Re: Where is the Clojure 1.0 API documentation?

2009-12-10 Thread Sean Devlin
is and I've always liked it. > > Tom > > On Dec 9, 5:43 am, Mark Tomko wrote: > > > I second this - since many of the IDE plugins bundle the clojure-1.0 > > jar, new users trying out Clojure (and IDEs) can't use all the > > features listed in the docs,

Re: Where is the Clojure 1.0 API documentation?

2009-12-09 Thread Mark Tomko
ure itself. Python does this and I've always liked it. > > Tom > > On Dec 9, 5:43 am, Mark Tomko wrote: > > > > > I second this - since many of the IDE plugins bundle the clojure-1.0 > > jar, new users trying out Clojure (and IDEs) can't use all the >

Re: Where is the Clojure 1.0 API documentation?

2009-12-09 Thread Tom Faulhaber
clojure itself. Python does this and I've always liked it. Tom On Dec 9, 5:43 am, Mark Tomko wrote: > I second this - since many of the IDE plugins bundle the clojure-1.0 > jar, new users trying out Clojure (and IDEs) can't use all the > features listed in the docs, and it's

Re: Where is the Clojure 1.0 API documentation?

2009-12-09 Thread Mark Tomko
I second this - since many of the IDE plugins bundle the clojure-1.0 jar, new users trying out Clojure (and IDEs) can't use all the features listed in the docs, and it's hard to tell which is which. Maybe we could at least add a 'added in version' to the new method metadata

Where is the Clojure 1.0 API documentation?

2009-12-09 Thread Jarkko Oranen
I just noticed that the API link on the clojure web site brings up documentation for the master branch of Clojure instead of 1.0.0. I can't find the 1.0.0 docs anywhere either. This is obviously a problem for 1.0.0 users, since the docs refer to features that don't exist. I think it would be good

Re: Confusion on Clojure 1.0, compatible clojure-contrib, git-hub, svn, ...

2009-07-29 Thread Isak Hansen
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 9:59 PM, Laurent PETIT wrote: > > Hi, > > 2009/7/6 Stephen C. Gilardi : >> >> On Jul 6, 2009, at 3:13 PM, Tom Emerson wrote: >> >> Thanks Paul, for the quick response. >> >> On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 12:56 PM, Phil Hagelberg wrote: >> >> That's right. Side note to folks with co

Re: Confusion on Clojure 1.0, compatible clojure-contrib, git-hub, svn, ...

2009-07-14 Thread Michael Wood
2009/7/13 Cosmin Stejerean : > On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Laurent PETIT > wrote: >> >> I think there could be a way to make both parts happy : rather than >> just adding the info that it is an old repo in some README file in the >> root directory of the svn repo, committing also an svn delet

Re: Confusion on Clojure 1.0, compatible clojure-contrib, git-hub, svn, ...

2009-07-13 Thread Cosmin Stejerean
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Laurent PETIT wrote: > > I think there could be a way to make both parts happy : rather than > just adding the info that it is an old repo in some README file in the > root directory of the svn repo, committing also an svn delete command > on all the contents of tru

Re: Confusion on Clojure 1.0, compatible clojure-contrib, git-hub, svn, ...

2009-07-06 Thread Laurent PETIT
Hi, 2009/7/6 Stephen C. Gilardi : > > On Jul 6, 2009, at 3:13 PM, Tom Emerson wrote: > > Thanks Paul, for the quick response. > > On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 12:56 PM, Phil Hagelberg wrote: > > That's right. Side note to folks with commit access: it would be a good > > idea to check in a note to the d

Re: Confusion on Clojure 1.0, compatible clojure-contrib, git-hub, svn, ...

2009-07-06 Thread Tom Emerson
Thanks Stu, Mike, and Stephen for your responses: I appreciate the help. @Stephen, these are all horses not worth kicking any further. Thanks for the git links. @Stu, I'll take that under advisement, but I'm not going to install ruby for that one tool... yet. :) Thanks again guys, -tree O

Re: Confusion on Clojure 1.0, compatible clojure-contrib, git-hub, svn, ...

2009-07-06 Thread Stuart Halloway
I strongly recommend using grb (http://grb.rubyforge.org/) as a wrapper for remote-branch-related stuff. It provides a convenient terminal API, and will tell you the git commands it is using under the hood. Stu > So I guess my unstated question is this: what is the GIT incantation > to get

Re: Confusion on Clojure 1.0, compatible clojure-contrib, git-hub, svn, ...

2009-07-06 Thread Mike Hinchey
After you do the git clone, cd into clojure, then: git checkout remotes/origin/1.0 For clojure-contrib: git checkout remotes/origin/clojure-1.0-compatible -Mike --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: Confusion on Clojure 1.0, compatible clojure-contrib, git-hub, svn, ...

2009-07-06 Thread Stephen C. Gilardi
On Jul 6, 2009, at 3:13 PM, Tom Emerson wrote: Thanks Paul, for the quick response. On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 12:56 PM, Phil Hagelberg wrote: That's right. Side note to folks with commit access: it would be a good idea to check in a note to the deprecated repositories telling people where to

Re: Confusion on Clojure 1.0, compatible clojure-contrib, git-hub, svn, ...

2009-07-06 Thread Tom Emerson
Thanks Paul, for the quick response. On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 12:56 PM, Phil Hagelberg wrote: > That's right. Side note to folks with commit access: it would be a good > idea to check in a note to the deprecated repositories telling people > where to go for the latest versions. Or, better, do away

Re: Confusion on Clojure 1.0, compatible clojure-contrib, git-hub, svn, ...

2009-07-06 Thread Phil Hagelberg
k in a note to the deprecated repositories telling people where to go for the latest versions. > I can download a zip file containing the Clojure 1.0 release, but I > cannot find a similar package for the corresponding clojure-contrib > --- does this not exist? If so, where do I grab it? So

Confusion on Clojure 1.0, compatible clojure-contrib, git-hub, svn, ...

2009-07-06 Thread Tom Emerson
N repository on GoogleCode is no longer being used? I can download a zip file containing the Clojure 1.0 release, but I cannot find a similar package for the corresponding clojure-contrib --- does this not exist? If so, where do I grab it? I see there is a tag in git for Clojure 1.0, but I have yet to wrap

Re: Contrib branch compatible with Clojure 1.0

2009-07-02 Thread Stuart Sierra
ted for inclusion with Clojure itself, as recently happened to c.c.test-is. But a JAR to include with the Clojure 1.0 distribution would be good. Let people find out if anything is missing/broken in the contrib branch, and then we can make one. -SS --~--~-~--~~~---~--~-

Re: Contrib branch compatible with Clojure 1.0

2009-07-02 Thread Chouser
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Stuart Sierra wrote: > > Hi folks, > I have created a branch of clojure-contrib that should be fully > compatible with Clojure 1.0: > http://github.com/richhickey/clojure-contrib/tree/clojure-1.0-compatible > > This includes c.c.test-is with

Contrib branch compatible with Clojure 1.0

2009-07-02 Thread Stuart Sierra
Hi folks, I have created a branch of clojure-contrib that should be fully compatible with Clojure 1.0: http://github.com/richhickey/clojure-contrib/tree/clojure-1.0-compatible This includes c.c.test-is with the older syntax for "are". Maybe this should be updated to use the ne

Re: Clojure 1.0

2009-05-05 Thread liebke
Congratulations to Rich and all the contributors! It has been a joy to program in Clojure, it is the Lisp I've been waiting for. Thank you, David --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To p

Re: Clojure 1.0

2009-05-05 Thread tmountain
I've submitted the announcement to Slashdot. It's in the firehose right now. If anyone has an account, you can go vote for the submission and perhaps we can get it on the front page. http://slashdot.org/firehose.pl - article titled "Clojure 1.0 Released" Travis On May 4, 10

Re: Clojure 1.0

2009-05-05 Thread Neo
Congratulations to Rich and the whole community. It's a fantastic time. Cheers! On May 4, 8:58 pm, Rich Hickey wrote: > After a sustained period of API stability and minimal bugs reports, > I'm happy to announce the release of Clojure 1.0! > > http://clojure.googlecode.c

Re: Clojure 1.0

2009-05-05 Thread Mikio Hokari
aking > the Lisp I've been waiting for all these years. > > Travis > > On May 4, 8:58 am, Rich Hickey wrote: >> After a sustained period of API stability and minimal bugs reports, >> I'm happy to announce the release of Clojure 1.0! >> >> http://cloju

Re: Clojure 1.0

2009-05-04 Thread Santanu
On May 4, 5:58 pm, Rich Hickey wrote: > After a sustained period of API stability and minimal bugs reports, > I'm happy to announce the release of Clojure 1.0! > > http://clojure.googlecode.com/files/clojure_1.0.0.zip Thanks a lot and congrats to you and the Clojure community.

Re: Clojure 1.0

2009-05-04 Thread kkw
> After a sustained period of API stability and minimal bugs reports, > > I'm happy to announce the release of Clojure 1.0! > > >http://clojure.googlecode.com/files/clojure_1.0.0.zip > > > Numbered releases will enable people to consume a stable version of > > Cloju

Re: Clojure 1.0

2009-05-04 Thread tmountain
Congrats! I'm loving Clojure more all the time. Thank you for making the Lisp I've been waiting for all these years. Travis On May 4, 8:58 am, Rich Hickey wrote: > After a sustained period of API stability and minimal bugs reports, > I'm happy to announce the release of

Re: Clojure 1.0

2009-05-04 Thread miner
(dosync (alter congrats conj (System/getProperty "user.name"))) --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this

Re: Clojure 1.0

2009-05-04 Thread Mark H.
Congrats Rich and contributors! You all have made a great tool and a great community as well! mfh --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googleg

Re: Clojure 1.0

2009-05-04 Thread David Nolen
Congrats exciting times! On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 8:58 AM, Rich Hickey wrote: > > After a sustained period of API stability and minimal bugs reports, > I'm happy to announce the release of Clojure 1.0! > > http://clojure.googlecode.com/files/clojure_1.0.0.zip > > Num

Ivy for Clojure 1.0

2009-05-04 Thread Meikel Brandmeyer
Hi, I updated the Ivy repo for Clojure 1.0.0 and Contrib 757. Feel free to use (example in the attached patches). If you use the repo please mirror it locally. Thank you. Sincerely Meikel contrib-ivy2.diff Description: Binary data clojure-ivy2.diff Description: Binary data smime.p7s Descr

Re: Clojure 1.0

2009-05-04 Thread Robert Stehwien
> > After a sustained period of API stability and minimal bugs reports, > I'm happy to announce the release of Clojure 1.0! > > http://clojure.googlecode.com/files/clojure_1.0.0.zip > > Congratulations! I made a promise to myself long ago to really learn a Lisp. I

Re: Clojure 1.0

2009-05-04 Thread Olov Lassus
Congratulations! Keep up the good work, /Olov --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email

Re: Clojure 1.0

2009-05-04 Thread Nicolas Buduroi
wrote: > After a sustained period of API stability and minimal bugs reports, > I'm happy to announce the release of Clojure 1.0! > > http://clojure.googlecode.com/files/clojure_1.0.0.zip > > Numbered releases will enable people to consume a stable version of > Clojure and

Re: Clojure 1.0

2009-05-04 Thread Martin DeMello
On May 4, 5:58 pm, Rich Hickey wrote: > After a sustained period of API stability and minimal bugs reports, > I'm happy to announce the release of Clojure 1.0! > > http://clojure.googlecode.com/files/clojure_1.0.0.zip Congrat

Re: Clojure 1.0

2009-05-04 Thread Jonas Bonér
Big congrats. Fantastic work Rich and all contributors. Thanks for making this happen. /Jonas 2009/5/4 Rich Hickey : > > After a sustained period of API stability and minimal bugs reports, > I'm happy to announce the release of Clojure 1.0! > > http://clojure.googlecode.com

Re: Clojure 1.0

2009-05-04 Thread Rayne
Congratulations Rich! I'm happy to be a part of the Clojure community. On May 4, 7:58 am, Rich Hickey wrote: > After a sustained period of API stability and minimal bugs reports, > I'm happy to announce the release of Clojure 1.0! > > http://clojure.googlecode.com/f

Re: Clojure 1.0

2009-05-04 Thread Rick Moynihan
nguage! R. On May 4, 1:58 pm, Rich Hickey wrote: > After a sustained period of API stability and minimal bugs reports, > I'm happy to announce the release of Clojure 1.0! > > http://clojure.googlecode.com/files/clojure_1.0.0.zip > > Numbered releases will enable people to con

Re: Clojure 1.0

2009-05-04 Thread Stevie Wang
Congrats!!! On 5月4日, 下午8时58分, Rich Hickey wrote: > After a sustained period of API stability and minimal bugs reports, > I'm happy to announce the release of Clojure 1.0! > > http://clojure.googlecode.com/files/clojure_1.0.0.zip > > Numbered releases will enable peo

Re: Clojure 1.0

2009-05-04 Thread Rich Hickey
On May 4, 9:51 am, "mchan...@uiuc.edu" wrote: > This is a very cool! I have one suggestion: maybe we should update the > clojure website and add the announcement of 1.0 release. I know that > Rich has announce the news in the blog. However, most of the people > will just go tohttp://clojure.org

Re: Clojure 1.0

2009-05-04 Thread AlamedaMike
Congratulations, Rich! And thanks for all your hard work. Having a 1.0 release out to help adoption in the workplace environments that we need to get into. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" gr

Re: Clojure 1.0

2009-05-04 Thread AlamedaMike
Congratulations, Rich! And thanks for all your hard work. Having a 1.0 release ought to help adoption in the workplace environments that we need to get into. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" g

Re: Clojure 1.0

2009-05-04 Thread mchan...@uiuc.edu
the announcement on the main website. Any comment? On May 4, 7:58 am, Rich Hickey wrote: > After a sustained period of API stability and minimal bugs reports, > I'm happy to announce the release of Clojure 1.0! > > http://clojure.googlecode.com/files/clojure_1.0.0.zip > >

Re: Clojure 1.0

2009-05-04 Thread Sean Devlin
Thank you and congrats! On May 4, 9:46 am, AlamedaMike wrote: |> Congratulations, Rich! And thanks for all your hard work. Having a 1.0 |> release out to help adoption in the workplace environments that we |> need to get into. Indeed, this is the case where I work. Having a stable version to t

Re: Clojure 1.0

2009-05-04 Thread Baishampayan Ghose
Rich Hickey wrote: > After a sustained period of API stability and minimal bugs reports, > I'm happy to announce the release of Clojure 1.0! > > http://clojure.googlecode.com/files/clojure_1.0.0.zip This is fantastic! Congratulations to Rich and the Clojure commu

Clojure 1.0

2009-05-04 Thread Rich Hickey
After a sustained period of API stability and minimal bugs reports, I'm happy to announce the release of Clojure 1.0! http://clojure.googlecode.com/files/clojure_1.0.0.zip Numbered releases will enable people to consume a stable version of Clojure and move to bugfix-only incremental ver