[Clamav-users] --mbox option

Hi all, I use clamscan to check my incoming mail. This is what I have used to check it (using Procmail): /sw/bin/clamscan --mbox --disable-summary --infected --stdout - (Taken from ) This worked until ClamAV 0.88

Re: [Clamav-users] Local socket unsafe

CPTeam Hostmaster wrote: I get this in maillog whenever I start clamav-milter: -- Mar 8 00:45:01 ns1 sendmail[7399]: l27Mj1nM007399: Milter (clmilter): local socket name /var/run/clamav/clmilter.sock unsafe Mar 8 00:45:01 ns1 sendmail[7399]: l27Mj1nM007399: Milter (clmilter): to error state --

[Clamav-users] no virus scanning after manual ClamAV update

Hi! I installed Fedora Core 4 including amavisd-new 2.4.2 and ClamAV 0.88.7. Everything worked fine, mails sent via postfix were checked by ClamAV. Since the ClamAV version is outdated, I updated to a newer version 0.90.1 (rpms from http://crash.fce.vutbr.cz/crash-hat/4/clamav/) and now I have the

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.90.1 - clamd died on Solaris 9

On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 18:15:54 -0800 Dennis Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alex Moore wrote: > > Has anyone seen 0.90.1's clamd die? I am running Solaris 9 SPARC. > > The daemon had been running for several days. The mail server only > > handles around 500 messages/day. So far, I have no c

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.90.1 - clamd died on Solaris 9

Alex Moore wrote: Has anyone seen 0.90.1's clamd die? I am running Solaris 9 SPARC. The daemon had been running for several days. We have had to remove the experimental code from clamav 0.90.1 on our main mail server, Solaris 10 SPARC. The daemon just disappeared after about eight hours. Si

Re: [Clamav-users] --mbox option

- Original Message - From: "Claus Atzenbeck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "ClamAV Users" Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 3:33 AM Subject: [Clamav-users] --mbox option Hi all, I use clamscan to check my incoming mail. This is what I have used to check it (using Procmail): /sw/bin/clam

Re: [Clamav-users] --mbox option

On Thu, 8 Mar 2007, John Fleming wrote: > > I use clamscan to check my incoming mail. This is what I have used to > > check it (using Procmail): > > > >/sw/bin/clamscan --mbox --disable-summary --infected --stdout - > > > > SEE > http://lists.jameslick.com/pipermail/clamassassin-announce/2007-

Re: [Clamav-users] Zip module failure ERROR

On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 20:01 +0200, Török Edvin wrote: > On 3/7/07, Don Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm running 0.90.1 and started to get a bunch of these messages when > > scanning PDF's (usually inside a zip file). > > > > I have unzipped the .zip files containing the PDF's, and tried sca

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.90.1 - clamd died on Solaris 9

--On Thursday, March 08, 2007 11:31:28 AM + Jonathan Armitage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Alex Moore wrote: Has anyone seen 0.90.1's clamd die? I am running Solaris 9 SPARC. The daemon had been running for several days. We have had to remove the experimental code from clamav 0.90.1 on o

Re: [Clamav-users] Zip module failure ERROR

On 3/8/07, Daniel J McDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 20:01 +0200, Török Edvin wrote: > On 3/7/07, Don Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm running 0.90.1 and started to get a bunch of these messages when > > scanning PDF's (usually inside a zip file). > > > > I have

Re: [Clamav-users] Zip module failure ERROR

* Don Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I would, but I'm getting the following error in Bugzilla: > > You are not authorized to access bug #396. I wonder why that is -- it's a stupid idea IMHO. -- Ralf Hildebrandt (i.A. des IT-Zentrums) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Charite - Universitätsmedizin Berlin

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.90.1 - clamd died on Solaris 9

On Thu, 8 Mar 2007, Didi Rieder wrote: ; Lucky you, maybe to low message volume We have a several Solaris 10 servers running 0.90.1, each processing over 250K messages a day and have seen absolutely no problems. Experimental code isn't enabled. I wonder what the difference is with your setup?

Re: [Clamav-users] Zip module failure ERROR

On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 16:54 +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > * Don Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > I would, but I'm getting the following error in Bugzilla: > > > > You are not authorized to access bug #396. > > I wonder why that is -- it's a stupid idea IMHO. > I believe all bugs are coded a

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.90.1 - clamd died on Solaris 9

Andy Fiddaman wrote: On Thu, 8 Mar 2007, Didi Rieder wrote: ; Lucky you, maybe to low message volume We have a several Solaris 10 servers running 0.90.1, each processing over 250K messages a day and have seen absolutely no problems. Experimental code isn't enabled. I wonder what the differen

Re: [Clamav-users] no virus scanning after manual ClamAV update

On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 10:47 +0100, "Sebastian Gäde" wrote: > Hi! > > I installed Fedora Core 4 including amavisd-new 2.4.2 and ClamAV > 0.88.7. Everything worked fine, mails sent via postfix were checked by > ClamAV. > Since the ClamAV version is outdated, I updated to a newer version > 0.90.1 (rp

[Clamav-users] Freshclam not updating

Hi there -- I recently upgraded clamav to version 0.90.1. The method that I used was downloading the Fedora Core 5 binaries into a single directory, and running the rpm -Uvh *.rpm command. The installation completed successfully. I checked the log files earlier today and I came across the followin

Re: [Clamav-users] Freshclam not updating

On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 10:41 -0500, Kaplan, Andrew H. wrote: > Hi there -- > Starting freshclam: ERROR: Parse error at line 44: Option > AllowSupplementaryGroups requires boolean argument. > > > What change(s) do I need to make to what file(s) in order to correct this > problem, and ensure that

Re: [Clamav-users] Freshclam not updating

Kaplan, Andrew H. wrote: Hi there -- I recently upgraded clamav to version 0.90.1. The method that I used was downloading the Fedora Core 5 binaries into a single directory, and running the rpm -Uvh *.rpm command. The installation completed successfully. I checked the log files earlier today and

Re: [Clamav-users] Aborting clamdscan with ctrl-c

On 8 Mar 2007, at 01:29am, Tomasz Kojm wrote: On Thu, 8 Mar 2007 01:18:19 + Mark Allan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: When I cancel clamdscan by using ctrl-c or killall clamdscan the clamdscan process dies but clamd continues to scan the file it's currently on. clamd will automatically det

Re: [Clamav-users] Aborting clamdscan with ctrl-c

On Thu, 8 Mar 2007 16:46:04 + Mark Allan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 8 Mar 2007, at 01:29am, Tomasz Kojm wrote: > > > On Thu, 8 Mar 2007 01:18:19 + > > Mark Allan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> When I cancel clamdscan by using ctrl-c or killall clamdscan the > >> clamdscan pr

RE: [Clamav-users] Local socket unsafe

> > -- > > Mar 8 00:45:01 ns1 sendmail[7399]: l27Mj1nM007399: Milter > (clmilter): local > > socket name /var/run/clamav/clmilter.sock unsafe > > Mar 8 00:45:01 ns1 sendmail[7399]: l27Mj1nM007399: Milter > (clmilter): to > > error state > > -- > > > > Googling brought advices to chmod /var/run

[Clamav-users] scriptedupdates ignored if daily.inc exists

I upgraded my test-system to 0.90.1 without realising that freshclams default behaviour had changed to using the diff-method rather than downloading the full cvd file. WHen I found out a bit later, I updated freshclam.conf, but this seemed to have no effect. This turned out to be because I'd left

Re: [Clamav-users] Aborting clamdscan with ctrl-c

On 8 Mar 2007, at 16:57pm, Tomasz Kojm wrote: On Thu, 8 Mar 2007 16:46:04 + Mark Allan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 8 Mar 2007, at 01:29am, Tomasz Kojm wrote: On Thu, 8 Mar 2007 01:18:19 + Mark Allan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: When I cancel clamdscan by using ctrl-c or killall clam

Re: [Clamav-users] Freshclam not updating

On 3/8/07 8:43 AM, "Daniel J McDonald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You will probably need to read through the whole freshclam.conf and > clamd.conf file to make those changes. I learned a couple of emacs commands I hadn't found in 12 years of using emacs, in the course of comparing our running c

RE: [Clamav-users] Freshclam not updating

Hi there -- I commented out the AllowSupplementaryGroups line in /etc/freshclam.conf and manually ran the freshclam binary. The update appeared to succeed. Thanks for the help. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John W. Baxter Sent: Thursday, M

Re: [Clamav-users] Upgrade to .90?

Török Edvin wrote: On 3/7/07, Abdul Rehman Gani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 06 Mar 2007, at 4:55 PM, Scott Oertel wrote: > > Just installed the 0.90_3 port, same problem, except it took a > little bit less time for the IO to get real high, for some reason > clam just can't keep up. I guess I

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.90.1 - clamd died on Solaris 9

On Thu, 8 Mar 2007 16:02:40 + (GMT) Andy Fiddaman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, 8 Mar 2007, Didi Rieder wrote: > ; Lucky you, maybe to low message volume > > We have a several Solaris 10 servers running 0.90.1, each processing > over 250K messages a day and have seen absolutely

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.90.1 - clamd died on Solaris 9

On Thu, 8 Mar 2007, Alex Moore wrote: ; On Thu, 8 Mar 2007 16:02:40 + (GMT) ; Andy Fiddaman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ; ; > ; > On Thu, 8 Mar 2007, Didi Rieder wrote: ; > ; Lucky you, maybe to low message volume ; > ; > We have a several Solaris 10 servers running 0.90.1, each processing

Re: [Clamav-users] Debian 0.90.1-0vol

On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 10:41:42PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I see a new lib - libclamav2, and the new version of clamav is available > on volatile now. What precautions or config updates should I do before > updating this on a running mail server. I have just upgraded several machines fro

[Clamav-users] daily.cvd and daily.info

I upgraded to latest Webmin after I got latest clamav, and now I get this when I click on the clamav module: WARNING: Please fill in the location of the secondary signatures database (should be daily.cvd (version < 0.90) or daily.info (version >= 0.90)) in the module's configuration. I don't

Re: [Clamav-users] daily.cvd and daily.info

At 08:35 PM 3/8/2007, John Fleming wrote: I upgraded to latest Webmin after I got latest clamav, and now I get this when I click on the clamav module: WARNING: Please fill in the location of the secondary signatures database (should be daily.cvd (version < 0.90) or daily.info (version >= 0.90