On Thu, 21 Aug 2008, Michael Grant wrote:
> Before automating something to post thousands of viruses to that web
> page, you might want to warn a real human first.
Begging pardon, but exactly how is it that this one person has
hundreds (?) of viruses that have not been detected anywhere else?
If
Hi Michael,
I am very sorry that I don't know how to program perl language,so I don't know
how to do it.Can you help me or offer an other way to do that?
And I would post files irregularly,maybe somtimes only several,and other times
have a large amount.It is sure that during weekends or holidays
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 12:34 PM, Aron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi there,
> I have about 500MB virus now, but I haven't finnished detecting the virus to
> see which clamav cannot realize.And I am starting a small project to collect
> virus and commit them to some antivirus software.As for Cla
On Thu, 21 Aug 2008, Henrik K wrote:
> Who cares if it scans 100ms or 20ms. I prefer features and stability more
For those of us who use it as an incoming mail scanner (which I seem to
recall being the primary focus of clam from statements on this list) it
matters a great deal. The rate of scan
I see it running- but no mail can get through-
i unistalled clamav- i made clean
did make install clean
Freebsd 6
Exim 4.69
Clamav .93.3
Jean-Paul Natola
_
Get ideas on sharing photos from people l
Hi there,
I have about 500MB virus now, but I haven't finnished detecting the virus to
see which clamav cannot realize.And I am starting a small project to collect
virus and commit them to some antivirus software.As for ClamAV,it cannot
discover many virus from China and I would like to help cla
On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 08:37:19 +0300
Henrik K <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I don't care what the method would be. Be innovative. Create a safe method.
> :)
No need to reinvent the wheel, such a technology has been already invented -
it's name is apt-get & Co. Rewriting the zip code and other mod
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 09:24:29AM CEST, Henrik K <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Who cares if it scans 100ms or 20ms. I prefer features and stability more
> (which ClamAV might or might not have yet). Are you a talented coder or what
> makes you think that such thing as "pseudo-binary" (I invented the
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 10:24:29AM +0300, Henrik K wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 08:52:30AM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > > > On 2008-08-20 17:31, Henrik K wrote:
> > > > > I guess they are some sort of pseudo-binary-code or whatever. I'd like
> > > > > to see ClamAV u
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 08:52:30AM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > > On 2008-08-20 17:31, Henrik K wrote:
> > > > I guess they are some sort of pseudo-binary-code or whatever. I'd like
> > > > to see ClamAV use this kind of technology.
>
> pseudo-binary code would slow down cl
10 matches
Mail list logo
