ncomp would be faster if it's implemented a la exponentiation by squaring.
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Ben Wolfson wrote:
> If you rearrange the arguments of your proposed three-argument iterate:
>
> (defn iterate
> ...
> ([f n x]
>(if (zero? n)
> x
+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving ema
mails from it, send an
> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, sen
ou are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
--
Ben Wolfson
"Human k
liced into a list,
so if you have just one single expression, it turns into a function call:
user=> (defmacro p [k] (println k))
#'user/p
user=> (p #({:k %}))
(fn* [p1__7143#] ({:k p1__7143#}));; < attempting to invoke a map
with zero args
nil
user=> (p #(do {:k %}))
(fn* [p1
claiming that Rich did something he
had no *right* to do. One can still suggest that the way the project's run
(or the way these specific issues were handled) is unwise or shabby or
otherwise capable of improvement. No one has to take the suggestion, but it
might be better if they did.
--
Be
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 8:29 AM, Herwig Hochleitner
wrote:
>
>
> 2015-06-24 1:25 GMT+02:00 Ben Wolfson :
>
>> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 4:17 PM, Ghadi Shayban
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Tangentially:
>>> (remove even?)
>>> Will be fa
sed to `remove` at the
> outset. In the second example the var dereference happens for every single
> item (though it's very cheap). The second example is equivalent to writing
> (remove
> #'even?)
>
I can't seem to observe a difference between the two cases.
--
s
> (get->> sample-data [:tracks :items count]) ; => 5
>
Here you're passing in a sequence, not a symbol, so the macro expansion can
splice correctly.
In this case, fwiw, you can just do this:
user=> (def pattern [:tracks :items count])
#'user/pattern
user=> (def s
r first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Cloju
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> Fo
ge because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send emai
lojure?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.
gt; For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email
this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
--
--
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optou
Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
--
Ben Wolfson
"Human kind has used its intellig
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Alex Miller wrote:
> Hi Henrik,
>
> There is a long-standing philosophical position in Clojure that it should
> not be possible to write programs that cannot be read by other users.
>
What does that mean?
--
Ben Wolfson
"Human kind has u
received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
&
(it's also zero-indexed, unlike yours, but that isn't a big change)
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 9:17 PM, Ben Wolfson wrote:
> This is a little more concise:
>
> (->> "00101110101110"
>(map-indexed vector)
>(partition-by second)
>
first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> &quo
ojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> ---
; To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
occasion of
> saving, then there's simply not much I can do about it.
>
You could, theoretically, send it along anyway, per the developer's
request, and let him make the determination of whether or not there's
anything useful there.
--
Ben Wolfson
"Human kind has used its
interesting... I hadn't considered it was running the zipmap at
> compile-time so it only runs it once as opposed to running it for each row!
>
> Sean
>
> On Oct 10, 2014, at 1:06 PM, Ben Wolfson wrote:
> > I believe it's because the `mapper` function is just creati
still implicitly contains a list of keys,
> it's still implicitly treating each row as a seq and walking it, so I'm
> wondering what the seq-destructuring and the map literal are doing under
> the hood that's faster.
>
>
--
Ben Wolfson
"Human kind has used its i
e.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, vi
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> Fo
/clojure?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://
se be patient with
> your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
... the other half of the answer being that when you have rest args with
(defn foo [& args] ...), "args" is bound to a seq.
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Ben Wolfson wrote:
> The reason is that in the macroexpansion of "let", map-based destructuring
> has a s
p, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups
eceived this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
&
gt; (defn only-keep-unique-ids [ids]
> (set (map #(get-form-id-without-timestamp %) ids)))
>
>
That won't necessarily get the *first* one; also, it will return a set of
the prefixes, not a set of the ids that have the relevant prefixes.
--
Ben Wolfson
"Human kind has used i
plementations.
Also, the `mdo` syntax macro was abstracted out and can now accept an
arbitrary user-provided function for doing monadic binds, which should mean
that it can be used with other libraries, though I haven't actually tested
this.
--
Ben Wolfson
"Human kind has used its in
use you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
--
Ben Wolfson
"Hu
There are three vowels in "naïve", not two.
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Mark Engelberg wrote:
> Why do you say that?
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Ben Wolfson wrote:
>
>> The naïve implementation does sometimes underestimate the total, though.
For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> emai
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 11:28 AM, Bob Hutchison wrote:
>
> On May 19, 2014, at 1:44 PM, Ben Wolfson wrote:
>
> I wouldn't say that I *often* find myself reaching for monads, or the
> state monad in particular, but I certainly have found them useful on
> occasion (a
ageous that you have to explicitly say that you want to do
IO inside a transaction, given that (in general) you probably shouldn't be
doing it.
--
Ben Wolfson
"Human kind has used its intelligence to vary the flavour of drinks, which
may be sweet, aromatic, fermented or spirit-based. ... F
because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
--
Ben Wolfson
s
is that they "begin with a non-numeric character", it seems pretty
forgivable to assume that the colon is part of the keyword (the fact that
it isn't stored is immaterial; if you know it's a keyword you also know it
starts with a colon) and that it can therefore contain numeric c
archive.org.
>
> Ah, that was good, I feel better now!
>
The woes of academic publishing have nothing to do with the idea that you
can't cite websites; MLA and Chicago style both have provisions for citing
websites and I'm sure less widespread style guides do as well.
-
nsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Clojure" group.
>
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Chris Lappe wrote:
> Wouldn't just calling rest on your collection do what you want?
>
(remove-first #(= % 3) [1 2 3 4 3 5]) should return [1 2 4 3 5].
--
Ben Wolfson
"Human kind has used its intelligence to vary the flavour of drinks, wh
+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving em
roup at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.c
mean that sometimes you would evaluate too
> much tests, but since this would happen in parallel, in general the result
> would return faster. *Am I right in presuming that, or am I overlooking
> some very basic argument against them (I'm pretty good at that) ?*
>
The result wouldn
ke. `silly` expands into a case, which expects bare
symbols.
--
Ben Wolfson
"Human kind has used its intelligence to vary the flavour of drinks, which
may be sweet, aromatic, fermented or spirit-based. ... Family and social
life also offer numerous other occasions to consume drinks for ple
ction).
>
Is this a real property of Clojure's sets or an artifact of their present
implementation? Is it something that anything impleneting IPersistentSet
has to promise to uphold?
--
Ben Wolfson
"Human kind has used its intelligence to vary the flavour of drinks, which
may be sweet,
please be patient with
> your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed t
e of statically typed languages, if I understand it.)
--
Ben Wolfson
"Human kind has used its intelligence to vary the flavour of drinks, which
may be sweet, aromatic, fermented or spirit-based. ... Family and social
life also offer numerous other occasions to consume drinks for pleasur
be from this topic, visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/clojure/0I7u5yn01qU/unsubscribe.
> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
&g
ions, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to clojure+unsu
p.
>>> To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com
>>>
>>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
>>> your first post.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> clojure+u...@g
roup, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe fr
legroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>
\\\ Partner, Problem Solver, Linear Thinker
>> \\\ 541.805.2736 \ @justzeros \ skype:marcuscreo
>>
>>
>> --
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>> To post to this group, send em
.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
--
Ben Wolfson
"Human kind has used its intelligence to vary the flavour of drin
groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For m
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 11:51 AM, wrote:
>
>
>
> (dissoc ['a 'b 'c] 1)
>
> ;=> ['a 'c]
>
So then (get (dissoc some-vector i) i) would be equivalent to (get
some-vector (inc i))?
--
Ben Wolfson
"Human kind has used its intelligence to va
gt; To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Clojure" group.
> To unsub
((comlpement p) x) g)))
>
> That's uglier than the if :)
>
Also less efficient, since it may require evaluating (p x) twice.
If it were me, I'd use something like this:
(defn either
"Return a function that takes one argument, x, and returns (f x) if (p
x) is truthy and (g x
the Google Groups
> "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
--
Ben Wolfson
"Human kind has
ooglegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, sen
ts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> ---
> You received this mess
roup.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group
it :y) [it it-1]
it) nil))
(let* [it (get {:x {:y 3}} :x)] (if it (let* [it (get it :y)] (if it [it
it-1] it)) nil))
The inner let* should be binding it-1.
--
Ben Wolfson
"Human kind has used its intelligence to vary the flavour of drinks, which
may be sweet, aromatic, fermented or spirit-
used, for example, here:
https://github.com/bwo/monads/blob/master/src/monads/util.clj#L28-L43 and
here:
https://github.com/ReadyForZero/babbage/blob/1.1/src/babbage/graph.clj#L28-L79
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 9:23 AM, Ben Wolfson wrote:
> I've got something that helps with this stuff:
the Google Groups
> "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
--
Ben Wolfson
"Human kind has u
f (fn [] x)
>f-sym (gensym)]
> (intern *ns* gensym (weak-ref f))
> (with-meta (eval `(fn [] (do-stuff-with @~f))) {::strong-ref f}))
>
> So that way f will be freed up when the resulting fn is gced.
>
> On 28 August 2013 17:59, Ben Wolfson wrote:
> > On Wed, A
a is the right move,
though it's kidn of dissatisfying.
--
Ben Wolfson
"Human kind has used its intelligence to vary the flavour of drinks, which
may be sweet, aromatic, fermented or spirit-based. ... Family and social
life also offer numerous other occasions to consume drinks for pleasure.&quo
at runtime.
--
Ben Wolfson
"Human kind has used its intelligence to vary the flavour of drinks, which
may be sweet, aromatic, fermented or spirit-based. ... Family and social
life also offer numerous other occasions to consume drinks for pleasure."
[Larousse, "Drink" entry]
--
iculty, but this appears not to be the case.
--
Ben Wolfson
"Human kind has used its intelligence to vary the flavour of drinks, which
may be sweet, aromatic, fermented or spirit-based. ... Family and social
life also offer numerous other occasions to consume drinks for pleasure."
-first macro correctly handles this! It's not just `(when-let
[~x (first ~xs)] ~@body). when-first nicely hides away what would otherwise
be "much more ugly".
--
Ben Wolfson
"Human kind has used its intelligence to vary the flavour of drinks, which
may be sweet, aromatic, ferment
emails from it, send an
> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
--
Ben Wolfson
"Human kind has used its intelligence to vary the flavour of drinks, which
may be sweet, aromatic, fermented or spirit-based.
ot; group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit t
A sentinel value also prevents channels from being able to send/receive
arbitrary values, without further wrapping.
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 17, 2013, at 5:48 PM, Mikera wrote:
> My overall sense is that the convenience of using if-let directly in a few
> use cases doesn't justify making ch
oups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For mor
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Brandon Bloom wrote:
> > have every other value come wrapped in a Just or Some-like constructor
>
> That's what I meant by "a pair of quote/unquote operators"
>
ah, gotcha
--
Ben Wolfson
"Human kind has used its intelli
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Brandon Bloom wrote:
> I ran into the other half of this problem: If you expect nils to signify
> closed channels, then you can't leverage the logically false nature of nil
> without excluding explicit boolean false values. Given the pleasant syntax
> of if-let /
Is this a bug?
user> (with-redefs [list +] (list 1 2)) ;; expected: 3
3 ;; huzzah
user> (with-redefs [+ list] (+ 1 2)) ;; expected: (1 2)
3 ;; blast!
--
Ben Wolfson
"Human kind has used its intelligence to vary the flavour of drinks, which
may be sweet, aromatic, fermented or s
at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For mor
ough the wrongful holder would call it theft,
isn't clearly problematic. You may think that Stallman is wrong that code
can be wrongly held, but that's independent of the analogies he draws.
--
Ben Wolfson
"Human kind has used its intelligence to vary the flavour of drinks, which
may
cause you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 9:31 PM, Ben Wolfson wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 9:27 PM, Yoshinori Kohyama wrote:
>
>> Thank you, Ben.
>>
>> If I think the map as a tree, then as a functor, what I do is 'fmap' (in
>> Haskell or some languages),
>> ,as
(fmap (partial fmap inc) {:a {:x 1} :b {:y 2}}) ---> {:a {:x 2} :b {:y 3}}
if you want to use that fmap (or, I'd think, the fmaps provided by either
morph or fluokitten) with uneven depths, you'd have to wrap them in a
defrecord or deftype, I'd expect.
--
Ben Wolfson
"
Google
>>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an email to clojure+u...@**googlegroups.com.
>>>>
>>>> For more options, visit
>>>> https://groups.g
abel "pizza" "it")}}))
{:annotation #{(label "pizza" "it")}}
macroparser.parsers>
i.e., match a map with one value whose key is :annotation and whose value
is a set containing a seq of 'label, anything, and "it".
--
Ben Wolfson
"Hu
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Sean Corfield wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Ben Wolfson wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Stefan Kamphausen
> > wrote:
> >> It complects require and refer ;-)
> > How so?
>
> Because use = require + r
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Stefan Kamphausen wrote:
>
> It complects require and refer ;-)
>
How so?
--
Ben Wolfson
"Human kind has used its intelligence to vary the flavour of drinks, which
may be sweet, aromatic, fermented or spirit-based. ... Family and social
life also
sefully (I think) grouped together.
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 7:02 PM, Zach Tellman wrote:
> It looks like the macroexpansion code in conditions.free is fairly
> generic. What would you say to putting it into its own library?
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 6:54 PM, Ben Wolfson wrote:
For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/**group/clojure?hl=en<http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en>
>>> ---
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>>
cribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
>
--
Ben Wolfson
"Human kind has used its intelligence to vary the flavour of drinks, which
l=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://g
c x))
#'user/od?
user=> (c/run-cont (evn? 500))
true
But the result is about 2x slower than what the clojure-tco macro produces
(around 600ms vs around 300ms, for me).
--
Ben Wolfson
"Human kind has used its intelligence to vary the flavour of drinks, which
may be sweet, ar
some-condition
(recur ...)
(foo ...
where you can't use recur for the call to foo, even though it's in tail
position, because the recur target is the loop expression.
--
Ben Wolfson
"Human kind has used its intelligence to vary the flavour of drinks, which
gt; You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, s
1 - 100 of 227 matches
Mail list logo
