different programming style - but it's really mind-opening too.
Core.logic is just Clojure implementation of logic like programming and
actually you can use logic programming for chess games (the example is in
Prolog)
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9337074/what-is-the-neatest-prolog-implementation-for-conways-game-of-life
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 11:41 A
The idea was to implement the game rules (validating a move) using
core.logic, but I take it that isn't something core.logic would be suited
for?
kl. 11:42:18 UTC+2 mandag 11. august 2014 skrev puzzler følgende:
>
> I don't see how core.logic would apply here.
>
> You might be interested in a Ja
I don't see how core.logic would apply here.
You might be interested in a Java-based general game playing engine which
you can leverage from Clojure. Many take logical descriptions of the game
rules in LISP form.
http://www.ggp.org/
On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 3:51 AM, Robin Heggelund Hansen wrot
I have no idea, but I'm also interested in the answer. ^_^
On Saturday, August 9, 2014 12:51:20 PM UTC+2, Robin Heggelund Hansen wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> I'm starting a new project now, where users are presented with a set of
> boardgames (chess, checkers, othello...) which they then can play together
Hi.
I'm starting a new project now, where users are presented with a set of
boardgames (chess, checkers, othello...) which they then can play together
online.
Does it make sense to implement the game logic using core.logic, and does
it transfer well to cljs (i'd like to share logic between back
