On Tue, 27 Sep 2005 at 16:50:51 -0400, Bill Baird wrote:
> Hello All!
>
> I'm looking for a log analyzer for my clamd.log file. From the
clamav.net 3rd party software page, only one project seems like it will
work for me, that being "Scan Log Analyzer"(link below), but I tested it
and it doesn't
On 28/09/05, doei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My Mail Server used Fedora+qmail+qmailscan+clamav,
> but when i want to upgrade they still error, how to
> fix my libcurl.2, because i can't upgrade my mail
> server ??? I'm tired and boring cause can't upgrade my
> clamav, why???
Because you're using
My Mail Server used Fedora+qmail+qmailscan+clamav,
but when i want to upgrade they still error, how to
fix my libcurl.2, because i can't upgrade my mail
server ??? I'm tired and boring cause can't upgrade my
clamav, why???
[EMAIL PROTECTED] clamav]# ls -al /usr/lib/libcurl*
-rw-r--r-- 1 root ro
Damian Menscher said:
>
> Rather convenient of you to snip THE NEXT LINE:
> -obl local:%{_localstatedir}/clamav/clmilter.socket
>
> Note that the -b is short for --bounce. If you look up --bounce in man
> clamav-milter, it says "Send a spam to the spoofed sender. This will
> help advertize
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Damian Menscher wrote:
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Michael Torrie wrote:
Also Dag Wieers has packages (fairly up-to-date) of clamav for all
the RedHat distros including EL and FC.
See http://dag.wieers.com/home-made/apt/packages.php
I would recommend N
Damian Menscher wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Michael Torrie wrote:
>>
>> Also Dag Wieers has packages (fairly up-to-date) of clamav for all
>> the RedHat distros including EL and FC.
>>
>> See http://dag.wieers.com/home-made/apt/packages.php
>
> I would recommend NOT running those RPMs, unless
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Michael Torrie wrote:
On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 10:31 -0500, David Shows wrote:
Excellent. I'll go ahead and push this through. Thanks for the help.
Also Dag Wieers has packages (fairly up-to-date) of clamav for all the
RedHat distros including EL and FC.
See http://dag.wie
Hello All!
I'm looking for a log analyzer for my clamd.log file. From the clamav.net 3rd
party software page, only one project seems like it will work for me, that
being "Scan Log Analyzer"(link below), but I tested it and it doesn't have much
functionality. I use Oracle Collaboration Suite,
On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 10:31 -0500, David Shows wrote:
> Excellent. I'll go ahead and push this through. Thanks for the help.
Also Dag Wieers has packages (fairly up-to-date) of clamav for all the
RedHat distros including EL and FC.
See http://dag.wieers.com/home-made/apt/packages.php
>
> Davi
On 9/27/05, Tripp Sims <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stephen J. Smoogen wrote:
>
> >From my day job. When looking at purchasing various products, we go
>
> So you have experienced first hand, where 'open source' (free as in
> speech) products have gotten the cold shoulder due to OMB in U.S.
> Feder
Stephen J. Smoogen wrote:
From my day job. When looking at purchasing various products, we go
from our Department guides which are based on OMB and/or NIST
standards. If the US Govt is serious about it.. then the OMB would put
in a clause that US Government funds could only be used when the
anti
Hi,
sure, i like the idea, but im as sure they wont get it done properly.
why?
lets say the naming problem is as old as the virus problem itself.
maybe not that old, but when the first two av scanners were availible,
exactly these problems showed up.
A calls it cat, B calls it dog.
so why shall
On 9/27/05, Tripp Sims <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stephen J. Smoogen wrote:
>
> > The standard big stick is that the US Govt OMB will require all US
> > Govt Computers to use vendors that list their viruses with the CME
> > numbers. This uses the 'we are going to spend our money on those who
> >
Stephen J. Smoogen wrote:
The standard big stick is that the US Govt OMB will require all US
Govt Computers to use vendors that list their viruses with the CME
numbers. This uses the 'we are going to spend our money on those who
comply' which gets most vendors to comply. This also works against
On 9/27/05, Dennis Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> In an industry where being consistantly first with anti-viral code translates
> to
> revenue there is no reason to expect adding this layer of bureaucracy will
> gather much following. This is a solution for an insignificant problem. It is
Excellent. I'll go ahead and push this through. Thanks for the help.
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James Kosin
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2005 10:27 AM
To: ClamAV users ML
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Issues with ClamAV and Re
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
David Shows wrote:
| Morning all,
|
| My version of ClamAV .85 has become outdated and I need to upgrade.
|Unfortunately I get error messages when I try to use RPM to upgrade
because
|of incompatibilities with zlib packages. I have not tried
Daniel J McDonald wrote:
On Wed, 2005-09-28 at 00:10 +1000, Bill Maidment wrote:
Daniel J McDonald wrote:
Since the so-called "major players" are supposedly on board with this,
will we see clamav providing input to this project?
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,1862251,00.asp
Frankly, it
On Wed, 2005-09-28 at 00:10 +1000, Bill Maidment wrote:
> Daniel J McDonald wrote:
> > Since the so-called "major players" are supposedly on board with this,
> > will we see clamav providing input to this project?
> > http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,1862251,00.asp
> >
> > Frankly, it seems pr
Morning all,
My version of ClamAV .85 has become outdated and I need to upgrade.
Unfortunately I get error messages when I try to use RPM to upgrade because
of incompatibilities with zlib packages. I have not tried to ignore the
issues and force an install, but running out of ideas.
Anyon
I would like to add to this I have been having the exact same problems, I
have tried all of the latest versions of the milter and all exhibit the same
problem, I am running the milter with the following options to try and keep
the email flowing.
--dont-log-clean --dont-scan-on-error --max-childre
On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 14:53, Daniel J McDonald wrote:
> Since the so-called "major players" are supposedly on board with this,
> will we see clamav providing input to this project?
> http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,1862251,00.asp
>
> Frankly, it seems pretty hokey to me...
I'd like to know w
Daniel J McDonald wrote:
Since the so-called "major players" are supposedly on board with this,
will we see clamav providing input to this project?
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,1862251,00.asp
Frankly, it seems pretty hokey to me...
I say, everyone do their own thing. Whoever choses th
Since the so-called "major players" are supposedly on board with this,
will we see clamav providing input to this project?
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,1862251,00.asp
Frankly, it seems pretty hokey to me...
--
Daniel J McDonald, CCIE # 2495, CNX, CISSP # 78281
Austin Energy
[EMAIL PROTE
On Mon, 26 Sep 2005 21:34:13 -0700
Tony Cratz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> reference to `cli_gentemp'
> /usr/local/lib/libclamav.so.1.4: undefined reference to
> `pthread_cleanup_pop'
> /usr/local/lib/libclamav.so.1.4: undefined reference to
> `pthread_cleanup_push'
[...]
> what do I
On 27/09/05, rick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello all,
> Could someone direct me to some information on how to configure clamav.
> I have spent numerous hours trying to get it to work. I have a big time
> problem with permissions with the software, also pid's wont start also
> sock files.
How a
26 matches
Mail list logo
