Yeah . But it still shows the output of all the excluded and empty file.
I do not want that to happen
-Original Message-
From: Brian Read [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 12:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [clamav-users] RE: [users] Report file
See
mscan --exclude=//proc --stdout -r -I /
>
>
>But still it outputs the entire /proc and all its subdirectories.
>
>
>
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Brian Read [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 6:52 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subje
Allright. Thank You so much~
-Original Message-
From: Brian Read [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 6:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [users] Report file
Use the --exclude parameter
B.
At 10:59 16/10/2002, you wrote:
>is
>there a
At 15:21 16/10/2002, you wrote:
> >"Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "
>
>That's not right. Your MTA or MUA is lying to you. The proper
>Return-Path should look like:
>
>Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Well my MTA is qmail, and my MUA is Eudora, i guess it must be Eudora
getting it wrong, or my
Brian Read <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>At 13:30 16/10/2002, you wrote:
>>[Please don't top-post. If you don't know what top-posting is, check
>>Google.]
>
>sorry, a slip of the brain.
No problem.
>The RP on this message is meaningless via a vis the mail list.
>
>"Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Quoting Brian Read <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> At 13:30 16/10/2002, you wrote:
> >No, they suck for filtering messages into different folders for
> >exactly the reason that this thread is taking place: they're not
> >guaranteed to be unique. A much better field to filter upon is
> >Return-Path. If your
At 15:00 16/10/2002, you wrote:
>So my vote goes to (and I have no illusions about this being a democracy, but
>if it were...) dump the subject tag and add a List-ID: header.
My vote as well.
As long as it is unique, my email rules will work...
Cheers
Brian
Brian J Read
www.abandonmicrosoft.co
At 13:30 16/10/2002, you wrote:
>[Please don't top-post. If you don't know what top-posting is, check
>Google.]
sorry, a slip of the brain.
> >Not at all, [subject tags] are ideal to use for email rules to sort
> >into different folders.
>
>No, they suck for filtering messages into different fol
Quoting Brian Read <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Not at all, they are ideal to use for email rules to sort into different
> folders.
No, they are not. As has been pointed out, they are not unique. What _is_
ideal, or would be if every list manager used it, is the List-ID: header.
Failing that, the T
[Please don't top-post. If you don't know what top-posting is, check
Google.]
Brian Read <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Not at all, [subject tags] are ideal to use for email rules to sort
>into different folders.
No, they suck for filtering messages into different folders for
exactly the reason tha
Not at all, they are ideal to use for email rules to sort into different
folders. I get between 50-100 emails a day, and need to prioritise which i
read immediatly, and which I leave until later.
Cheers
Brian
At 12:53 16/10/2002, you wrote:
>Personally, I think subject prefixes are annoying a
Odhiambo Washington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>It's a set-table value, AFAIK. In the two MLMs that I've used so far
>I know it is. I don't know about what these guys user here though;-)
>Looks like their own home-brewed one.
It's ezmlm.
Personally, I think subject prefixes are annoying and a w
Use the --exclude parameter
B.
At 10:59 16/10/2002, you wrote:
>is
>there a way to disable testing on the /proc directory?
Brian J Read
www.abandonmicrosoft.co.uk
www.theonlineorganiser.com
www.thepersonalknowledgebase.com
Mitel SMEserver Contributions and Howtos:
www.abandonmicrosoft.co.uk/aba
Message-
>From: Brian Read [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 4:48 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [users] Report file
>
>
>At 09:14 16/10/2002, you wrote:
> >How do I make the report file to SHOW WHICH files are being infected?
>
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 4:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [users] Report file
At 09:14 16/10/2002, you wrote:
>How do I make the report file to SHOW WHICH files are being infected?
>The option -i -l report.txt does not yield much info. It only sho
* Brian Read <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20021016 13:13]: wrote:
> Yes, my email rules would work much better then. Lots of other mailing
> list also just use [users].
>
> Isn't it just a parameter to the mailing list software?
It's a set-table value, AFAIK. In the two MLMs that I've used so far
I kno
Yes, my email rules would work much better then. Lots of other mailing
list also just use [users].
Isn't it just a parameter to the mailing list software?
cheers
Brian
At 10:02 16/10/2002, you wrote:
>It would be nice to prepend the subject of posts to this list with
>[clamav-users],
>no?
roc comes with some crap.
Cheers`
-Original Message-
From: Brian Read [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 4:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [users] Report file
At 09:14 16/10/2002, you wrote:
>How do I make the report file to SHOW WHICH files are being in
This is a suggestion.
It would be nice to prepend the subject of posts to this list with [clamav-users],
no?
-Wash
--
Odhiambo Washington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "The box said 'Requires
Wananchi Online Ltd. www.wananchi.com Windows 95, NT, or better,'
Tel: +254 2 313985-9 +254 2 313922
At 09:14 16/10/2002, you wrote:
>How do I make the report file to SHOW WHICH files are being infected?
>The option -i -l report.txt does not yield much info. It only shows HOW
>MANY files are infected. But not WHICH files. Can someone throw me a
>bone here?
I think the infected file names goes ou
HI guys, it seems that I have a problem with the report function.
How do I make the report file to SHOW WHICH files are being infected?
The option -i -l report.txt does not yield much info. It only shows HOW
MANY files are infected. But not WHICH files. Can someone throw me a
bone here?
cheers`
21 matches
Mail list logo
