Sorry Sierk, I don’t recall how many there were before, but in checking the
current databases themselves, the numbers match. Main has 145 and daily has
141.
The ClamXav database has over 64,000 “OSX" sigs.
I’d have to guess daily.db, daily.zmd and main.db no longer exist in the new
format.
I
> Am 21.03.2016 um 16:34 schrieb Al Varnell :
>
> Although I’ve been seeing the same thing for since, it doesn’t seem to impact
> the results for me.
For me, it in fact does impact the result page: fewer results.
> What issue is it causing you?
Fewer results in contrast to before the db chang
Although I’ve been seeing the same thing for since, it doesn’t seem to impact
the results for me. What issue is it causing you?
-Al-
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 05:19 AM, Sierk Bornemann wrote:
>
> Since the change to the new main.cvd and daily.cvd, every request on
> http://clamav-du.securesites
Since the change to the new main.cvd and daily.cvd, every request on
http://clamav-du.securesites.net/cgi-bin/clamgrok stops, independently of the
search term, with this error messages at the end of the search result page:
Couldn't read cache file 'daily.db' in
/home/clamavdb/www/database.clama
Sure - thanks for the reply.
Robin
-Original Message-
From: clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net
[mailto:clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net] On Behalf Of Alain
Zidouemba
Sent: 13 February 2013 14:36
To: ClamAV users ML
Subject: Re: [clamav-users] Bug report submitted - do I need to
Yes, please. If you set up yourself to be notified when an update is
posted to the bug, you will receive and email when that happens. All
incoming bug reports are looked at within a reasonable amount of time.
Thanks,
- Alain
___
Help us build a comprehe
Hello,
Apologies if this is the wrong forum, but I submitted a bug report to
the bugzilla website, #6801. Should I just be patient?
Thanks, Robin
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://www.clamav.net/support
Tom,
Thanks for your email. Let me talk with the team and see what we can do about
fixing these response issues.
--
Joel Esler
Senior Research Engineer, VRT
OpenSource Community Manager
Sourcefire
On Oct 26, 2012, at 8:20 PM, TR Shaw wrote:
> I don't mind if SourceFire decides they don't like
On Fri, 26 Oct 2012 20:20:24 -0400
TR Shaw articulated:
> I don't mind if SourceFire decides they don't like my proposals or
> problem sets. But I do think it shows poor stewardship of clamav when
> on bugzilla and on mail lists there is not a peep of a response from
> SourceFire after 90 days. Ei
I don't mind if SourceFire decides they don't like my proposals or problem
sets. But I do think it shows poor stewardship of clamav when on bugzilla and
on mail lists there is not a peep of a response from SourceFire after 90 days.
Either yea or nay. Its like they are ignoring bugzilla entries.
My OS is OpenSuSE with kernel 2.6.34.
I got the CVE-2010-0405 error in ClamAV 0.97 compilation and tried to
upgrade bunzip2 to version 1.06 (via RPM) but the error is still exist.
My running ClamAV is 0.96
What is the other component that I missed to upgrade? Your advise is
very appreciated
Ch
On 2011-03-10 09:59, Wong wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> My apologize to post this message.
>
> My OS is OpenSuSE with kernel 2.6.34.
>
> I got the CVE-2010-0405 error in ClamAV 0.97 compilation and tried to
> upgrade bunzip2 to version 1.06 (via RPM) but the error is still exist.
> My running ClamAV is
Dear all,
My apologize to post this message.
My OS is OpenSuSE with kernel 2.6.34.
I got the CVE-2010-0405 error in ClamAV 0.97 compilation and tried to
upgrade bunzip2 to version 1.06 (via RPM) but the error is still exist. My
running ClamAV is 0.96
What is the other component that I misse
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Dennis Peterson wrote:
[snip]
> I saw a huge number of warnings building it with Studio 11 on Sol10-x86,
> but nothing unusual building with gcc on Sol8 64-bit Sparc with GCC 3.3.2.
The warnings are there in Solaris 9, gcc 3.3.2, regular build (32
René Berber wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Hi,
>
> While building clamav-0.90.2 I saw these messages:
>
> unrar/unrar.c: In function `cli_unrar_extract_next_prepare':
> unrar/unrar.c:1549: warning: integer constant is too large for "long" type
> unrar/unrar.c:1550
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
While building clamav-0.90.2 I saw these messages:
unrar/unrar.c: In function `cli_unrar_extract_next_prepare':
unrar/unrar.c:1549: warning: integer constant is too large for "long" type
unrar/unrar.c:1550: warning: integer constant is too larg
Hello,
the ones among you that subscribed to this mailing list long time ago
will find hard to believe this: finally we have bug tracker!
Please use it wisely: https://bugs.clamav.net
Thanks,
--
Luca Gibelli (luca _at_ clamav.net) - ClamAV, a GPL anti-virus toolkit
[Tel] +44 2081239239 [Fax]
Thanks guys, sorry for false alarm!
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
Daniel T. Staal wrote:
On Thu, June 15, 2006 11:13 am, Kevin Lowe said:
Hi,
I accidentally issued the following command where I mis-spelled remove:
$ ./clamscan --remov /usr/home/projects/virus/
And it actually removed the file. I would expect either an error or the
flag to be ignored. Is thi
On Thu, June 15, 2006 11:13 am, Kevin Lowe said:
> Hi,
>
> I accidentally issued the following command where I mis-spelled remove:
>
> $ ./clamscan --remov /usr/home/projects/virus/
>
> And it actually removed the file. I would expect either an error or the
> flag to be ignored. Is this a (minor) b
Hi,
I accidentally issued the following command where I mis-spelled remove:
$ ./clamscan --remov /usr/home/projects/virus/
And it actually removed the file. I would expect either an error or the flag
to be ignored. Is this a (minor) bug I shoud report?
ClamAV 0.88.2 running on FreeBSD
Kevin
Jim Maul said:
> Dennis Peterson wrote:
>> Dave Shariff Yadallee - System Administrator a.k.a. The Root of the
>> Problem said:
>>
>>>Looks like since Clamav 0.84, clamav-milter is crashing every time
>>>fleshclam get new definitions. I am running clamav on BSD/OS 4.3.1
>>
>>
>> It's probably tryi
Dennis Peterson wrote:
Dave Shariff Yadallee - System Administrator a.k.a. The Root of the
Problem said:
Looks like since Clamav 0.84, clamav-milter is crashing every time
fleshclam get new definitions. I am running clamav on BSD/OS 4.3.1
It's probably trying to tell you your From: address
Dave Shariff Yadallee - System Administrator a.k.a. The Root of the
Problem said:
> Looks like since Clamav 0.84, clamav-milter is crashing every time
> fleshclam get new definitions. I am running clamav on BSD/OS 4.3.1
It's probably trying to tell you your From: address is too long, eh.
dp
___
Looks like since Clamav 0.84, clamav-milter is crashing every time
fleshclam get new definitions. I am running clamav on BSD/OS 4.3.1
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
On Wed, 08 Dec 2004 13:25:51 +1300
Jason Haar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi there
>
> I have a viral *.jar file that clamscan and clamdscan cannot find
> anything wrong with, but if I run "clamscan --jar file.jar", it finds
> the trojans.
>
> JAR files are meant to be ZIP files, but if I man
Hi there
I have a viral *.jar file that clamscan and clamdscan cannot find
anything wrong with, but if I run "clamscan --jar file.jar", it finds
the trojans.
JAR files are meant to be ZIP files, but if I manually run unzip over it
I see:
Archive: loaderadv50.jar
warning [loaderadv50.jar]: 26
On Mon, 2004-10-18 at 03:27 +0200, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> I'm almost sure you're still running the old instance of clamd.
> Restarting it should solve the problem.
Sheesh - do I feel STUPID :-)
Thanks. The two examples I had that caused this problem are now exit
status zero - so I'm happy.
Tha
On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 14:23:59 +1300
Jason Haar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-10-18 at 03:09 +0200, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> >
> > Oh, no. It's working just fine:
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp$ clamscan partial-1.eml
> > LibClamAV Warning: Partial message received from MUA/MTA - message
On Mon, 2004-10-18 at 03:09 +0200, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
>
> Oh, no. It's working just fine:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp$ clamscan partial-1.eml
> LibClamAV Warning: Partial message received from MUA/MTA - message
> cannot be scanned
> LibClamAV Warning: Descriptor[3]: Bad format or broken data
> pa
On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 03:07:13 +0200
Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 10:25:37 +1300
> Jason Haar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Whoops. Bad form, should have checked the code before sending.
> >
> > I'm afraid your patch is in 0.80 - but isn't working:
> >
> >
> >
On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 10:25:37 +1300
Jason Haar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Whoops. Bad form, should have checked the code before sending.
>
> I'm afraid your patch is in 0.80 - but isn't working:
>
>
> Find attached a partial that triggers the error.
Too late...
--
oo. Tom
Whoops. Bad form, should have checked the code before sending.
I'm afraid your patch is in 0.80 - but isn't working:
Find attached a partial that triggers the error.
bash$ clamdscan -V
ClamAV 0.80/533/Sun Oct 17 14:09:44 2004
bash$ clamdscan Test_Emails//partial-1.eml
partial-1.eml: Bad forma
On Fri, Oct 15, 2004 at 02:06:54AM +0200, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Oct 2004 12:03:51 +1300
> Jason Haar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I've got a message being unable to be delivered via Qmail-Scanner
> > because clamdscan is reporting "Bad format or broken data ERROR" when
> > processing
On Fri, 15 Oct 2004 07:51:00 +0100
Brian Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Oct 2004 02:06:54 +0200 in
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 15 Oct 2004 12:03:51 +1300
> > Jason Haar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > I've got a message being
On Fri, 15 Oct 2004 02:06:54 +0200 in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Oct 2004 12:03:51 +1300
> Jason Haar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I've got a message being unable to be delivered via Qmail-Scanner
> > because clamdscan is reporting "Bad format or bro
On Fri, 15 Oct 2004 12:03:51 +1300
Jason Haar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've got a message being unable to be delivered via Qmail-Scanner
> because clamdscan is reporting "Bad format or broken data ERROR" when
> processing the message.
Patch attached (also applied in CVS).
--
oo.
I've got a message being unable to be delivered via Qmail-Scanner because
clamdscan is reporting "Bad format or broken data ERROR" when processing the
message.
It is part 12 of a 12 part message/partial message... It appears to be a
legit mail containing a whole bunch of GIF files (I'm going to gu
On Fri, 2004-09-24 at 18:30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Yes but I retract my opinion that this is a problem. kill `cat clamav-milter.pid`
> wasn't working, and I wrongly blamed this on the newline.
> It turned out after experiment that kill $PID wasn't working either.
> But killall clamav-milter
On Sep 24, 2004, at 16:30, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Doug Hardie wrote:
On Sep 24, 2004, at 13:48, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Matthew.van.Eerde wrote:
There seems to be a problem with clamav-milter's --pidfile option.
I retract this. The --pidfile option is fine.
Line 1408 of clamav-milter.c has
Doug Hardie wrote:
> On Sep 24, 2004, at 13:48, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Matthew.van.Eerde wrote:
>>> There seems to be a problem with clamav-milter's --pidfile option.
>>
>> I retract this. The --pidfile option is fine.
>
>
> Line 1408 of clamav-milter.c has
>
>
On Sep 24, 2004, at 13:48, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Matthew.van.Eerde wrote:
There seems to be a problem with clamav-milter's --pidfile option.
I retract this. The --pidfile option is fine.
Line 1408 of clamav-milter.c has
fprintf(fd, "%d\n", (int)getpid());
whic
Matthew.van.Eerde wrote:
> There seems to be a problem with clamav-milter's --pidfile option.
I retract this. The --pidfile option is fine.
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170
Project Admins to receive an App
There seems to be a problem with clamav-milter's --pidfile option.
It successfully writes the PID to the file but then it also puts a trailing newline.
This makes it unsuitable for the standard
kill `cat /the/pidfile`
trick.
As a workaround this seems to work:
kill `head --bytes=-1 /the/pidfil
Rob Mangiafico wrote:
+peer_size = sizeof(peer);
+if(getpeername(sockd, (struct sockaddr *) &peer, &peer_size) < 0) {
+ perror("getpeername()");
+ mprintf("@Can't get socket peer name.\n");
+ return -1;
+}
+
+server.sin_addr.s_addr = peer.sin_addr.s_addr;
+
Comment
> > +peer_size = sizeof(peer);
> > +if(getpeername(sockd, (struct sockaddr *) &peer, &peer_size) < 0) {
> > + perror("getpeername()");
> > + mprintf("@Can't get socket peer name.\n");
> > + return -1;
> > +}
> > +
> > +server.sin_addr.s_addr = peer.sin_addr.s_addr;
On Fri, 23 Jul 2004, Paul Bijnens wrote:
> +peer_size = sizeof(peer);
> +if(getpeername(sockd, (struct sockaddr *) &peer, &peer_size) < 0) {
> + perror("getpeername()");
> + mprintf("@Can't get socket peer name.\n");
> + return -1;
> +}
> +
> +server.sin_addr.s_ad
In clamdscan/client.c this was changed in 0.75:
@@ -129,6 +131,15 @@
server.sin_family = AF_INET;
server.sin_port = htons(port);
+peer_size = sizeof(peer);
+if(getpeername(sockd, (struct sockaddr *) &peer, &peer_size) < 0) {
+ perror("getpeername()");
+ mprintf("@Can'
Tomasz Kojm wrote:
On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 14:04:23 -0600
Dan Egli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Phil Ershler wrote:
It was when I composed this message. I just couldn't get connected
to a network until this morning. I was really quite serious. If you
want to make a contribution, contact the the Clamav t
On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 14:04:23 -0600
Dan Egli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Phil Ershler wrote:
> > It was when I composed this message. I just couldn't get connected
> > to a network until this morning. I was really quite serious. If you
> > want to make a contribution, contact the the Clamav team.
Dan Egli wrote:
Phil Ershler wrote:
It was when I composed this message. I just couldn't get connected to
a network until this morning. I was really quite serious. If you want
to make a contribution, contact the the Clamav team.
Phil
I would if I could code in C. I cann't do C to save my life.
Phil Ershler wrote:
It was when I composed this message. I just couldn't get connected to a
network until this morning. I was really quite serious. If you want to
make a contribution, contact the the Clamav team.
Phil
I would if I could code in C. I cann't do C to save my life. It has
always be
It was when I composed this message. I just couldn't get connected to a
network until this morning. I was really quite serious. If you want to
make a contribution, contact the the Clamav team.
Phil
On Jun 21, 2004, at 1:35 PM, Dan Egli wrote:
Philip Ershler wrote:
If you don't like the software,
Philip Ershler wrote:
If you don't like the software, and are unhappy about how much you paid
for it, contact the Clamav team and ask for a job.
Just my 2 cents.
Phil
First, it was just a suggestion!
Second, Fix your clock! It's not 11 pm Sunday!
--
-- Dan
---
If you don't like the software, and are unhappy about how much you paid
for it, contact the Clamav team and ask for a job.
Just my 2 cents.
Phil
On Jun 20, 2004, at 10:25 PM, Dan Egli wrote:
Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
Dan Egli wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# clamdscan $PWD
/root: Can't access the fi
> >>
> > ERROR is not a file name :)
> > It's the scanning result : ERROR, which is not OK.
> >
>
> so redo the message. It looks like a file name.
>
> change /root: Can't access the file ERROR
> to
> ERROR: cannot access the file /root
>
> Simple!
>
> Or even:
>
> scanning /root: Can't ac
Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
Dan Egli wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# clamdscan $PWD
/root: Can't access the file ERROR
Ok, clamd was running as clamav (I never know what daemons maintain
the 0 uid and which ones call set_uid()). But my above question
stands. Where is this ERROR file coming from?
E
Dan Egli wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# clamdscan $PWD
/root: Can't access the file ERROR
Ok, clamd was running as clamav (I never know what daemons maintain
the 0 uid and which ones call set_uid()). But my above question
stands. Where is this ERROR file coming from?
ERROR is not a file name
Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
On Saturday 19 June 2004 12:14 pm, Dan Egli wrote:
but I cannot scan a DIR either.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# clamdscan $PWD
/root: Can't access the file ERROR
$5 says your clamd is not running as root. therefore, it doesn't (hopefully)
have access to read root's home direct
On Saturday 19 June 2004 12:14 pm, Dan Egli wrote:
> but I cannot scan a DIR either.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# clamdscan $PWD
> /root: Can't access the file ERROR
$5 says your clamd is not running as root. therefore, it doesn't (hopefully)
have access to read root's home directory.
-Jeremy
Steven Stern wrote:
On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 10:42:26 -0600, Dan Egli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
But Mr. Stern was
saying Working-As-Designed and I'm just saying Working-As-Designed makes
no sense. If it's a bug then ok, it's a bug. I can understand that and
forgive quite easily.
"As designed" may
On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 10:42:26 -0600, Dan Egli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> But Mr. Stern was
>saying Working-As-Designed and I'm just saying Working-As-Designed makes
>no sense. If it's a bug then ok, it's a bug. I can understand that and
>forgive quite easily.
"As designed" may not be the way
Jeff Smelser wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 19 June 2004 12:14 pm, Dan Egli wrote:
Can someone kindly explain why on earth you would write a scanner that
only scans ONE FILE? The whole point of clamdscan is it's supposed to be
faster than clamscan because it let's
## Steven Stern ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> The same thing happens in 0.73. Reading the man page, it seems that it is a
> WAD.
> clamdscan [options] [file/directory]
> clamdscan scans one file or one directory tree
> clamscan works on multiple files.
Have a look at the source :)
- clamav-0.73/clamsca
On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 11:14:35AM -0600, Dan Egli said:
> but I cannot scan a DIR either.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# clamdscan $PWD
> /root: Can't access the file ERROR
>
> --- SCAN SUMMARY ---
> Infected files: 0
> Time: 0.001 sec (0 m 0 s)
>
>
> Can someone kindly explain w
Dan Egli wrote:
Steven Stern wrote:
On Sat, 19 Jun 2004 10:09:48 -0600, Dan Egli
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I've encountered this bug a few times:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] test]# touch file1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] test]# touch file2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] test]# touch file3
[EMAIL PROTECTED] test]# ls
file1 fil
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 19 June 2004 12:14 pm, Dan Egli wrote:
> Can someone kindly explain why on earth you would write a scanner that
> only scans ONE FILE? The whole point of clamdscan is it's supposed to be
> faster than clamscan because it let's the daemon d
Steven Stern wrote:
On Sat, 19 Jun 2004 10:09:48 -0600, Dan Egli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I've encountered this bug a few times:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] test]# touch file1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] test]# touch file2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] test]# touch file3
[EMAIL PROTECTED] test]# ls
file1 file2 file3
[EMAIL P
On Sat, 19 Jun 2004 10:09:48 -0600, Dan Egli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>I've encountered this bug a few times:
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] test]# touch file1
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] test]# touch file2
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] test]# touch file3
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] test]# ls
>file1 file2 file3
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] t
I've encountered this bug a few times:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] test]# touch file1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] test]# touch file2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] test]# touch file3
[EMAIL PROTECTED] test]# ls
file1 file2 file3
[EMAIL PROTECTED] test]# clamdscan file1 file2 file3
ERROR: Can't access file file1 file2 file3
fi
Version 0.72 seems to have a typo in the routine that does logging for
clamav-milter:
Jun 5 17:47:04 ciscy sendmail[28711]: i55Ml3ll028711: Milter add: header:
X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.72, clamav-milter version 0.72\n\ton
ciscy.sterndata.com
It appears that the newline and tab a
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 03:12:37AM -0500, Damian Menscher wrote:
> I'm running clamav-0.70.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] tmp]# ln -s eicar.txt eicar.lnk
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] tmp]# clamscan eicar.???
> eicar.lnk: Eicar-Test-Signature FOUND
> eicar.txt: Eicar-Test-Signature FOUND
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] tmp]
I'm running clamav-0.70.
(command below obfuscated to bypass virus filters)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] tmp]# echo '[EMAIL PROTECTED](P^)7CC)7}$EICAR-STAN'\
'DARD-ANTIVIRUS-TEST-FILE!$H+H*' > eicar.txt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] tmp]# ln -s eicar.txt eicar.lnk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] tmp]# clamscan eicar.???
eicar.lnk
I'm running clamav-0.70.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] tmp]# echo '[EMAIL
PROTECTED](P^)7CC)7}$EICAR-STANDARD-ANTIVIRUS-TEST-FILE!$H+H*' > eicar.txt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] tmp]# ln -s eicar.txt eicar.lnk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] tmp]# clamscan eicar.???
eicar.lnk: Eicar-Test-Signature FOUND
eicar.txt: Eicar-Test-Signatu
On Wed, 26 May 2004 02:06:45 +1200
Jason Haar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've just tried running clamdscan and clamscan over 42.zip (with
> archive limits enabled) and it doesn't exit in any decent time (i.e.
> it's still running 15 minutes later at 99% CPU).
>
> e.g
>
> clamscan -v --debug --
I've just tried running clamdscan and clamscan over 42.zip (with archive
limits enabled) and it doesn't exit in any decent time (i.e. it's still
running 15 minutes later at 99% CPU).
e.g
clamscan -v --debug --max-files=100 --max-recursion=4 42.zip
The strange thing is it reports things like:
Lib
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 21:55:58 +0700
"Andrey V. Malyshev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello!
>
> 1)
> clamav-devel-20040127: clamd crashes without any log records when
> virus bases reloading command sent.
> It appears _only_ when UseProcesses in clamav.conf is enable.
UseProcesses is completely
Hello!
1)
clamav-devel-20040127: clamd crashes without any log records when virus
bases reloading command sent.
It appears only when UseProcesses in clamav.conf is enable.
Steps to reproduce:
- start clamd
- erase daily.cvd
- start freshclam with "daemon-notify"
===
Debug log:
LibClamAV debu
Hello!
1)
clamav-devel-20040127: clamd crashes without any log records when virus
bases reloading command sent.
It appears _only_ when UseProcesses in clamav.conf is enable.
Steps to reproduce:
- start clamd
- erase daily.cvd
- start freshclam with "daemon-notify"
===
Debug log:
LibClamAV de
On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 16:49:57 +1300
Jason Haar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Jason,
I will check it ASAP. Thank you for your great work on Qmail-Scanner !
Best regards,
Tomasz Kojm
--
oo. [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.ClamAV.net
(\/)\. http://www.clamav.net/g
Hi there
I am running clamd under daemontools, with softlimit to limit the amount
of memory clamd can grow to.
I upgraded to 0.65 from a (much) older release, and ran into all sorts
of problems. Basically it would run fine for a while, and then clamd
would die in such a fashion that it was still
Tobias Rice wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sorry if this posts twice!
Not sure if this has been reported yet, but while trying to compile on
RH9 (./configure --sysconfdir=/etc --enable-milter) the operation fails:
Hi Tobias,
if you not sure about some problem was reported
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sorry if this posts twice!
Not sure if this has been reported yet, but while trying to compile on
RH9 (./configure --sysconfdir=/etc --enable-milter) the operation fails:
make[1]: *** No rule to make target `../docs/clamav-milter.8', needed by
`all-am'
Found a bug in today's snapshot of clamav-milter. The following patch
fixes.
--- clamav-milter.c.orig2003-10-03 11:25:03.0 -0600
+++ clamav-milter.c 2003-10-03 11:17:31.0 -0600
@@ -483,7 +483,7 @@
* is set in the config file
*/
if((max_children
Hi,
I'm not sure if this is solved in a newer development
version, so these instructions are mostly for those
like me trying to figure out how to get this compile
to work.
First, upgrade to the latest compiler, etc, using the
Cygwin installer. For reference, I used cygwin
1.5.4-1, gcc 3.2-3, mak
85 matches
Mail list logo
