2009/7/13 Cosmin Stejerean <cstejer...@gmail.com>: > On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Laurent PETIT <laurent.pe...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> I think there could be a way to make both parts happy : rather than >> just adding the info that it is an old repo in some README file in the >> root directory of the svn repo, committing also an svn delete command >> on all the contents of trunk could help clarify this : by default, >> users checking (or updating !) trunk would have an empty working copy >> as a result (and also just the informative README file). >> But tags would still be there, and also the entire repository history, >> as a svn delete is just deleting files in the commited revision, not >> deleting the history (one could retrieve a working copy by just >> emitting svn up -r N-1 where N would be the "deletion" commit. > > +1 on a comitting a delete of everything and adding a README file saying the > repo has moved. We've had plenty of confusion when switching from SF with > people running old code, and now that there are 2 repos around that are no > longer maintained I suspect the confusion will only increase.
+1 -- Michael Wood <esiot...@gmail.com> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
