On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 08:53:04 +0100 in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] "Leif Neland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Talking about annoyances; I hate messages signed by pgp because my
> reader shows the messages as blank with two attachments: the text and
> the key.
H, Outlook Express, I wonder why that could
On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 08:04:24 +0200 in [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cami
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What upsets me, is when, on mailing lists everywhere, a few people
> > turn 'top post' instances into flame wars. Is it really that hard to
> > ignore it? Do people really need to be flamed for something so
Brian Morrison wrote:
On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 08:04:24 +0200 in 43A6
Hi guys,
why just u let the topic go. It's enough discussion on this. Any post on
this topic (including this) should not be allowed any more and rejected
straight away.
Regards
Vaijanath N. Rao
Life is as always as it was ex
some of us join this list to read/learn about clamav.
could you please take this topic elsewhere? 20 messages in *everyone's* inbox
really are enough ...
thanks.
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
On 12/17/05, GiM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> des in message '[Clamav-users] XML and large file scan performance' wrote:
> > In investigating heavy load during clamd scanning on an email server,
> > I noticed that scanning XML files appears to take longer than similar
> > sized binary files. I'm al
On 12/18/05, Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can't speak for others on this list, but I get hundreds or thousands
> of emails a day to wade through, and frankly top-posting to mailing
> lists and silly banners just makes me hit the delete key before even
> reading the email. Sorry if t
Hi list,
Since November, I noticed that clamav 87.1 does not recognize the
following virus.
www.i2.com.br/~hamilton/reg_pass.zip
So I posted it in http://cgi.clamav.net/sendvirus.cgi, but I got no answer
NOD32 detects it as Win32/Sober.Y worm, I'd like to know if it is an
isolated c
Hamilton Vera said:
> Hi list,
>
> Since November, I noticed that clamav 87.1 does not recognize the
> following virus.
>
> www.i2.com.br/~hamilton/reg_pass.zip
>
> So I posted it in http://cgi.clamav.net/sendvirus.cgi, but I got no answer
>
> NOD32 detects it as Win32/Sober.Y worm, I'd like
On Mon, 19 Dec 2005, Hamilton Vera wrote:
; Since November, I noticed that clamav 87.1 does not recognize the following
; virus.
;
; www.i2.com.br/~hamilton/reg_pass.zip
;
; So I posted it in http://cgi.clamav.net/sendvirus.cgi, but I got no answer
;
; NOD32 detects it as Win32/Sober.Y worm,
Hi Denis, thanks for answering.
What version are you using? I am using and updated 87.1, and I think
that this version is not working.
clamd -V
ClamAV 0.87.1
Received signal: wake up
ClamAV update process started at Mon Dec 19 13:51:22 2005
main.cvd is up to date (version: 34, sigs: 39625, f-l
Hi kids.
Is the spam going to last long?
Please keep your OT confined to your own blogs/MLs.
Stop abusing everyone's patience.
-aCaB
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
> What version are you using? I am using and updated 87.1, and I think
> that this version is not working.
my clamscan (87.1/1213) definitely finds it here (Worm.Sober.U).
--
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
Hamilton Vera said:
> Hi Denis, thanks for answering.
>
> What version are you using? I am using and updated 87.1, and I think
> that this version is not working.
>
>
>
I'm running v 87.1. Examine your clamd.conf and freshclam.conf files and
ensure they agree on where the cvd files are being place
Hamilton Vera wrote:
Hi list,
Since November, I noticed that clamav 87.1 does not recognize the
following virus.
www.i2.com.br/~hamilton/reg_pass.zip
Try the development version:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ clamscan reg_pass.zip
reg_pass.zip: Worm.Sober.U FOUND
--- SCAN SUMMARY --
On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 13:34:00 -0200 (BRDT) in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hamilton Vera
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> NOD32 detects it as Win32/Sober.Y worm, I'd like to know if it is an
> isolated case.
Don't assume that NOD32 has identified it correctly, other packages
have false positives you know.
--
On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 16:28:47 + in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nigel Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > www.i2.com.br/~hamilton/reg_pass.zip
>
>
> Try the development version:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ clamscan reg_pass.zip
> reg_pass.zip: Worm.Sober.U FOUND
So does that mean a new release is i
Nigel Horne said:
> Hamilton Vera wrote:
>
>> Hi list,
>>
>> Since November, I noticed that clamav 87.1 does not recognize the
>> following virus.
>>
>> www.i2.com.br/~hamilton/reg_pass.zip
>
>
> Try the development version:
>
It would be very nice if future releases of clamd and freshclam pri
Brian Morrison wrote:
On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 16:28:47 + in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nigel Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
www.i2.com.br/~hamilton/reg_pass.zip
Try the development version:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ clamscan reg_pass.zip
reg_pass.zip: Worm.Sober.U FOUND
So does that
Brian Morrison wrote:
On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 16:28:47 + in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nigel Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
www.i2.com.br/~hamilton/reg_pass.zip
Try the development version:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ clamscan reg_pass.zip
reg_pass.zip: Worm.Sober.U FOUND
So does that mean a new
Hamilton Vera wrote:
Hi list,
Since November, I noticed that clamav 87.1 does not recognize the
following virus.
www.i2.com.br/~hamilton/reg_pass.zip
So I posted it in http://cgi.clamav.net/sendvirus.cgi, but I got no answer
NOD32 detects it as Win32/Sober.Y worm, I'd like to know if it
On Dec 19, 2005, at 11:03 AM, aCaB wrote:
Hi kids.
Is the spam going to last long?
Please keep your OT confined to your own blogs/MLs.
Stop abusing everyone's patience.
Maybe people should stop contributing to the thread asking people to
stop contributing to thread.
If attention spans wer
On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 16:39:17 + in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nigel Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Brian Morrison wrote:
>
> >On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 16:28:47 + in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Nigel Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >>>www.i2.com.br/~hamilton/reg_pass.zip
> >>>
> >
When doing a clamscan I see this in the log:
LibClamAV Warning: Unknown VBA version signature 6c 0 0 1
LibClamAV Warning: Guessing little-endian
Should I be worried?
clamscan --version
ClamAV 0.87.1/1213/Mon Dec 19 14:48:34 2005
___
http://lurker.clama
Greetings Clamavonians, I am having trouble getting Vuescan, running on
my Mac OS 10.3.9, to recognize my scanner, and am checking to see if
there are any known conflicts with ClamAV sentry that might help solve
this. Also can't figure out where the Sentry app is so I can swap it in
and out of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Katie Bretsch wrote:
> Greetings Clamavonians, I am having trouble getting Vuescan, running on
> my Mac OS 10.3.9, to recognize my scanner, and am checking to see if
> there are any known conflicts with ClamAV sentry that might help solve
> this. Also
On Dec 19, 2005, at 11:41 AM, René Berber wrote:
Greetings Clamavonians, I am having trouble getting Vuescan, running
on
my Mac OS 10.3.9, to recognize my scanner, and am checking to see if
there are any known conflicts with ClamAV sentry that might help solve
this. Also can't figure out whe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bretsch Katie wrote:
[snip]
>> ClamAV is a _virus scanner_ not a document scanner... so you are
>> looking at the
>> wrong place.
>
>
> Sorry, you misunderstand me. Something unknown is causing my Vuescan SW
> not to recognize the Epson scanner HW. I
des in message 'Re: [Clamav-users] XML and large file scan performance' wrote:
> On 12/17/05, GiM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The 7MB file took 1.5s with the other scanner. Looking at disk
> transfer speeds doesn't come close to explaining the PowerPoint scan
> time (66s).
>
> 750KB Excel fil
Chuck Swiger in message 'Re: [Clamav-users] XML and large file scan
performance' wrote:
>
>
> The 133MB/s # you mentioned is the bus speed, or what you can do ideally if
> you
> only make small transactions which stay in cache. In practice, you top out at
> 90% of the IDE bus speed. And a rea
On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 08:45 -0500, Adam L wrote:
> Well, the funny thing is, top posting ultimately helps my signal to
> noise ratio. I can immediately see if the new content of the mail is
> relevant.
You'd see that with bottom-posted replies, too, if all bottom posters
*also* trimmed the quote
>
>
> --===1749794583==
> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
> protocol="application/pgp-signature";
> boundary="=-T+x+rx4EgXmhQ3m8Pm5w"
>
>
> --=-T+x+rx4EgXmhQ3m8Pm5w
> Content-Type: text/plain
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> On Mon, 200
Dennis Peterson wrote:
[ ...raw MIME message from Steffen Kluge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> deleted... ]
So that you would see what I see when you post I left in all your mime content.
This too is inappropriate in a mail list. If you'd like to trim something,
how about turning this mess off?
This is a
I'll keep this short since I'm not sure that I have permission to
post yet. I'm getting the digest, but being told my postings here
are not allowed. According to what I understood from the various
instructions and nag messages, I must subscribe first to the digest
and that then allows me to post he
On Monday 19 December 2005 06:01 pm, C. Andrews Lavarre wrote:
> I'll keep this short since I'm not sure that I have permission to
> post yet. I'm getting the digest, but being told my postings here
> are not allowed. According to what I understood from the various
> instructions and nag messages,
C. Andrews Lavarre said:
>
> In short, I nuked 0.85.x, got rid of all the files I could find. I
> then installed 0.87.1, checked versions, run both clamscan and
> freshclam just fine manually without any rootmail or messages
> complaints, but when invoked from a shell script that does nothing
> mo
The only ones that vex me are the ones that quote a whole danged
digest. Ahhhh!
On Dec 19, 2005, at 4:56 PM, Dennis Peterson wrote:
So that you would see what I see when you post I left in all your mime
content.
This too is inappropriate in a mail list. If you'd like to trim
som
Chuck Swiger said:
> PS: Delurking to put in my $0.02, but I plan to dodge the rest of this
> thread
> unless something novel appears. (Focus! Stay on target... :-)
Time spent pulling weeds is good for the blooms and makes for a healthy
garden. You can't spend all your time smelling the roses o
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 08:39:10AM -0800, Dennis Peterson wrote:
>
> In fact it would be nice to have a command line switch that generates a
> listing of what is seen and understood by the applications after reading
> the clamd.conf and freshclam.conf files, as well as where they were found.
Po
Bretsch Katie said:
> The only ones that vex me are the ones that quote a whole danged
> digest. Ahhhh!
>
Not something you need fear from me - I'm pretty decent about pruning
unless I'm making a point about pruning hypocrisy.
But you seem to be ok with top posters (and top posting) a
Rob Chanter said:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 08:39:10AM -0800, Dennis Peterson wrote:
>>
>> In fact it would be nice to have a command line switch that generates a
>> listing of what is seen and understood by the applications after reading
>> the clamd.conf and freshclam.conf files, as well as where
Dennis Peterson wrote:
> It might be that you still have an earlier version of clamscan on your
> system and this can be found by running "which clamscan" if you're using
> Linux or Unix.
Thanks to all and you, Dennis in particular.
Here are the results in Fedora Core kernel 2.6.12-1.1376_FC3
On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 16:56 -0800, Dennis Peterson wrote:
> [undecoded PGP/MIME message snipped]
> So that you would see what I see when you post I left in all your mime
> content.
So ELM does actually present a bit stream as sequence of printable
characters? How modern!
> This too is inappropri
Steffen Kluge said:
> On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 16:56 -0800, Dennis Peterson wrote:
>> [undecoded PGP/MIME message snipped]
>> So that you would see what I see when you post I left in all your mime
>> content.
>
> So ELM does actually present a bit stream as sequence of printable
> characters? How mode
C. Andrews Lavarre wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# which clamscan
/usr/local/bin/clamscan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# cd /usr/local/bin/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] bin]# clamscan -V
ClamAV 0.87.1/1211/Fri Dec 16 17:51:35 2005
Try ./clamscan -V or /usr/local/bin/clamscan -V. Otherwise, "cd
/usr/local/bin/" is
44 matches
Mail list logo
