Re: [clamav-users] Problems subscribing to lists

sday, July 17, 2024 6:21 AM To: Micah Snyder (micasnyd) ; ClamAV Subject: Re: [clamav-users] Problems subscribing to lists Thank you so much for your kind help Micah. Do I understand correctly that clam AV update announcements will now be sent to me automatically by email? Do I now send m

Re: [clamav-users] Problems subscribing to lists

ng to your information. I have not joined such a thing before so I am completely ignorant I'm afraid. Best wishes   Sarah Original message From: "Micah Snyder (micasnyd)" Date: 17/07/2024 5:30 am (GMT+12:00) To: ClamAV Cc: sarahayre Subject: Re: [clamav-users]

Re: [clamav-users] Problems subscribing to lists

Hi Sarah, Our clamav-announce emailer isn't supposed to require approval from the list admin in order to subscribe, thought it does require confirmation from an email so others can't just sign you up. It seems like that setting changed on its own somewhere around early October, 2023. I mostly

Re: [clamav-users] problems with freshclam: Incremental update failed

Hi Joel, thanks so much for the info. So things seem to be alright in the future. That´s great news. Many thanks again and many greetings. Rosika and Christian jesler at cisco.com

Re: [clamav-users] problems with freshclam: Incremental update failed

Christian, The below is correct. We published a new main.cvd and daily.cvd yesterday, and in order to make your FreshClam instance force download the new files, we have to publish a “blank” file, so that FreshClam sees it as an error, and then fails over to pick up the full file. From that po

Re: [clamav-users] Problems compiling 0.102.4 on OLD system

No worries Michael! Yes we're doing traversal from root to avoid that issue. :-) Kevin: Any chance you can upgrade those old systems? We try to support roughly the last 2 LTS releases for major distros / operating systems but don't have time to go out of our way to maintain compatibility wit

Re: [clamav-users] Problems compiling 0.102.4 on OLD system

Achtung, falscher Empfänger -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: clamav-users Im Auftrag von Mark Fortescue via clamav-users Gesendet: Freitag, 17. Juli 2020 12:46 An: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net Cc: Mark Fortescue Betreff: Re: [clamav-users] Problems compiling 0.102.4 on OLD system Hi

Re: [clamav-users] Problems compiling 0.102.4 on OLD system

Hi Kevin, It looks like you will have to create/enable private versions of the openat(), ranameat() and unlinkat() functions. These can be simulated using regular C functions open(), unlink(), rename(), stat() and readdir(). You will need to get manual pages for openat(), ranameat() and un

Re: [clamav-users] Problems compiling 0.102.4 on OLD system

On 2020-07-16 19:10, Michael Orlitzky via clamav-users wrote: > > Micah: openat() only provides "one level of safety" in that when opening > /foo/bar/baz, it ensures that "baz" is where you think it is. You may > want to investigate whether or not an attacker can replace "bar" by a > symlink in th

Re: [clamav-users] Problems compiling 0.102.4 on OLD system

On 2020-07-16 17:22, Kevin A. McGrail via clamav-users wrote: > Hi, I have an old system I'm compiling. > > I have 0.102.3 working on it. > > Here's the config line: > > ... >   CCLD clamscan > actions.o: In function `traverse_to': > ../shared/actions.c:328: undefined reference to `openat' >

Re: [clamav-users] Problems scanning for PUAs

I think the PUA version are just potentially unwanted things that exhibit trojan-like behavior but aren't confirmed trojans. As for the original question, it looks like it's only using the first part of that to determine the group of PUAs to ignore. These are the 'PUA' families (and associated si

Re: [clamav-users] Problems scanning for PUAs

Also, what is the difference between e.g. Win.Trojan and PUA.Win.Trojan? Why would a trojan be a PUA? -- -Dan Q On Thu, 30 May 2019 17:02:08 -0400 (EDT), Daniel Quintiliani via clamav-users wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to scan files for PUAs. > When you do that, you get a lot of packers show

Re: [clamav-users] Problems on your side (Server infrastructure)

No because since several days the mails where dropped because of this problem; I just noticed this now, that I didn't receive any mail since a few days ... On Tue, June 19, 2018 12:05, Al Varnell wrote: > Did you read the posting "clamav list spf problem" from Andrew McGlashan > about an hour and

Re: [clamav-users] Problems on your side (Server infrastructure)

Did you read the posting "clamav list spf problem" from Andrew McGlashan about an hour and a half ago? -Al- On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 02:56 AM, Walter H. wrote: > Hello, > > since a few days I get several messages like these > > Jun 18 14:40:46 vhost01 postfix/cleanup[21415]: 1A40240FB1: discard

Re: [clamav-users] Problems with 3rd party sigs

On 31 March 2017 18:45:58 Mark Foley wrote: Per advice on this list, I downloaded and installed the clamav-unofficial-sigs scripts from the link on Sanesecurity. 2. I run a cron'd clamscan job to scan mail folders several time a day. I get the following errors which are new since installin

Re: [clamav-users] Problems with 3rd party sigs

They can be ignored. For yara rules, ClamAV currently ignores any containing errors or unsupported features. Steve On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 2:30 PM, Mark Foley wrote: > On Fri, 31 Mar 2017 14:01:29 -0400 Steven Morgan > wrote: > > > > Thanks Steve. Is then there a way to disable the pe rules or

Re: [clamav-users] Problems with 3rd party sigs

On Fri, 31 Mar 2017 14:01:29 -0400 Steven Morgan wrote: > Thanks Steve. Is then there a way to disable the pe rules or do I just have to ignore these messages? --Mark > Mark, > > The pe import module of yara rules is not currently implemented in ClamAV. > Other specifics of using yara rules in

Re: [clamav-users] Problems with 3rd party sigs

Mark, The pe import module of yara rules is not currently implemented in ClamAV. Other specifics of using yara rules in Clam may be found in docs/signatures.pdf. Also, looks like errors in EMAIL_Cryptowall.yar yara rule? Hope this helps, Steve On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 1:45 PM, Mark Foley wrote:

Re: [clamav-users] Problems with safe browsing

You missed my point. It was it was a shame that safe browsing sigs only for of files that look like email. > On Nov 11, 2016, at 12:43 AM, Gene Heskett wrote: > > On Thursday 10 November 2016 17:45:24 TR Shaw wrote: > >> Thanks, all. >> >> However its a real shame that it will not scan generi

Re: [clamav-users] Problems with safe browsing

On Thursday 10 November 2016 17:45:24 TR Shaw wrote: > Thanks, all. > > However its a real shame that it will not scan generic files looking > for bad urls rather than only scanning email files. > > I was going to to use clamav to scan disk drives for scripts that used > uris in safe browsing So m

Re: [clamav-users] Problems with safe browsing

Thanks, all. However its a real shame that it will not scan generic files looking for bad urls rather than only scanning email files. I was going to to use clamav to scan disk drives for scripts that used uris in safe browsing So much of that :-( Tom > On Nov 10, 2016, at 3:46 PM, Steve basfo

Re: [clamav-users] Problems with safe browsing

Hi Tom, Create a standard header body formatted email and then insert the address at the end. It will be detected. Just placing on a line.. it won't be detected, Cheers, Steve Twitter: @sanesecurity On 10 November 2016 19:53:05 TR Shaw wrote: I have freshclam set to load safe browsin

Re: [clamav-users] Problems with safe browsing

Hi Tom, Is it an email file? Looks like the safebrowsing checks only occur during email file parsing. Hope this helps, Steve ___ clamav-users mailing list clamav-users@lists.clamav.net http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users Help

Re: [clamav-users] Problems with daily db?

Just wanted to close out my report on this. Results of running sigtool -i on daily.cld: > File: /usr/local/clamXav/share/clamav/daily.cld > Build time: 21 Sep 2015 12:36 -0400 > Version: 20930 > Signatures: 1587117 > Functionality level: 63 > Builder: neo > LibClamAV Warning:

Re: [clamav-users] Problems with daily db?

All, This is a set of regex signatures I published. These lines in the signature database should have been ignored by ClamAV versions previous to 0.99. Given the problems that alternate versions of ClamAV have, I am going to drop these signatures. Thanks, Shaun Hurley On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 1:

Re: [clamav-users] Problems with daily db?

Hey folks, just closing the loop on this, unsurprisingly, this turned out to be a problem on our side. I had forgotten but we were running a custom build of clamav a couple of commits before the 0.98.7 release that apparently had a signature parsing regression, upgrading to the release commit fixed

Re: [clamav-users] Problems with daily db?

I just had a Mac OS X 10.11/ClamXav 2.8.5/ClamAV 0.98.7 user with a similar situation. Appears to be in the US, but I need to get more information to verify that and the results of sigtool -i: Checking official ClamAV definitions -- ClamAV update process star

Re: [clamav-users] Problems with daily db?

Odd, we run Debian (Jessie) Linux and we see this problem on quite a few of our hosts; nothing obviously relevant seems to have changed on our side. We will keep looking and report back. > On Oct 15, 2015, at 1:15 PM, Steven Morgan wrote: > > Thanks, that is working for me with ClamAV 0.98.7.

Re: [clamav-users] Problems with daily db?

Thanks, that is working for me with ClamAV 0.98.7. It even worked using http://scanii-assets.s3.amazonaws.com/daily.cvd. What OS and hardware are you using? On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 1:30 PM, Rafael Ferreira wrote: > 0.98.7 > > > On Oct 15, 2015, at 8:46 AM, Steven Morgan > wrote: > > > > Rafael,

Re: [clamav-users] Problems with daily db?

Can you paste here the output of running "sigtool -i" against your daily.cvd? Thanks, - Alain On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 1:30 PM, Rafael Ferreira wrote: > 0.98.7 > > > On Oct 15, 2015, at 8:46 AM, Steven Morgan > wrote: > > > > Rafael, > > > > I don't see this. Which version of ClamAV are you us

Re: [clamav-users] Problems with daily db?

0.98.7 > On Oct 15, 2015, at 8:46 AM, Steven Morgan wrote: > > Rafael, > > I don't see this. Which version of ClamAV are you using? > > Steve > > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 11:24 AM, Rafael Ferreira > wrote: > >> Howdy folks, we started noticing problems with daily.cvd: >> >> Retrieving h

Re: [clamav-users] Problems with daily db?

Rafael, I don't see this. Which version of ClamAV are you using? Steve On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 11:24 AM, Rafael Ferreira wrote: > Howdy folks, we started noticing problems with daily.cvd: > > Retrieving http://scanii-assets.s3.amazonaws.com/daily.cvd > > Trying to download http://scanii-asset

Re: [clamav-users] problems with SWF and TNEF

My suggestion would be to conduct a debug scan of the folder which will produce a ton of data, but should allow you to pinpoint the files involved. clamscan --debug -Al- On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Walter Lapchynski wrote: > > I have a folder that includes some backups that is triggerin

Re: [clamav-users] Problems with obfuscated code (php)

Sorry, I mistyped my previous reply, meant to say: You may find the ClamAV "bytecode compiler" useful in doing this. http://www.clamav.net/lang/en/download/sources/ On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 2:53 PM, Steven Morgan wrote: > Torge, > > You may find the ClamAV useful in doing this. > > http://www.

Re: [clamav-users] Problems with obfuscated code (php)

Torge, You may find the ClamAV useful in doing this. http://www.clamav.net/lang/en/download/sources/ On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 12:08 PM, Torge Husfeldt wrote: > Hi List, > > I have a problem with obfuscated php-code of well-known shells. > I have prepared an example where clamav correctly detect

Re: [clamav-users] Problems with signature mirrors today?

On 11/9/12 11:37 PM, "sys...@ra-schaal.de" wrote: > Am 09.11.2012 18:23, schrieb Chris Stone: >> Seeing a lot of: >> >> Current working dir is /usr/local/share/clamav >> Max retries == 3 >> ClamAV update process started at Fri Nov 9 10:22:52 2012 >> Using IPv6 aware code >> If-Modified-Since: T

Re: [clamav-users] Problems with signature mirrors today?

Am 09.11.2012 18:23, schrieb Chris Stone: > Seeing a lot of: > > Current working dir is /usr/local/share/clamav > Max retries == 3 > ClamAV update process started at Fri Nov 9 10:22:52 2012 > Using IPv6 aware code > If-Modified-Since: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 14:34:20 GMT > Reading CVD header (main.cvd):

Re: [clamav-users] Problems with signature mirrors today?

Yes, looks good to me now Thanks! Chris On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Matt Olney wrote: > Folks, > > We seem to have resolved the issue. Mirrors should be syncing now. Let us > know if you see anything else. > > Matt > > On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Nigel Houghton >wrote: > >

Re: [clamav-users] Problems with signature mirrors today?

Folks, We seem to have resolved the issue. Mirrors should be syncing now. Let us know if you see anything else. Matt On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Nigel Houghton wrote: > > On Nov 9, 2012, at 12:38 PM, José Celestino wrote: > > > On Sex, 2012-11-09 at 10:23 -0700, Chris Stone wrote: > >>

Re: [clamav-users] Problems with signature mirrors today?

On Nov 9, 2012, at 12:38 PM, José Celestino wrote: > On Sex, 2012-11-09 at 10:23 -0700, Chris Stone wrote: >> Seeing a lot of: >> >> Current working dir is /usr/local/share/clamav >> Max retries == 3 >> ClamAV update process started at Fri Nov 9 10:22:52 2012 >> Using IPv6 aware code >> If-Mod

Re: [clamav-users] Problems with signature mirrors today?

Hey guys, thanks for the heads up. We're checking into it now. Matt On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 12:38 PM, José Celestino wrote: > On Sex, 2012-11-09 at 10:23 -0700, Chris Stone wrote: > > Seeing a lot of: > > > > Current working dir is /usr/local/share/clamav > > Max retries == 3 > > ClamAV update

Re: [clamav-users] Problems with signature mirrors today?

On Sex, 2012-11-09 at 10:23 -0700, Chris Stone wrote: > Seeing a lot of: > > Current working dir is /usr/local/share/clamav > Max retries == 3 > ClamAV update process started at Fri Nov 9 10:22:52 2012 > Using IPv6 aware code > If-Modified-Since: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 14:34:20 GMT > Reading CVD header

Re: [clamav-users] Problems detecting PHP bots

On Aug 20, 2012, at 6:46 AM, Henri Salo wrote: > Is there a way to configure ClamAV to scan also files with starting > GIF87a/GIF89a? We get attacks like this daily. I assume you mean detecting PHP files with that at the beginning? -- Joel Esler Senior Research Engineer, VRT OpenSource Commu

Re: [clamav-users] Problems detecting PHP bots

> -Original Message- > From: clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net [mailto:clamav-users- > boun...@lists.clamav.net] On Behalf Of Henri Salo > Subject: [clamav-users] Problems detecting PHP bots > > Hello, > > Is there a way to configure ClamAV to scan also files with starting > GIF87a/GI

Re: [clamav-users] Problems with clamav-milter: "clamfi_eom: FD send failed: Broken pipe"

Hi there, On Fri, 8 Jun 2012, c0re wrote: Architecture is pretty simple: 1st server with clamd, clamav-milter. 2nd server with sendmail. You're stil being pretty economical with the information. What's the network connection between the servers? What volumes of traffic does it carry? So w

Re: [clamav-users] Problems with clamav-milter: "clamfi_eom: FD send failed: Broken pipe"

On 06/07/12 11:40, c0re wrote: > I decided to move clamav to dedicated server. Hi, I assume you are running the milter on the same machine as clamd and letting them talk over a unix socket. > Jun 7 12:37:08 avsrv clamav-milter[29989]: clamfi_eom: FD send > failed: Broken pipe > Jun 7 12:37:08 a

Re: [clamav-users] Problems with clamav-milter: "clamfi_eom: FD send failed: Broken pipe"

2012/6/7 G.W. Haywood : > Hi there, > > > On Thu, 7 Jun 2012, c0re wrote: > >> In clamav-milter logs I see only this: >> >> Jun  7 12:37:08 avsrv clamav-milter[29989]: clamfi_eom: FD send >> failed: Broken pipe >> Jun  7 12:37:08 avsrv clamav-milter[29989]: FD send failed >> >> So what's happening

Re: [clamav-users] Problems with clamav-milter: "clamfi_eom: FD send failed: Broken pipe"

Hi there, On Thu, 7 Jun 2012, c0re wrote: In clamav-milter logs I see only this: Jun 7 12:37:08 avsrv clamav-milter[29989]: clamfi_eom: FD send failed: Broken pipe Jun 7 12:37:08 avsrv clamav-milter[29989]: FD send failed So what's happening here? I don't know. :) The exact architecture

Re: [clamav-users] Problems with permissions and clamav-unofficial-sigs

> I've enabled AllowSupplementalGroups, and the DatabaseOwner is > clamupdate, as per the default. I've also added amavis (the clamd > user) to the clamupdate group. > > However, freshclam still fails to communicate with clamd with > "connect(): Permission denied" because the socket is owned by am

Re: [clamav-users] Problems with permissions and clamav-unofficial-sigs

Hi, >> clamd runs as user amavis.amavis, which is who should own >> /var/lib/clamav and the files within, correct? And >> /var/lib/clamav-unofficial-sigs is owned by clamupdate.clamupdate. >> >> freshclam.conf has the database owner set to amavis. > > I actually just finished a from-scratch setup

Re: [clamav-users] Problems with permissions and clamav-unofficial-sigs

> clamd runs as user amavis.amavis, which is who should own > /var/lib/clamav and the files within, correct? And > /var/lib/clamav-unofficial-sigs is owned by clamupdate.clamupdate. > > freshclam.conf has the database owner set to amavis. I actually just finished a from-scratch setup like this, h

Re: [clamav-users] problems with daily.cld 13960

Still on 0.97.1, but since daily.cld updated to 13961 (and later 13962), the clamd daemon has remained running. (I will update to 0.97.3 in the morning). Thanks David --On Thursday, November 17, 2011 7:47 PM +0200 Török Edwin wrote: On 11/17/2011 06:57 PM, David Alix wrote: Is anyone els

Re: [clamav-users] problems with daily.cld 13960

On 11/17/2011 06:57 PM, David Alix wrote: > Is anyone else having problems with clamd after the daily.cld updated to > version 13960. I'm running clamd 0.97.1, on Solaris 9 SPARC. SInce 13960 > was installed, clamd abends, with no error messages > anywhere. Sometimes clamd will run for up to 2

Re: [clamav-users] problems with daily.cld 13960

My versions are the same: main.cld is up to date (version: 54, sigs: 1044387, f-level: 60, builder: sven) daily.cld is up to date (version: 13960, sigs: 30564, f-level: 60, builder: ccordes) bytecode.cld is up to date (version: 152, sigs: 38, f-level: 60, builder: edwin) --On Thursday, Nove

Re: [clamav-users] problems with daily.cld 13960

On 17 Nov 2011 at 8:57, David Alix wrote: > Is anyone else having problems with clamd after the daily.cld updated to > version 13960. I'm running clamd 0.97.1, on Solaris 9 SPARC. SInce 13960 > was installed, clamd abends, with no error messages anywhere. Sometimes > clamd will run for up to

Re: [clamav-users] Problems compiling 0.97.2 on Solaris 9

On 8/19/2011 2:40 PM, Tom Goerger wrote: > I'm attempting to compile a 64 bit version of 0.97.2 on Solaris 9, and > running into some issues. Version 0.96.4 compiled fine in the same > environment that we're using now, but both this version and 0.97.1 did not > seem to compile correctly. The con

Re: [clamav-users] Problems compiling 0.97.2 on Solaris 9

Hi-- On Aug 19, 2011, at 12:40 PM, Tom Goerger wrote: > I'm attempting to compile a 64 bit version of 0.97.2 on Solaris 9, and > running into some issues. Version 0.96.4 compiled fine in the same > environment that we're using now, but both this version and 0.97.1 did not > seem to compile correc

Re: [clamav-users] Problems with bytecode.cvd

On Wed, 19 Jan 2011, Daniel Gomes wrote: > Today my freshclam updated the bytecode.cld to version 118. The problem > is that, after update, my servers has greatly increased the load > averages. You can limit the consequences of bad bytecode by reducing the bytecode timeout. The default is 60s but

Re: [Clamav-users] Problems building 0.96.3 on Solaris 9/10

On 10/5/2010 5:08 PM, Tom Goerger wrote: > Now, I'm seeing > > configure:3438: ./conftest > ld.so.1: conftest: fatal: libstdc++.so.4: open failed: No such file or > directory > ./configure: line 1: 5623 Killed ./conftest$ac_cv_exeext > configure:3442: $? = 137 > configure:3449:

Re: [Clamav-users] Problems building 0.96.3 on Solaris 9/10

Okay, that helps. Thanks. Now, I'm seeing configure:3438: ./conftest ld.so.1: conftest: fatal: libstdc++.so.4: open failed: No such file or directory ./configure: line 1: 5623 Killed ./conftest$ac_cv_exeext configure:3442: $? = 137 configure:3449: error: in `/src/objss9/clamav-0

Re: [Clamav-users] Problems building 0.96.3 on Solaris 9/10

On 10/5/2010 4:11 PM, Tom Goerger wrote: > Well, that's part of the problem. Even when I explicitly set CXX=g++, I > don't see any errors relating to g++ in config.log. The only reference I'm > seeing to "cannot run C++ compiled programs" comes in STDOUT, and isn't > repeated in the log. You ar

Re: [Clamav-users] Problems building 0.96.3 on Solaris 9/10

Well, that's part of the problem. Even when I explicitly set CXX=g++, I don't see any errors relating to g++ in config.log. The only reference I'm seeing to "cannot run C++ compiled programs" comes in STDOUT, and isn't repeated in the log. This is what I'm seeing in STDOUT, if it helps: checking

Re: [Clamav-users] Problems building 0.96.3 on Solaris 9/10

On 10/5/2010 3:06 PM, Tom Goerger wrote: > The first error I'm seeing has to do with ac_nonexistent.h being not found. > I'm not sure what package that module should be part of. I do have g++ > installed, maybe we're running an outdated version? It's 3.4.5. Could be > totally offbase with that

Re: [Clamav-users] Problems building 0.96.3 on Solaris 9/10

The first error I'm seeing has to do with ac_nonexistent.h being not found. I'm not sure what package that module should be part of. I do have g++ installed, maybe we're running an outdated version? It's 3.4.5. Could be totally offbase with that, but it's certainly the first failure I encounter

Re: [Clamav-users] Problems building 0.96.3 on Solaris 9/10

On 10/4/2010 2:24 PM, Tom Goerger wrote: > We're using gcc to compile. No parameters on configure. The same setup was > used to compile 0.95.2 just fine, without any problems, but it's bailing > here without giving me a reason that I can decipher, at least. When you get a "cannot run C++ compil

Re: [Clamav-users] Problems building 0.96.3 on Solaris 9/10

We're using gcc to compile. No parameters on configure. The same setup was used to compile 0.95.2 just fine, without any problems, but it's bailing here without giving me a reason that I can decipher, at least. On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 2:19 PM, René Berber wrote: > On 10/4/2010 1:28 PM, Tom Goer

Re: [Clamav-users] Problems building 0.96.3 on Solaris 9/10

On 10/4/2010 1:28 PM, Tom Goerger wrote: > I'm having problems building 0.96.3 on Solaris 9 and 10. I believe I've > copied in the appropriate sections of configure and make below. Can anyone > tell me why this might be failing? Or, what other information I can provide > that might help? What

Re: [Clamav-users] Problems building 0.96.3 on Solaris 9/10

On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 8:28 PM, Tom Goerger wrote: > I'm having problems building 0.96.3 on Solaris 9 and 10.  I believe I've > copied in the appropriate sections of configure and make below.  Can anyone > tell me why this might be failing?  Or, what other information I can provide > that might he

Re: [Clamav-users] Problems with db.ca.clamav.net mirror

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jim Preston wrote: > On Apr 23, 2010, at 8:01 AM, Frank Bures wrote: > >> I've seen lots of problems with db.ca.clamav.net mirror in the last >> couple >> of days. I am getting >> >> freshclam[31063]: getfile: Error while reading database from >> db.

Re: [Clamav-users] Problems with db.ca.clamav.net mirror

> > On 4/23/10 10:46 AM, "Dennis Peterson" wrote: > > > On 4/23/10 8:41 AM, Jim Preston wrote: > > > >> Just a question, but what time is freshclam running? Most of the time a > >> majority of people run freshclam at the top of the hour which means you > >> are in heavy competition for resource

Re: [Clamav-users] Problems with db.ca.clamav.net mirror

On 4/23/10 10:46 AM, "Dennis Peterson" wrote: > On 4/23/10 8:41 AM, Jim Preston wrote: > >> Just a question, but what time is freshclam running? Most of the time a >> majority of people run freshclam at the top of the hour which means you >> are in heavy competition for resources. I have mine se

Re: [Clamav-users] Problems with db.ca.clamav.net mirror

On Apr 23, 2010, at 8:46 AM, Dennis Peterson wrote: On 4/23/10 8:41 AM, Jim Preston wrote: Just a question, but what time is freshclam running? Most of the time a majority of people run freshclam at the top of the hour which means you are in heavy competition for resources. I have mine set

Re: [Clamav-users] Problems with db.ca.clamav.net mirror

On 4/23/10 8:41 AM, Jim Preston wrote: Just a question, but what time is freshclam running? Most of the time a majority of people run freshclam at the top of the hour which means you are in heavy competition for resources. I have mine set to run via cron at ten minutes after the hour. Jim You

Re: [Clamav-users] Problems with db.ca.clamav.net mirror

On Apr 23, 2010, at 8:01 AM, Frank Bures wrote: I've seen lots of problems with db.ca.clamav.net mirror in the last couple of days. I am getting freshclam[31063]: getfile: Error while reading database from db.ca.clamav.net several times a day. The freshclam then defaults to db.us.clam

Re: [Clamav-users] Problems installing 0.95.3

On Sun, 8 Nov 2009, Török Edwin wrote: You should apply the patch with: patch -p1 Ah, thank you! The "-p1" was the necessary voodoo. It wasn't on the download page or on the Bug #1737 page, which is where you are directed for more information. I didn't think to look on the wiki. It might

Re: [Clamav-users] Problems installing 0.95.3

On 2009-11-08 00:58, jef moskot wrote: > Will a patched version of the installation package be made publically > available? We don't have git installed and there are many system > complaints when a patch attempt is made. (Maybe due to the "--git" > option in the diff lines?) > > Installing git di

Re: [Clamav-users] Problems installing 0.95.3

Will a patched version of the installation package be made publically available? We don't have git installed and there are many system complaints when a patch attempt is made. (Maybe due to the "--git" option in the diff lines?) Installing git didn't make the error magically go away, and rat

Re: [Clamav-users] Problems installing 0.95.3

clamav-0.95.3 now compiles and installs on FreeBSD 7.0 after applying the patch. http://git.clamav.net/gitweb?p=clamav-devel.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=6238a5ca06c07931b2f6ace62601ef43807df8e2;hp=55d97736bd289b53c93b652d88e5acd1886ec1bc Thanks very much to everyone for your help. Regards, Daniel

Re: [Clamav-users] Problems installing 0.95.3

Original Message From: clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net [mailto:clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net] On Behalf Of Francis Stevens Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 11:02 AM To: ClamAV users ML Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Problems installing 0.95.3 > Bug #1738 raised. Sorry ab

Re: [Clamav-users] Problems installing 0.95.3

Bug #1738 raised. FAS Török Edwin wrote: On 2009-10-29 15:37, Rick Cooper wrote: Original Message From: clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net [mailto:clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net] On Behalf Of Francis Stevens Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 6:43 AM To: ClamAV users ML Subject

Re: [Clamav-users] Problems installing 0.95.3

Török Edwin wrote: > On 2009-10-29 16:33, Bill Landry wrote: >> Török Edwin wrote: >> >>> On 2009-10-29 16:27, Bill Landry wrote: >>> That didn't resolve the issue for me on Fedora 10. Here is my configure entry: >>> That is another issue, it is fixed by

Re: [Clamav-users] Problems installing 0.95.3

On 2009-10-29 16:33, Bill Landry wrote: > Török Edwin wrote: > >> On 2009-10-29 16:27, Bill Landry wrote: >> >>> That didn't resolve the issue for me on Fedora 10. Here is my configure >>> entry: >>> >>> >>> >> That is another issue, it is fixed by the patch I posted in another t

Re: [Clamav-users] Problems installing 0.95.3

Rick, Thank's for that, it has fixed my install problem. Will you raise the bug report or should I? FAS Rick Cooper wrote: Original Message From: clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net [mailto:clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net] On Behalf Of Francis Stevens Sent: Thursday, October

Re: [Clamav-users] Problems installing 0.95.3

Török Edwin wrote: > On 2009-10-29 16:27, Bill Landry wrote: >> That didn't resolve the issue for me on Fedora 10. Here is my configure >> entry: >> >> > > That is another issue, it is fixed by the patch I posted in another thread. > Here it is again: > http://git.clamav.net/gitweb?p=clamav-de

Re: [Clamav-users] Problems installing 0.95.3

Bill Landry wrote: > Rick Cooper wrote: >> Original Message >> From: clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net >> [mailto:clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net] On Behalf Of Francis Stevens >> Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 6:43 AM To: ClamAV users ML >> Subject: [Clamav-users] Problems insta

Re: [Clamav-users] Problems installing 0.95.3

On 2009-10-29 16:27, Bill Landry wrote: > That didn't resolve the issue for me on Fedora 10. Here is my configure > entry: > > That is another issue, it is fixed by the patch I posted in another thread. Here it is again: http://git.clamav.net/gitweb?p=clamav-devel.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=6238

Re: [Clamav-users] Problems installing 0.95.3

Rick Cooper wrote: > Original Message > From: clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net > [mailto:clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net] On Behalf Of Francis Stevens > Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 6:43 AM To: ClamAV users ML > Subject: [Clamav-users] Problems installing 0.95.3 > >> I'm try

Re: [Clamav-users] Problems installing 0.95.3

On 2009-10-29 15:37, Rick Cooper wrote: > Original Message > From: clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net > [mailto:clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net] On Behalf Of Francis Stevens > Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 6:43 AM To: ClamAV users ML > Subject: [Clamav-users] Problems installing

Re: [Clamav-users] Problems installing 0.95.3

Original Message From: clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net [mailto:clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net] On Behalf Of Francis Stevens Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 6:43 AM To: ClamAV users ML Subject: [Clamav-users] Problems installing 0.95.3 > I'm trying to install 0.95.3 on a RedHa

Re: [Clamav-users] Problems installing 0.95.3

Török Edwin wrote: On 2009-10-29 12:42, Francis Stevens wrote: I'm trying to install 0.95.3 on a RedHat system currently running 0.95.2 and am getting the following error from "make install" Which RedHat version, is it a RHEL? It's an old system based on Redhat 7.2 but with a new kernel an

Re: [Clamav-users] Problems installing 0.95.3

On 2009-10-29 12:42, Francis Stevens wrote: > I'm trying to install 0.95.3 on a RedHat system currently running > 0.95.2 and am getting the following error from "make install" Which RedHat version, is it a RHEL? > > make[4]: Entering directory `/root/email/clamav-0.95.3/libclamav' > test -z "/usr

Re: [Clamav-users] Problems installing 0.95.3

some progress... I have copied the Makefile from libclamav/ for 0.95.2 to replace the Makefile in the same folder for 0.95.3 and the "make install" now works without error, but what I can't be sure of since I messed with the Makefile is that everything is installed properly... FAS Francis S

Re: [Clamav-users] Problems installing 0.95.3

This may be misleading but the corresponding snippet from the "make install" for 0.95.2 is: make[3]: Entering directory `/root/email/clamav-0.95.2/libclamav/lzma' make[4]: Entering directory `/root/email/clamav-0.95.2/libclamav/lzma' make[4]: Nothing to be done for `install-exec-am'. make[4]: No

Re: [Clamav-users] Problems Detecting Known Viruses

> > I just did a fresh install on Postfix, Amavisd-new, & Clamav on > Debian. Now everything works great however I attempted to send a test > virus from my new Postfix install running Clamd to this Gmail account > and I never saw any sign emailed to me that a "virus was detected" > from Clamav. I

Re: [Clamav-users] Problems with upgrade to 0.95.1

aCaB wrote: > Frank Bures wrote: >> May 4 09:13:13 alchemy sendmail[27492]: n44DDBf8027492: Milter (clamav): >> write(L) returned -1, expected 61: Broken pipe >> May 4 09:13:13 alchemy sendmail[27492]: n44DDBf8027492: Milter (clamav): >> to error state >> May 4 09:13:13 alchemy sendmail[27454]:

Re: [Clamav-users] Problems with upgrade to 0.95.1

Frank Bures wrote: > May 4 09:13:13 alchemy sendmail[27492]: n44DDBf8027492: Milter (clamav): > write(L) returned -1, expected 61: Broken pipe > May 4 09:13:13 alchemy sendmail[27492]: n44DDBf8027492: Milter (clamav): > to error state > May 4 09:13:13 alchemy sendmail[27454]: n44DDAda027454: Mil

Re: [Clamav-users] Problems with clamdscan : access denied

On 2009-04-02 17:39, Dale Patterson wrote: > Have discovered the answer. And feel a little sheepish. It turns out that > even though apparmor did not show up in a ps command, apparently clamav can > still make calls to its config file? In any case I got the following > information for the creato

Re: [Clamav-users] Problems with clamdscan : access denied

xcellent clues and hints I've found in the mailing > list archives and on the net in general have solved this problem for me. > > Any ideas? > > Thanks so much. > -- > Dale Patterson > > > -- > > Messa

Re: [Clamav-users] Problems with clamdscan : access denied

On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 14:47, Dale Patterson wrote: > As for using clamscan, the reason I installed clamav is to work with another > piece of software which apparently uses clamdscan in its call. That does, but that doesn't mean that you can *only* use clamdscan. -- Please keep

Re: [Clamav-users] Problems with clamdscan : access denied

As for using clamscan, the reason I installed clamav is to work with another piece of software which apparently uses clamdscan in its call. -- Dale Patterson ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://www.clamav.

  1   2   3   4   5   >