Michael Torrie wrote: > This is only clam-milter that is affected by the bounce options, > right? I run clam in standalone mode using mimedefang as the milter > (with custom handling of virus e-mails). Seems to be much better > than running just clam-milter. Anyone who is running clamav-milter, > I recommend switching to mimedefang. Many more possibilities for > filtering.
I run clamav-milter (to clamd, with --external) first, then MIMEDefang. I figure if I can reject the viral mail with a cheap clamav-milter call, and avoid tying up a memory-hungry MIMEDefang thread unnecessarily, I can use the MIMEDefang thread somewhere else (like running a SpamAssassin check, for example.) I occasionally consider writing a Mail::SpamAssassin::Client module to lighten up the MIMEDefang threads, too... just run a few spamd threads and have the MIMEDefang threads share... -- Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902 Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer _______________________________________________ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
