Hi Steven,
Imagine finding help (and the correct answer by the way) right here on
campus! You seem to be right on the mark. If I ripmime one of my
quarantined files and then clamscan the results, it finds the virus
everytime.
Thanks, Phil
On Friday, May 7, 2004, at 02:05 PM, Steven Dean wrote
Thanks for the reply, but
clamscan --mbox quarantine (where quarantine is the directory where
RAV has stored the infected messages
produces the same output as
clamscan quarantine
Am I still being stupid about something?
Thanks, Phil
On Friday, May 7, 2004, at 03:24 PM, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
If you don't like the software, and are unhappy about how much you paid
for it, contact the Clamav team and ask for a job.
Just my 2 cents.
Phil
On Jun 20, 2004, at 10:25 PM, Dan Egli wrote:
Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
Dan Egli wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# clamdscan $PWD
/root: Can't access the fi
On Thursday, August 12, 2004, at 07:41 AM, Damjan wrote:
Although, he does bring up a good point about the ScanMail option
still not being officially supported. While I haven't had any
problems with the feature on my work's server, it certainly does
raise
problems with some network admins.
ScanMa
What do folks think is an appropriate interval for a cron job to run
freshclam? Is once an hour reasonable?
Thanks,
Phil
---
SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media
100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic D
I am running clam in series with RAV on CommuniGate Pro via cgpav. The
messages go through clam first and if clam says OK then they go through
RAV. Today RAV caught 4 messages that clam thought were OK. The
following lines are from the RAV log. Should I provide the original
messages to the clam
On Aug 31, 2004, at 8:02 PM, Niek wrote:
On 9/1/2004 1:52 AM +0200, Philip Ershler wrote:
I am running clam in series with RAV on CommuniGate Pro via cgpav.
The messages go through clam first and if clam says OK then they go
through RAV. Today RAV caught 4 messages that clam thought were OK
What kind of hardware/software are you running on?
On Sep 10, 2004, at 7:33 AM, Stelian wrote:
Please help me, i have a very urgent problem.
I must provide a virus free mail service for my employer, and I must
do it fast or my job is on the line :)
We curently have about 6 POP3 acounts stored on ou
Hi,
I'm running clamav 0.75-3. I just happened to notice when I started
clamd I got some odd messages. Are these anything to worry about? Or
are these Not supported signature types for the .80 release of clamav?
LibClamAV debug: Loading /var/tmp/clamav-7762060f263cf476/daily.db
LibClamAV debug:
Hi,
I have just installed MPP with built in clamav for use with
CommuniGate Pro on an OS X 10.3.5 system. I picked up the most recent
version of MPP. Does this version of MPP utilize clamav .80? I was
running the standalone clamav with cgpav. I assume I should replace my
cron entry that I used
I'm sorry, I just realized that I sent my last message to the wrong
mailing list.
Sorry, Phil
___
http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
I am running the .80 release. Tonight I ran the current set of tests
from www.testvirus.org.
Tests 4,5,7,8,17, and 19 got through. Any idea what's going on. The
last time I ran this suite of
tests on the .75 release, I seem to recall it did much better.
Thanks for any thoughts,
Phil
___
On Nov 24, 2004, at 9:29 PM, Tristan Griffiths wrote:
Philip Ershler wrote:
I am running the .80 release. Tonight I ran the current set of tests
from www.testvirus.org.
Tests 4,5,7,8,17, and 19 got through. Any idea what's going on. The
last time I ran this suite of
tests on the .75 relea
on 12/17/04 1:09 PM, Carnegie, Martin at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Pardon, I didnt mean to imply that clamav doesnt provide the name of
> the
>> virus as well. The point i was trying to make was that clamav itself
>> doesnt know or care about what is actually done after the virus is
>> dete
on 12/17/04 1:26 PM, Dennis Peterson at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> on 12/17/04 1:09 PM, Carnegie, Martin at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> Does your e-mail system have the means of using RTBL (Real Time Black List)
>> servers? If so you might want to try that. Our spam load decreased
>> rema
on 12/17/04 2:31 PM, Carnegie, Martin at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>>>
>>> on 12/17/04 1:09 PM, Carnegie, Martin at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>
>>> Does your e-mail system have the means of using RTBL (Real Time Black
> List)
>>> servers? If so you might want to try that. Our spam load decr
Hi,
Will ClamAV be able to catch executable scripts hiding as e-mail
attachments any time soon?
Thanks, Phil
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
On Sep 8, 2006, at 11:34 AM, Dennis Peterson wrote:
On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 10:05:48AM -0700, Dennis Peterson wrote:
Hopefully the list is also properly escaped and or quoted. xargs
is pretty
unhappy with filenames that have special characters in them, or
spaces. This is
true no matter h
18 matches
Mail list logo
