On 2009-03-17 16:57, McDonald, Dan wrote: > On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 14:08 +0000, Steve Basford wrote: > >>> Is there a test string I can use to see if the SafeBrowsing code is >>> working properly? I've just set up 0.95RC2 with SafeBrowsing enabled. >>> I've sent an EICAR and detected that, and scanned >>> the /usr/share/doc/clamav-0.95/test/ directory to find ClamAV-Test-File, >>> but I would like to see a SafeBrowsing hit.... >>> >> Does this email work?... (the site in the url is down but still in the list) >> >> http://pastebin.com/m13232c54 >> > > Nope. It was killed as spam, but clamd didn't burble... > Mar 17 09:33:36 foo amavis[5475]: (05475-17) SPAM, <d...@example.com> -> > <dan.mcdon...@austinenergy.com>, Yes, score=6.319 tag=-99 tag2=4.5 > kill=6.31 tests=[BOTNET_SOHO=-0.1, DATE_IN_PAST_06_12=1.854, > HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG=1.052, L_P0F_UNKN=0.8, > MIME_HTML_ONLY=1.672, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, RELAY_US=0.01, > SPF_PASS=-0.001, TVD_SPACE_RATIO=2.899, URIBL_OB_SURBL=2.132], > autolearn=disabled, quarantine bs0Q4dhJN1Kl (spam-quarantine) > > clamd appears to be working: > Tue Mar 17 09:29:11 2009 > -> /var/lib/amavis/tmp/amavis-20090317T042204-05469/parts/p002: > Sanesecurity.Junk.11642.UNOFFICIAL FOUND > > I replaced the URL with one from the stopbadware.org topten that showed > up on http://www.google.com/safebrowsing/diagnostic?site=http://.... > That e-mail was passed through to my mailbox. >
Try using <a href="..."> for the URL. Best regards, --Edwin _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
