[Clamav-users] Question about daily.inc and daily.cvd

2007-07-13 Thread Roberto Ullfig
alled from same directory, etc Are they perhaps contacting different db servers? -- Roberto Ullfig - [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

Re: [Clamav-users] Anything major going on with the clamav databases?

2007-08-10 Thread Roberto Ullfig
On 2007-08-10 12:42, Roberto Ullfig wrote: > The number of virus we are detecting went down drastically at around > 3:30 pm yesterday. Anything going on? > > > > Actually, what we see is that nearly all viruses of the form: Email.Phishing.RB-12... stopped being detected

Re: [Clamav-users] Anything major going on with the

2007-08-10 Thread Roberto Ullfig
On 2007-08-10 17:00, Roberto Ullfig wrote: > On 2007-08-10 12:42, Roberto Ullfig wrote: > > The number of virus we are detecting went down drastically at around > > 3:30 pm yesterday. Anything going on? > > > > > > > > > > Actually, what

[Clamav-users] Anything major going on with the clamav databases?

2007-08-10 Thread Roberto Ullfig
The number of virus we are detecting went down drastically at around 3:30 pm yesterday. Anything going on? -- Roberto Ullfig - [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net

Re: [Clamav-users] Anything major going on with the

2007-08-10 Thread Roberto Ullfig
On 2007-08-10 18:51, Roberto Ullfig wrote: > On 2007-08-10 17:00, Roberto Ullfig wrote: > > On 2007-08-10 12:42, Roberto Ullfig wrote: > > > The number of virus we are detecting went down drastically at around > > > 3:30 pm yesterday. Anything going on? > > >

[Clamav-users] Phishing Scanning

2007-08-13 Thread Roberto Ullfig
Sven Strickroth wrote: > Am 10.08.2007 19:00 schrieb Roberto Ullfig: > >> On 2007-08-10 12:42, Roberto Ullfig wrote: >> Actually, what we see is that nearly all viruses of the form: >> >> Email.Phishing.RB-12... >> >> stopped being detected on Au

[Clamav-users] clamd PDF Scanning Problem

2007-08-20 Thread Roberto Ullfig
I had to disable PDF scanning on our servers. We were receiving 9 MB PDF files and clamd started consuming 100% CPU and not completing the scan. Anyone else have issues with PDF scanning? -- Roberto Ullfig - [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Help us build a

Re: [Clamav-users] clamd PDF Scanning Problem

2007-08-20 Thread Roberto Ullfig
Dennis Peterson wrote: > Roberto Ullfig wrote: > >> I had to disable PDF scanning on our servers. We were receiving 9 MB PDF >> files and clamd started consuming 100% CPU and not completing the scan. >> Anyone else have issues with PDF scanning? >> >&g

[Clamav-users] Major Problem with Clamd Startup

2007-09-19 Thread Roberto Ullfig
We restart sendmail/clamd every morning. This morning this restart failed on several servers. The startup hung when clamd was trying to startup. I deleted everything in /var/lib/clamav (database files) and everything started up just fine. -- Roberto Ullfig - [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [Clamav-users] Major Problem with Clamd Startup

2007-09-19 Thread Roberto Ullfig
Rob MacGregor wrote: > On 9/19/07, Roberto Ullfig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> We restart sendmail/clamd every morning. This morning this restart >> failed on several servers. The startup hung when clamd was trying to >> startup. I deleted everything in /var/l

Re: [Clamav-users] Major Problem with Clamd Startup

2007-09-19 Thread Roberto Ullfig
Roberto Ullfig wrote: > Rob MacGregor wrote: > >> On 9/19/07, Roberto Ullfig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >>> We restart sendmail/clamd every morning. This morning this restart >>> failed on several servers. The startup hung when clamd

Re: [Clamav-users] clamd stuck at 100% cpu usage

2007-10-01 Thread Roberto Ullfig
00% when PDF scanning (new feature introduced recently) large files. We've disabled PDF scanning for now. We will need to put in our own check to prevent PDF scanning of files over a certain size. -- Roberto Ullfig - [EMAIL PROTECTED] _

Re: [Clamav-users] Check up database integrity and restart daemon Help?

2007-10-25 Thread Roberto Ullfig
ompressed data--format violated clamd would fail to start because of the bad data. Quick fix is to delete all files in /var/lib/clamav and restart clamd and reload all databases, etc... If you're using scamp.sh to download sanesecurity sigs, modify it to test for the return code of gunzip. -- Roberto Ullfig - [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV-0.92 very high CPU usage

2008-01-11 Thread Roberto Ullfig
SIGNATURE- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFHh3gWkNLDmnu1kSkRAvImAJ9d+4QxiQkBp2MebMN18JLfJCSzlwCfWN3v > JuRHZcyn4MsxgpQmhVoOwgs= > =4o5C > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > > I have the same

Re: [Clamav-users] Sanesecurity mirror hosed

2008-01-11 Thread Roberto Ullfig
the author of the one you are using and inform him of the problem. > > > I installed the latest script but it looks like behavior may have changed. When I ran the script, the sigs were downloaded fine but they weren't detected by clamav un

[Clamav-users] Clamd returned error: Files number limit exceeded

2008-02-07 Thread Roberto Ullfig
We've recently been getting these messages in mimedefang: Clamd returned error: Files number limit exceeded What would the problem be? Thanks! -- Roberto Ullfig - [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit

Re: [Clamav-users] Version 0.92.1 - can no longer install to non-standard directory

2008-02-12 Thread Roberto Ullfig
Roberto Ullfig wrote: > Török Edwin wrote: > >> Roberto Ullfig wrote: >> >> >>> This won't work for us. This creates a usr hierarchy starting under DESTDIR. >>> >>> The installation needs to go into directories like this: >>&

Re: [Clamav-users] Version 0.92.1 - can no longer install to non-standard directory

2008-02-12 Thread Roberto Ullfig
Török Edwin wrote: > Roberto Ullfig wrote: > >> This won't work for us. This creates a usr hierarchy starting under DESTDIR. >> >> The installation needs to go into directories like this: >> >> /mnt/aaa/bbb/local/ccc/ddd/bin >> /mnt/aaa/bbb/local/

[Clamav-users] Simultaneous Installations?

2008-02-12 Thread Roberto Ullfig
r one installation to complete before starting the next one. -- Roberto Ullfig - [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

[Clamav-users] Version 0.92.1 - can no longer install to non-standard directory

2008-02-12 Thread Roberto Ullfig
to a directory not ending in /usr/local/lib Is there a way to get around this restriction? -- Roberto Ullfig - [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

Re: [Clamav-users] Version 0.92.1 - can no longer install to non-standard directory

2008-02-12 Thread Roberto Ullfig
Török Edwin wrote: > Roberto Ullfig wrote: > >> We use a binary repository in blah/local/blah. In the past I would set >> prefix and install to this location. This is no longer possible with >> 0.92.1 (maybe 0.92 also). >> >> export prefi

[Clamav-users] allow clamd to start without any sig files - feature request

2008-02-13 Thread Roberto Ullfig
in such a situation - though of course it would do nothing. This becomes relevant when the server you're working on is not connected to the network (can't access the sig files), with newly built servers, servers that are rebooted, etc... -- Roberto Ullfi

Re: [Clamav-users] US-CERT alert regarding ClamAV

2008-04-15 Thread Roberto Ullfig
t; very soon, and all users are advised to update to this release with > immediate effect. > 0.93RC1 does not include the fix. > > Regards, > By disabling the module do you mean to say that 0.92.1 is not vulnerable? Why does CERT say otherwise? -

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-0.93 error

2008-04-15 Thread Roberto Ullfig
27; > >> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status >> make[2]: *** [freshclam] Error 1 >> make[2]: Leaving directory `/root/clamav-0.93/freshclam' >> make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 >> make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/clamav-0.93' >> make: ***

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-0.93 error

2008-04-15 Thread Roberto Ullfig
Roberto Ullfig wrote: > Joey McKnight wrote: > >> here is what nm -D /usr/lib/libz.so|grep gz displayed: >> >> 00d674c0 T gzclearerr >> 00d67320 T gzclose >> 00d66380 T gzdopen >> 00d67240 T gzeof >> 00d67390 T gzerror >> 00d66ec0 T gzflush

Re: [Clamav-users] US-CERT alert regarding ClamAV

2008-04-15 Thread Roberto Ullfig
John Rudd wrote: > Nigel Horne wrote: > >> Roberto Ullfig wrote: >> >>> Nigel Horne wrote: >>> >>>> A vulnerability was identified by Secunia in 0.92.1 relating to the >>>> PE module. >>>> We immediate

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-0.93 error

2008-04-15 Thread Roberto Ullfig
x 1 root root13 Apr 15 08:38 /usr/local/lib/libz.so.1 -> libz.so.1.2.3 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 75778 Apr 15 08:22 /usr/local/lib/libz.so.1.2.3 -- Roberto Ullfig - [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-0.93 error

2008-04-16 Thread Roberto Ullfig
on of /usr/local/lib/libz.a >> and got the same error. In /usr/lib we have the old rhel 4 version (I >> don't think that matters for this issue). I added the shared version of >> v1.2.3 (run configure -s if you have zlib source) to /usr/local/lib and >> all

[Clamav-users] PhishingScanURLs

2008-07-08 Thread Roberto Ullfig
I've been reviewing our clamav configuration and noticed that we have: PhishingScanURLs no while the default in 0.93.1 is yes What exactly does this test do? How many of you have it turned on and off? -- Roberto Ullfig - [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___

[Clamav-users] bzip2 1.0.5 and clamav 0.94

2008-09-02 Thread Roberto Ullfig
o not report stability problems to the ClamAV developers! [EMAIL PROTECTED] lib]# /usr/local/bin/bzip2 --help bzip2, a block-sorting file compressor. Version 1.0.5, 10-Dec-2007. -- Roberto Ullfig - [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Help us build a comprehensive C

Re: [Clamav-users] bzip2 1.0.5 and clamav 0.94

2008-09-02 Thread Roberto Ullfig
Török Edwin wrote: > On 2008-09-02 22:49, Roberto Ullfig wrote: > >> Running redhat and have installed bzip2 1.0.5 in /usr/local/. How can I >> tell clamav's Configure to look in /usr/local/ just for bzip2? >> > > Try this: > ./configure -

Re: [Clamav-users] bzip2 1.0.5 and clamav 0.94

2008-09-03 Thread Roberto Ullfig
L/usr/local/lib -lbz2 # Also, there is no problem when linking with the redhat libs in /usr/lib: # gcc -o conftest -g -O2 -lz -lbz2 test.c # -- Roberto Ullfig - [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://www.clamav.net/support/ml

Re: [Clamav-users] bzip2 1.0.5 and clamav 0.94

2008-09-04 Thread Roberto Ullfig
Török Edwin wrote: > Hi, > > There is a patch for the bzip2 problem here: > https://wwws.clamav.net/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=801 > > Please let me know if it works. > > Best regards, > --Edwin > ___ > Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit ht

Re: [Clamav-users] bzip2 1.0.5 for CentOS

2008-09-05 Thread Roberto Ullfig
https://www.cert.fi/haavoittuvuudet/joint-advisory-archive-formats.html redhat didn't patch it. Their latest version appears to be from 2005 - per the date on the file. -- Roberto Ullfig - [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://www.clamav.net/support/ml

Re: [Clamav-users] bzip2 1.0.5 for CentOS

2008-09-05 Thread Roberto Ullfig
ted, I guess, resulting in a fixed > bzip2 for the RHEL series (or is this wishful thinking?). > > > Rhetorical question: Why does it have to be a _security_ bug in order for redhat to fix it? -- Roberto Ullfig - [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://www.clamav.net/support/ml

Re: [Clamav-users] How important are file extensions?

2008-09-22 Thread Roberto Ullfig
ment suffixes to .txt but this causes some problems with some applications. We'd like to rename the attachments with another suffix, one that will never be used for an application (present or future). Does anyone know if a standard suffix has been created for just this purpose? -- Roberto