On Jul 2, 2:17 pm, Chouser <chou...@gmail.com> wrote: > Also, is there any reason not to call this contrib-1.0? It seems to me that > it > would be most useful to have major contrib versions simply map to major > clojure > versions: contrib-1.a.x for clojure-1.a.y
The consensus on the dev list seemed to be that "Contrib 1.0" would imply a degree of coherence and stability that many contrib libraries have not yet achieved. I'm happy to leave contrib as-is and let different parts evolve at their own pace. Libraries that experience heavy use and minimal changes can be nominated for inclusion with Clojure itself, as recently happened to c.c.test-is. But a JAR to include with the Clojure 1.0 distribution would be good. Let people find out if anything is missing/broken in the contrib branch, and then we can make one. -SS --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
