Re: [Clamav-users] devel-0908 terminally broken?

2003-09-09 Thread Marian Eichholz
--- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > ___ > Clamav-users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users

[Clamav-users] devel-0908 terminally broken?

2003-09-09 Thread Marian Eichholz
Hi! A test deploy of development release 09/08 was unfortunately no success at all. In fact the Exim/Exiscan (4.22) cannot connect to the clamd-socket any longer (the connect() blocks). So we had to shut down virus prevention, since the old releases are proven to be instable, too, and we cannot

[Clamav-users] clamav-20030829 dies defunct, too

2003-09-09 Thread Marian Eichholz
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 10:11:41AM +0200, Marian Eichholz wrote: > > I had to downgrade to the clamav-20030829.tar.gz which apparently is > > stable on my FreeBSD 4.8. I also use exim-4.22/exiscan. Hmm... Our upgrade to 20030829 still shows the well known issue with a dying cl

Re: [Clamav-users] clamd proposal and question

2003-09-05 Thread Marian Eichholz
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 06:18:01PM +0300, ODHIAMBO Washington wrote: > In my case, it's the clamav-20030829.tar.gz that was dying so ofetn. Ups, seems to be our most recent version, too... > I had to downgrade to the clamav-20030829.tar.gz which apparently is > stable on my FreeBSD 4.8. I also u

[Clamav-users] new clamd and the zombie issue

2003-09-05 Thread Marian Eichholz
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 03:02:57PM +0200, Marian Eichholz wrote: > Well, we have about 4 Mio mails/day on 6 machines, one being under > Sobig.F-fire (560 worms/minute). > > In this situation clamd was *really* instable, breaking nearly daily (exim > 4.22/exiscan/michael&

Re: [Clamav-users] clamd dieing

2003-09-04 Thread Marian Eichholz
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 06:01:45PM +0200, Tomasz Papszun wrote: > > >I'm not sure of the status for clamav-milter, but IIRC it's clamd > dying in most cases, due to problems in the mbox.c code. ALl my clamd > problems went away after I disabled the "ScanMail" option in > clamav.conf. Cannot prove

Re: [Clamav-users] clamd proposal and question

2003-09-04 Thread Marian Eichholz
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 09:28:08AM +0200, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: > >I have been running clamd 0.60 for quite some time now on our mail > >gateway in a milter setup (not the ClamAV milter, but our own one that > >"speaks" the clamd protocol). > > > >clamd in this version is not stable and I wo

[Clamav-users] Re: clamd [defunct]

2003-08-27 Thread Marian Eichholz
systems, not being exploitable(?) itself. So, which version *is* stable? You know: - not leaking threads - not leaking memory - not leaking zombies - not segfaulting... - reliably restartable. You want to know when You start to scan some million emails