On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 10:24:29AM +0300, Henrik K wrote: > On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 08:52:30AM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > > Hello, > > > > > > On 2008-08-20 17:31, Henrik K wrote: > > > > > I guess they are some sort of pseudo-binary-code or whatever. I'd like > > > > > to see ClamAV use this kind of technology. > > > > pseudo-binary code would slow down clamav. Clamav is already slower than > > e.g. drweb, at least on out systems. Do you want to have slow antivirus? I > > don't. > > Who cares if it scans 100ms or 20ms. I prefer features and stability more > (which ClamAV might or might not have yet). Are you a talented coder or what > makes you think that such thing as "pseudo-binary" (I invented the word, I > don't know if it even means anything) would slow down things if properly > designed?
You could even use something like http://bellard.org/tcc/ to compile the module code on the fly.. I don't know if it's worth continuing this anymore, the idea is out there. But I changed the subject if you want to discuss. _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
