test
-
This email was sent using Fibre Net (Internet Services Provider)
"Webmail !"
http://www.fibre.net.pk/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [E
Sorry for the totally screwed up headers in the previous post.
--
Stephen White \ Oxford University Computing Society
System Administrator\ http://ox.compsoc.net/~swhite/
PGP Key ID: 0xC79E5B6A \ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
> I've just recieved a copy of Win32.Palyh.A.Worm which is not detected by
> clamscan (nor by f-prot so I had to copy it onto a Windows computer to
> find out it's name - yuck).
Thank you, the database has been updated.
Best regards,
Tomasz Kojm
--
oo. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Curious to kn ow if anyone has compiled clamav with MinGW, I have
compiled it okay with cygwin but prefer MinGW
Sean
- --
Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
A: Why is top posting frowned upon?
Normal Email sean AT tcob1 DOT net
We see the following behavior:
--
Checking for a new database - started at Tue May 13 13:09:55 2003
viruses.db is up to date.
viruses.db2 is up to date.
--
Checking for a new database - started at Tue May 13 16:09:55 2003
ERR
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 19 10:49:27 2003
Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 10:49:27 +0100
From: Stephen White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Stat
> We see the following behavior:
>
> --
> Checking for a new database - started at Tue May 13 13:09:55 2003
> viruses.db is up to date.
> viruses.db2 is up to date.
>
> --
> Checking for a new database - started at Tue May 13
Works fine for me after an error.
Does it still fail when manual update works fine ?
Is it possible that your firewall / access is restricted at the time you
do an update?
r
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For ad
On Mon, 19 May 2003, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> > We see the following behavior:
> >
> > --
> > Checking for a new database - started at Tue May 13 13:09:55 2003
> > viruses.db is up to date.
> > viruses.db2 is up to date.
> >
> > -
On Mon, 19 May 2003, Robert Harrison wrote:
> Works fine for me after an error.
>
> Does it still fail when manual update works fine ?
>
> Is it possible that your firewall / access is restricted at the time you
> do an update?
It appears to get the error, and then from that point on, it fails un
On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 12:34:59PM -0400, Ed Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It definitely seems as though freshclam gets "messed up" so that it won't
> work... whenever we restart it, it works immediately first try (unless the
> sig sites are really unreachable).
You should try a `truss -p
I've been running clamav-0.54 + amavisd-new-20030314 + postfix-2.0.9 on a
Solaris 9 (sparc) machine for a few weeks now. Everything worked like a
charm, until today. It seems that clamscan chokes on certain messages,
doing nothing but eating CPU time. Is it a coincidence, or could this
new Worm.
(sorry for my previous message ; the title was all wrong)
I've been running clamav-0.54 + amavisd-new-20030314 + postfix-2.0.9 on a
Solaris 9 (sparc) machine for a few weeks now. Everything worked like a
charm, until today. It seems that clamscan chokes on certain messages,
doing nothing but eat
Original Message
> From Piet Ruyssinck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Monday, 19 May 2003, 20:15
>
> charm, until today. It seems that clamscan chokes on certain messages,
> doing nothing but eating CPU time. Is it a coincidence, or could this
> new Worm.Palyh.A worm have something to do w
--On Monday, May 19, 2003 1:12 PM +0200 Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
is rumoured to have written:
I've just recieved a copy of Win32.Palyh.A.Worm which is not detected by
clamscan (nor by f-prot so I had to copy it onto a Windows computer to
find out it's name - yuck).
This file is now ident
15 matches
Mail list logo
