Re: [clamav-users] Test Message

gt; Thanks Joel. > > -Original Message- > From: clamav-users on behalf of > "Thomas McCourt (tmccourt)" > Reply-To: ClamAV users ML > Date: Friday, May 18, 2018 at 3:04 PM > To: ClamAV users ML > Subject: Re: [clamav-users] Test Message > >Test 2 worked fo

Re: [clamav-users] Test Message

Test 2 working for me as well. :-) Thanks Joel. -Original Message- From: clamav-users on behalf of "Thomas McCourt (tmccourt)" Reply-To: ClamAV users ML Date: Friday, May 18, 2018 at 3:04 PM To: ClamAV users ML Subject: Re: [clamav-users] Test Message Test 2 wor

Re: [clamav-users] Test Message

Test 2 worked for me. From: clamav-users on behalf of "Joel Esler (jesler)" Reply-To: ClamAV users ML Date: Friday, May 18, 2018 at 3:04 PM To: ClamAV users ML Subject: Re: [clamav-users] Test Message Test number 2? On May 18, 2018, at 3:02 PM, Todd Aiken via clamav-users mai

Re: [clamav-users] Test Message

Test number 2? On May 18, 2018, at 3:02 PM, Todd Aiken via clamav-users mailto:clamav-users@lists.clamav.net>> wrote: From: Todd Aiken mailto:todd.ai...@ubishops.ca>> Subject: Re: [clamav-users] Test Message Date: May 18, 2018 at 3:02:22 PM EDT To: ClamAV users ML mailto:

Re: [clamav-users] Test Message

--- Begin Message --- Unfortunately messages are still appearing as attachments. Todd A. Aiken Systems Analyst & Administrator ITS Department BISHOP'S UNIVERSITY 2600 College Street Sherbrooke, Quebec CANADA J1M 1Z7 "What's going on around here?" - RS Having a technology issue?

Re: [clamav-users] test

Sounds good, I've ignored your email. - Tim On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 4:07 PM, Joel Esler (jesler) wrote: > Feel free to ignore this. > > -- > Joel Esler | Talos: Manager | jes...@cisco.com > > > > > > > ___ > clamav-users maili

Re: [Clamav-users] test for SafeBrowsing?

Mark wrote: > -Original Message- > From: clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net > [mailto:clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net] On Behalf Of Daniel J > McDonald > Sent: maandag 30 maart 2009 15:54 > To: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net > Subject: Re: [Clamav-users]

Re: [Clamav-users] test for SafeBrowsing?

-Original Message- From: clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net [mailto:clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net] On Behalf Of Daniel J McDonald Sent: maandag 30 maart 2009 15:54 To: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] test for SafeBrowsing? > > ... I can't

Re: [Clamav-users] test for SafeBrowsing?

nt: donderdag 19 maart 2009 15:14 >> To: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net >> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] test for SafeBrowsing? >> > > I tried all topsites URLs from http://www.stopbadware.org/home/topsites, >> but I can't get any URL to match. :( >

Re: [Clamav-users] test for SafeBrowsing?

On Sat, 2009-03-28 at 17:03 +, Mark wrote: > -Original Message- > From: clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net > [mailto:clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net] On Behalf Of McDonald, Dan > Sent: donderdag 19 maart 2009 15:14 > To: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net > Su

Re: [Clamav-users] test for SafeBrowsing?

-Original Message- From: clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net [mailto:clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net] On Behalf Of McDonald, Dan Sent: donderdag 19 maart 2009 15:14 To: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] test for SafeBrowsing? I tried all topsites URLs from

Re: [Clamav-users] test for SafeBrowsing?

On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 07:20 -0700, Dennis Peterson wrote: > Erwan David wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 01:55:14PM CET, Dennis Peterson > > said: > >> Moray Henderson (ICT) wrote: > From: Török Edwin [mailto:edwinto...@gmail.com] > >> Try using for the URL. > >> > > Is that a

Re: [Clamav-users] test for SafeBrowsing?

At 7:20 AM -0700 3/18/09, Dennis Peterson wrote: >Erwan David wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 01:55:14PM CET, Dennis >>Peterson said: >>> Moray Henderson (ICT) wrote: > From: Török Edwin [mailto:edwinto...@gmail.com] >>> Try using for the URL. >>> >> Is that a requirement?

Re: [Clamav-users] test for SafeBrowsing?

Erwan David wrote: > On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 01:55:14PM CET, Dennis Peterson > said: >> Moray Henderson (ICT) wrote: From: Török Edwin [mailto:edwinto...@gmail.com] >> Try using for the URL. >> > Is that a requirement? If so we should get the spammers on board because some

Re: [Clamav-users] test for SafeBrowsing?

On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 05:55, Dennis Peterson wrote: > Moray Henderson (ICT) wrote: >>> From: Török Edwin [mailto:edwinto...@gmail.com] > Try using for the URL. > Is that a requirement? If so we should get the spammers on board because >>> some of them may not know this :). >>>

Re: [Clamav-users] test for SafeBrowsing?

On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 01:55:14PM CET, Dennis Peterson said: > Moray Henderson (ICT) wrote: > >> From: Török Edwin [mailto:edwinto...@gmail.com] > Try using for the URL. > > >>> Is that a requirement? If so we should get the spammers on board because > >> some of > >>> them may not kn

Re: [Clamav-users] test for SafeBrowsing?

Moray Henderson (ICT) wrote: >> From: Török Edwin [mailto:edwinto...@gmail.com] Try using for the URL. >>> Is that a requirement? If so we should get the spammers on board because >> some of >>> them may not know this :). >> No, there are more places from where URLs can be extracted, but

Re: [Clamav-users] test for SafeBrowsing?

>From: Török Edwin [mailto:edwinto...@gmail.com] >>> Try using for the URL. >>> >> Is that a requirement? If so we should get the spammers on board because >some of >> them may not know this :). > >No, there are more places from where URLs can be extracted, but "href" is one that must work. With

Re: [Clamav-users] test for SafeBrowsing?

On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 16:59 +0200, Török Edwin wrote: > On 2009-03-17 16:57, McDonald, Dan wrote: > > On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 14:08 +, Steve Basford wrote: > > > >>> Is there a test string I can use to see if the SafeBrowsing code is > >>> working properly? I've just set up 0.95RC2 with SafeB

Re: [Clamav-users] test for SafeBrowsing?

On 2009-03-17 17:07, Dennis Peterson wrote: > Török Edwin wrote: > > >> Try using for the URL. >> >> > > Is that a requirement? If so we should get the spammers on board because some > of > them may not know this :). No, there are more places from where URLs can be extracted, but "http:

Re: [Clamav-users] test for SafeBrowsing?

Török Edwin wrote: > > Try using for the URL. > Is that a requirement? If so we should get the spammers on board because some of them may not know this :). dp ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://www.

Re: [Clamav-users] test for SafeBrowsing?

On 2009-03-17 16:57, McDonald, Dan wrote: > On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 14:08 +, Steve Basford wrote: > >>> Is there a test string I can use to see if the SafeBrowsing code is >>> working properly? I've just set up 0.95RC2 with SafeBrowsing enabled. >>> I've sent an EICAR and detected that, and s

Re: [Clamav-users] test for SafeBrowsing?

On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 14:08 +, Steve Basford wrote: > > Is there a test string I can use to see if the SafeBrowsing code is > > working properly? I've just set up 0.95RC2 with SafeBrowsing enabled. > > I've sent an EICAR and detected that, and scanned > > the /usr/share/doc/clamav-0.95/test/ d

Re: [Clamav-users] test for SafeBrowsing?

On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 14:08 +, Steve Basford wrote: > > Is there a test string I can use to see if the SafeBrowsing code is > > working properly? I've just set up 0.95RC2 with SafeBrowsing enabled. > > I've sent an EICAR and detected that, and scanned > > the /usr/share/doc/clamav-0.95/test/ d

Re: [Clamav-users] test for SafeBrowsing?

On 2009-03-17 15:58, McDonald, Dan wrote: > Is there a test string I can use to see if the SafeBrowsing code is > working properly? I've just set up 0.95RC2 with SafeBrowsing enabled. > I've sent an EICAR and detected that, and scanned > the /usr/share/doc/clamav-0.95/test/ directory to find ClamA

Re: [Clamav-users] test for SafeBrowsing?

> Is there a test string I can use to see if the SafeBrowsing code is > working properly? I've just set up 0.95RC2 with SafeBrowsing enabled. > I've sent an EICAR and detected that, and scanned > the /usr/share/doc/clamav-0.95/test/ directory to find ClamAV-Test-File, > but I would like to see a S

Re: [Clamav-users] test virus # 14 - my setup or something else?

On Thursday 24 Mar 2005 18:36, Shayne Lebrun wrote: > You need to decode TNEFs with something else before passing them to Clam. This restriction will be lifted soon (with any luck and a few samples for testing). -- Nigel Horne. Arranger, Composer, Typesetter. NJH Music, Barnsley, UK. ICQ#2025

Re: [Clamav-users] test virus # 14 - my setup or something else?

On Thu, 24 Mar 2005, Sean Franklin wrote: > http://www.testvirus.org/ > Anyway, #14 got thru this time: > Test #14: Eicar virus sent in a Microsoft TNEF file (winmail.dat) I noticed the same thing this week. I believe, as Nigel mentioned, that the winmail.dat file is corrupt and cannot be read.

RE: [Clamav-users] test virus # 14 - my setup or something else?

> It caught the other 24. Is there something special about the TNEF > file that needs to be configured in clamd.conf or clamsmtpd.conf to > scan that or is it something else. Microsoft TNEF is neither a transport, nor neutral, nor encoding, nor a format. Discuss. You need to decode TNEFs with so

Re: [Clamav-users] test virus # 14 - my setup or something else?

On Thursday 24 Mar 2005 18:16, Sean Franklin wrote: > Hello, > I periodically check the mail server using the website: > http://www.testvirus.org/ > I can't remember from last time to this time if everything > except 24/25 got blocked or if 14 was a problem last time too. > (24 and 25 are non-virus

Re: [Clamav-users] Test installation

Daniel J McDonald wrote: On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 04:39:14PM +0100, Michel Machado wrote: Hi all, I am new with linux, but i could install it in the PC (Red hat 9). Now i have a problem with clamav0.83. In the doc you can see the following: did you install it from source, or an rpm? To

Re: [Clamav-users] Test installation

On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 04:39:14PM +0100, Michel Machado wrote: > Hi all, > > I am new with linux, but i could install it in the PC (Red hat 9). Now > i have a problem with clamav0.83. In the doc you can see the following: did you install it from source, or an rpm? > > To test your installati

Re: [Clamav-users] Test installation

Michel Machado a écrit : > Hi all, > > I am new with linux, but i could install it in the PC (Red hat 9). Now > i have a problem with clamav0.83. In the doc you can see the following: > > To test your installation execute: > > $ ~/clamav/bin/freshclam > $ ~/clamav/bin/clamscan > > When the in

Re: [Clamav-users] Test

Tomasz Kojm wrote: Please ignore this message. Ummm, make me ? Rick ___ http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users

Re: [Clamav-users] test windows exploit sigs

On Sat, 2004-09-25 at 10:35, Andy Fiddaman wrote: > A quick question for the database maintainers though - are you planning to > add a signature for this exploit (particularly now that an exploit toolkit > exists) ? All of my commercial scanners here now detect it - F-Prot even > released a new ve

Re: [Clamav-users] test windows exploit sigs

Slight modification to the last one. The new .ndb file allows the signature offset to be defined, so instead of * in the third field you should put 0 to anchor the JPEG magic number to the start of the file. The 5 means it is definitely a graphics file before it is checked against the signature but

Re: [Clamav-users] test windows exploit sigs

On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ; Hi All, ; ; I've done done my *first* ndb sigs for some of the current windows expolits: ; ; JS.dragdrop.1:3:*:64796E7372633D22*2E65786522 ; JS.dragdrop.2:3:*:666F6C6465723D227368656C6C??7374617274757022 ; exploit.jpg:5:*:FFD8FF(E0|FE)*FFFE00(00|01)

Re: [Clamav-users] test message

On Sat, 3 Apr 2004 05:51:50 GMT Tomasz Klim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Heck Thomasz if you want viruses I have over 2000 caught in the past > > > > couple months. 8*)) > > Could you please send me a copy of them? > > Thanks! This is not a virus-exchange but the clamav-users mailing list. P

Re: [Clamav-users] test message

> Heck Thomasz if you want viruses I have over 2000 caught in the past > couple months. 8*)) Could you please send me a copy of them? Thanks! -- Tomasz Klim, [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.euroneto.pl Phone: +48 61 8433535 Fax: +48 61 8434455 Euronet Sp. z o.o., Dabr

Re: [Clamav-users] test message

Antony Stone wrote: On Friday 02 April 2004 6:56 pm, Doc Schneider wrote: Tomasz Klim wrote: This is a test message only. I'm sending it only to announce my e-mail address to all infected e-mail clients, to provoke them to send a copy of viruses. Don't be angry. Heck Thomasz if you want viruse

Re: [Clamav-users] test message

On Friday 02 April 2004 6:56 pm, Doc Schneider wrote: > Tomasz Klim wrote: > > This is a test message only. I'm sending it only to announce > > my e-mail address to all infected e-mail clients, to provoke > > them to send a copy of viruses. Don't be angry. > > Heck Thomasz if you want viruses I ha

Re: [Clamav-users] test message

On Fri, 02 Apr 2004 at 14:55:27 +, Tomasz Klim wrote: > This is a test message only. I'm sending it only to announce > my e-mail address to all infected e-mail clients, to provoke > them to send a copy of viruses. Don't be angry. > > -- > Tomasz Klim, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.eu

Re: [Clamav-users] test message

Tomasz Klim wrote: This is a test message only. I'm sending it only to announce my e-mail address to all infected e-mail clients, to provoke them to send a copy of viruses. Don't be angry. Heck Thomasz if you want viruses I have over 2000 caught in the past couple months. 8*)) -Doc --- MomNDoc