On Wed, 2005-09-28 at 12:40 -0500, Damian Menscher wrote: > You're right. I was (incorrectly) thinking that --bounce overrides > --quiet (which would make more sense than the actual behavior, IMHO, > since having options get ignored seems strange, especially when a > different behavior that would make sense).
I was worried there for a second, until I realized that I don't use clam-milter. I instead run clamav via the socket from mimedefang, which is a better way to go anyway. > > So, Dag's package doesn't send bounce messages. But it has plenty of > other problems, like running freshclam only daily, not using > DNSDatabaseInfo, not running clamdwatch or clmilter_watch, not logging > through syslog, etc. In fairness, you should always set up your own freshclam stuff anyway so as to spread the updates out. I use dag packages but I set crontab to a pseudo-random minute (pick a number) every hour run freshclam. I am using dag's packages on 3 servers and each hour I get the latest update. > > As I said, I suggested changes to Dag on Aug 14, but they didn't make it > into his .spec file. And, until they do, I'll continue to warn people > away from using his clamav package. Definitely don't run it blindly. I use clamav with mimedefang (all from dag's packages) and have things set up and running without any problems.. > > Damian Menscher -- Michael Torrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
