(Dennis Peterson)++
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 8:29 PM, Dennis Peterson wrote:
> On 11/27/12 2:19 PM, Nigel Houghton wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Nov 27, 2012, at 2:17 PM, Dennis Peterson wrote:
>>
>>> I was hoping to hear from someone higher up than a mentalist time lord.
>>
>>
>> Well, if Rassilon wasn't i
On 11/27/12 2:19 PM, Nigel Houghton wrote:
On Nov 27, 2012, at 2:17 PM, Dennis Peterson wrote:
I was hoping to hear from someone higher up than a mentalist time lord.
Well, if Rassilon wasn't in a time lock he might reply, but since he is, I'm it.
It would have helped quite a lot if you h
On Nov 27, 2012, at 2:17 PM, Dennis Peterson wrote:
> I was hoping to hear from someone higher up than a mentalist time lord.
Well, if Rassilon wasn't in a time lock he might reply, but since he is, I'm it.
--
Nigel Houghton
Head Mentalist, Time Lord, Demi-God
SF VRT Department of Intelligence
There's not much I can add to what Nigel already said. But obviously there is
some confusion about what the Commercial ClamAV End of Life means, and I wanted
to correct a few things.
We are no longer selling a commercially supported certified version of ClamAV.
Meaning, you can't call Sourcef
I was hoping to hear from someone higher up than a mentalist time lord.
On 11/27/12 10:11 AM, Nigel Houghton wrote:
On Nov 27, 2012, at 12:32 PM, Dennis Peterson wrote:
Can we get a link to a SourceFire statement on the future of ClamAV? I just
rolled it out to a very large enterprise and t
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 8:25 PM, Al Varnell wrote:
> On 11/26/12 9:02 AM, "polloxx" wrote:
>
>> Are signatures for Belgian or Dutch bank-phishing mails (ING,
>> BNP-Paribas-Fortis, Belfius, etc) included in these databases?
>>
> Open the "daily" portion of your database with a text editor and in
On Nov 27, 2012, at 1:20 PM, TR Shaw wrote:
>
> On Nov 27, 2012, at 1:11 PM, Nigel Houghton wrote:
>
>>
>> On Nov 27, 2012, at 12:32 PM, Dennis Peterson wrote:
>>
>>> Can we get a link to a SourceFire statement on the future of ClamAV? I just
>>> rolled it out to a very large enterprise an
On Nov 27, 2012, at 1:11 PM, Nigel Houghton wrote:
>
> On Nov 27, 2012, at 12:32 PM, Dennis Peterson wrote:
>
>> Can we get a link to a SourceFire statement on the future of ClamAV? I just
>> rolled it out to a very large enterprise and they won't be happy if this
>> thing is going under or
On Nov 27, 2012, at 12:32 PM, Dennis Peterson wrote:
> Can we get a link to a SourceFire statement on the future of ClamAV? I just
> rolled it out to a very large enterprise and they won't be happy if this
> thing is going under or even looks like it is sputtering. The timing of this
> can't
Can we get a link to a SourceFire statement on the future of ClamAV? I just
rolled it out to a very large enterprise and they won't be happy if this thing
is going under or even looks like it is sputtering. The timing of this can't
have been worse so getting out ahead of the rumors is in everyon
OK, there is a bit of a translation error here. We are no longer
selling commercial support for deployments of ClamAV. We do of course
continue to produce signatures that are available to all users of
ClamAV.
Robin, can you email me privately the name of your sales manager so I
can get in touch
ClamAV is still getting and will continue to get official signatures via
freshclam.
--
--
Alain Zidouemba
Vulnerability Research Team
SOURCEfire
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://www.clamav.net/support/m
Steve Basford skrev den 26-11-2012 15:12:
http://sanesecurity.co.uk/fps.htm
thanks, this is verbosely explained there
is sanesecurity.ftm resolved with daily.ftm now ?, last time i checked
it looked like there was dupes, so now i dont use it anymore
__
Hi,
Our regional SourceFire sales manager has made the following statement:
I can confirm as discussed that the product (ClamAV) is now
officially no longer supported as a product and therefore you will no
longer receive signatures.
Can anyone clarify what this means in terms of contin
14 matches
Mail list logo
