> > + peer_size = sizeof(peer);
> > + if(getpeername(sockd, (struct sockaddr *) &peer, &peer_size) < 0) {
> > + perror("getpeername()");
> > + mprintf("@Can't get socket peer name.\n");
> > + return -1;
> > + }
> > +
> > + server.sin_addr.s_addr = peer.sin_addr.s_addr;
> > +
>
> Commenting out the new code (with + in front) seems to at least get things
> working on my system.
Anyone else see any drawbacks to commenting this out in 0.75 to get things
working with Unix Sockets support for the time being? Want to upgrade to
0.75 for the increased virus catching of certain viruses.
Rob M.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click
_______________________________________________
Clamav-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users
