-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday 19 June 2004 12:14 pm, Dan Egli wrote:
> Can someone kindly explain why on earth you would write a scanner that > only scans ONE FILE? The whole point of clamdscan is it's supposed to be > faster than clamscan because it let's the daemon do the scanning, and it > just acts as an interface. Doesn't make much sense to then cripple it by > only working on one file at a time. Slow down. Its has to be a bug. Its worked here several times in the past. I take it you never wrote code with bugs in it? Jeff - -- ======================================================================= Jabber: tradergt@(smelser.org|jabber.org) Quote: What would the BOFH do? ======================================================================= -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFA1HfEld4MRA3gEwYRAjXoAKCFQG/v4xEgeS+5KZfGlSShJfawZwCgguvk NGmzteF+GX+HyNddvm8+NFs= =iRkq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by The 2004 JavaOne(SM) Conference Learn from the experts at JavaOne(SM), Sun's Worldwide Java Developer Conference, June 28 - July 1 at the Moscone Center in San Francisco, CA REGISTER AND SAVE! http://java.sun.com/javaone/sf Priority Code NWMGYKND _______________________________________________ Clamav-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users
