Michael Torrie wrote:
> This is only clam-milter that is affected by the bounce options,
> right? I run clam in standalone mode using mimedefang as the milter
> (with custom handling of virus e-mails). Seems to be much better
> than running just clam-milter. Anyone who is running clamav-milter,
>
On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 18:45 -0500, Damian Menscher wrote:
>
> I would recommend NOT running those RPMs, unless you do heavy
> modification of the configuration. Dag has it set to spam the spoofed
> senders (WHY IS THIS EVEN A VALID OPTION IN CLAMAV?). I emailed him
> about getting a reasonabl
On Wed, 2005-09-28 at 12:40 -0500, Damian Menscher wrote:
> You're right. I was (incorrectly) thinking that --bounce overrides
> --quiet (which would make more sense than the actual behavior, IMHO,
> since having options get ignored seems strange, especially when a
> different behavior that wou
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, in the interest of fairness, here's the list of flags:
%{__cat} RE: [Clamav-users] Issues with ClamAV and RedHat Enterprise 2
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, Damian Menscher wrote:
> > No it does not. Retract that statement immediately.
>
> Oh, sorry. That's what it says in my (patched) version. The released
> version may say something different.
Personally I like your version better. If the option can't be removed, you
should
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, Nigel Horne wrote:
On Wed, 2005-09-28 at 02:13, Damian Menscher wrote:
If you look up --bounce in man
clamav-milter, it says "Send a spam to the spoofed sender. This will
help advertize ClamAV. Note: this may cause you to be referred to as an
`idiot' by clueful mailserve
Matthew van Eerde wrote:
> Damian Menscher wrote:
>> On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dag has it set to spam the spoofed senders
>>>
>>> Um, does he? By my reading of
>>> http://dag.wieers.com/packages/clamav/clamav.spec
>>> ...
>>> --noreject
>>
>> Rather convenient of you
Damian Menscher wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> Dag has it set to spam the spoofed senders
>>
>> Um, does he? By my reading of
>> http://dag.wieers.com/packages/clamav/clamav.spec
>> ...
>> --noreject
>
> Rather convenient of you to snip THE NEXT LINE:
> -obl
On Wed, 2005-09-28 at 02:13, Damian Menscher wrote:
> If you look up --bounce in man
> clamav-milter, it says "Send a spam to the spoofed sender. This will
> help advertize ClamAV. Note: this may cause you to be referred to as an
> `idiot' by clueful mailserver administrators worldwide."
No
Damian Menscher said:
>
> Rather convenient of you to snip THE NEXT LINE:
> -obl local:%{_localstatedir}/clamav/clmilter.socket
>
> Note that the -b is short for --bounce. If you look up --bounce in man
> clamav-milter, it says "Send a spam to the spoofed sender. This will
> help advertize
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Damian Menscher wrote:
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Michael Torrie wrote:
Also Dag Wieers has packages (fairly up-to-date) of clamav for all
the RedHat distros including EL and FC.
See http://dag.wieers.com/home-made/apt/packages.php
I would recommend N
Damian Menscher wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Michael Torrie wrote:
>>
>> Also Dag Wieers has packages (fairly up-to-date) of clamav for all
>> the RedHat distros including EL and FC.
>>
>> See http://dag.wieers.com/home-made/apt/packages.php
>
> I would recommend NOT running those RPMs, unless
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Michael Torrie wrote:
On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 10:31 -0500, David Shows wrote:
Excellent. I'll go ahead and push this through. Thanks for the help.
Also Dag Wieers has packages (fairly up-to-date) of clamav for all the
RedHat distros including EL and FC.
See http://dag.wie
ages.php
>
> David
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James Kosin
> Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2005 10:27 AM
> To: ClamAV users ML
> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Issues with ClamAV and RedHat Enterpris
Excellent. I'll go ahead and push this through. Thanks for the help.
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James Kosin
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2005 10:27 AM
To: ClamAV users ML
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Issues with ClamA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
David Shows wrote:
| Morning all,
|
| My version of ClamAV .85 has become outdated and I need to upgrade.
|Unfortunately I get error messages when I try to use RPM to upgrade
because
|of incompatibilities with zlib packages. I have not tried
16 matches
Mail list logo
