Enhancing the doc tool so that we have versions for the multiple branches (1.0, 1.1, master, new) is on my agenda.
Maybe there's a way that Rich could add a link to the old 1.0 doc in the meantime. I think that the "added in version" metadata tag is a good idea, at least for clojure itself. Python does this and I've always liked it. Tom On Dec 9, 5:43 am, Mark Tomko <mjt0...@gmail.com> wrote: > I second this - since many of the IDE plugins bundle the clojure-1.0 > jar, new users trying out Clojure (and IDEs) can't use all the > features listed in the docs, and it's hard to tell which is which. > Maybe we could at least add a 'added in version' to the new method > metadata? > > On Dec 9, 4:48 am, Jarkko Oranen <chous...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I just noticed that the API link on the clojure web site brings up > > documentation for the master branch of Clojure instead of 1.0.0. I > > can't find the 1.0.0 docs anywhere either. > > > This is obviously a problem for 1.0.0 users, since the docs refer to > > features that don't exist. > > > I think it would be good to have the API page contain links to 1.0.0 > > docs as well as master and perhaps other branches as well. Also, a > > clear indication (preferably in a bold font or something) of which > > revision the doc was generated for would be useful. > > > -- > > Jarkko -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
