On 9/27/05, Dennis Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > In an industry where being consistantly first with anti-viral code translates > to > revenue there is no reason to expect adding this layer of bureaucracy will > gather much following. This is a solution for an insignificant problem. It is > less important to know what to call a thing than to respond rapidly to the > thing. As my flight instructor used to say, "aviate first, then communicate". >
The standard big stick is that the US Govt OMB will require all US Govt Computers to use vendors that list their viruses with the CME numbers. This uses the 'we are going to spend our money on those who comply' which gets most vendors to comply. This also works against 'free' products if they do not 'comply'. > I don't care about the names, I care about the process and I think for ClamAV > the process is working very well. > > dp > _______________________________________________ > http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html > -- Stephen J Smoogen. CSIRT/Linux System Administrator _______________________________________________ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
