I installed clamav on redhat 9 and also the clamav milter so that it will scan
all mail coming in and out, and i also run the
clamscan, it will detect virus.
now my problem is milter is not communicating with sendmail (its not scanning
mails).
in the sendmail log file this message will came
Pete Sherwin S. Villanueva wrote:
> i've set up clamav in my redhat 9 and i'm using clamav-0.83. i attach the
> test file for my mails but it didnt scan. please help me how to.
Clamav by itself doesn't scan the mail, you have to install whatever is necesary
on your mail setup.
If your mail serv
i've set up clamav in my redhat 9 and i'm using clamav-0.83. i attach the test
file for my mails but it didnt scan. please help me how to.
thanks
choi
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
What is the total memory consumption of mail.cvd and
daily.cvd after they are loaded into the memory ?
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Plan great trips with Yahoo! Travel: Now over 17,000 guides!
http://travel.yahoo.com/p-travelguide
__
Well it seems to be using the older /etc/clamav.conf and those
permissions are:
-rwxr--r-- 1 root root 7285 Apr 19 13:16 /etc/clamav.conf
Although i did try just making 777 and this did not seem to help. But
thanks for the suggestions. :)
On Tue, 2005-04-19 at 16:01 -0400, Jim Maul wrote:
>
Mike Partyka wrote:
Hello Jim,
Thanks for the response.
Um..clamav 0.83 uses clamd.conf, not clamav.conf.
This also confused me, when i looked at the man page it indicated that
since 0.80 the config file name was changed to clamd.conf, but this does
not seem to be the problem as i sym-linked the e
On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 14:37:03 -0500
Mike Partyka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Um..clamav 0.83 uses clamd.conf, not clamav.conf.
> This also confused me, when i looked at the man page it indicated that
> since 0.80 the config file name was changed to clamd.conf, but this
> does not seem to be the p
Hello Jim,
Thanks for the response.
>Um..clamav 0.83 uses clamd.conf, not clamav.conf.
This also confused me, when i looked at the man page it indicated that
since 0.80 the config file name was changed to clamd.conf, but this does
not seem to be the problem as i sym-linked the existing /etc/clama
Niek wrote:
On 4/19/2005 8:25 PM +0200, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
Does it send itself via e-mail?
No they didn't send themselves per e-mail.
So what you're saying is, only selfspreading e-mail viruses
qualify to make it through the submit process ?
No, but Email borne malware has the highest priority.I k
On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 14:44:41 -0400
Jim Maul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mike Partyka wrote:
> > Hello, i only just started working on ClamAV version 0.83 this
> > morning, with a mail server product based on HP's Open Mail, running
> > on a SuSE Ent. Server 9.
> >
> > I am a little confused abou
Mike Partyka wrote:
Hello, i only just started working on ClamAV version 0.83 this morning,
with a mail server product based on HP's Open Mail, running on a SuSE
Ent. Server 9.
I am a little confused about the two configuration
files /etc/freshclam.conf and /etc/clamav.conf, they seem to overlap an
Hello, i only just started working on ClamAV version 0.83 this morning,
with a mail server product based on HP's Open Mail, running on a SuSE
Ent. Server 9.
I am a little confused about the two configuration
files /etc/freshclam.conf and /etc/clamav.conf, they seem to overlap and
contain many of t
On Tue, 2005-04-19 at 20:29 +0200, Niek wrote:
> On 4/19/2005 8:25 PM +0200, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> > Does it send itself via e-mail?
>
> No they didn't send themselves per e-mail.
> So what you're saying is, only selfspreading e-mail viruses
> qualify to make it through the submit process ?
No, se
On 4/19/2005 8:25 PM +0200, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
Does it send itself via e-mail?
No they didn't send themselves per e-mail.
So what you're saying is, only selfspreading e-mail viruses
qualify to make it through the submit process ?
Niek
___
http://lurker.cl
On Apr 19, 2005, at 2:24 PM, Kelson wrote:
Bart Silverstrim wrote:
Do I want to remove the hash before DisableDefaultScanOptions in
order to get the
sections to work?
No. This was discussed yesterday. There are options that are enabled
by default, and DisableDefaultOptions wipes those and give
On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 20:17:04 +0200
Niek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/19/2005 2:13 PM +0200, Albert Pauw wrote:
> > I have submitted two executables more than a week ago.
> > They were found by the AVG virusscanner (amongst others) as
> > Downloader.Small.21.AY and Downloader.Small.22.K, but i
Bart Silverstrim wrote:
Do I want to remove the hash before DisableDefaultScanOptions in order
to get the
sections to work?
No. This was discussed yesterday. There are options that are enabled
by default, and DisableDefaultOptions wipes those and gives you a clean
slate. You don't need it --
On 4/19/2005 2:13 PM +0200, Albert Pauw wrote:
I have submitted two executables more than a week ago.
They were found by the AVG virusscanner (amongst others) as
Downloader.Small.21.AY and Downloader.Small.22.K, but it seems they are not
incorporated into updates. How long does it usually take fo
On Apr 19, 2005, at 1:56 PM, Daniel J McDonald wrote:
On Tue, 2005-04-19 at 11:52 -0600, lists wrote:
How should I submit this to see if it is a virus?
Make certain detectbrokenexecutable is enabled.
Stupid question but I thought I might as well ask anyway...going in on
my own system to enable thi
On Tue, 2005-04-19 at 11:52 -0600, lists wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am getting a bunch of emails to random addresses at one of
> my domains with the following text:
worm.sober.n
>
> ---
> Hello,
> First, Very Sorry for my bad English.
>
> How should I submit this to see if it is a virus?
Make cert
Hello,
I am getting a bunch of emails to random addresses at one of
my domains with the following text:
---
Hello,
First, Very Sorry for my bad English.
Someone is sending your private e-mails on my address.
It's probably an e-mail provider error!
At time, I've got over 10 mails on my account, b
In the current docs on clamav-milter
(http://clamav.net/doc/latest/html/node19.html)
the example uses INPUT_MAIL_FILTER followed by
define('confINPUT_MAIL_FILTERS', ...
According to the sendmail docs the second entry will invalidate the first.
(http://www.sendmail.org/m4/adding_mailfilters.ht
>
> Now, as to whether or not it can be used with that specific socks
> proxy - why not talk to the developer of the proxy
You would be very pleased to know that I have done that. And I got an
answer from the developer himself and here is the gist
"can delegate socks proxy be configured to useht
On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 08:44:45 +0200 (CEST)
Arnaud Huret <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Back to the original problem. Is Simon's answer the cause (only
> > > broken PE headers are detected not broken somewhere else
> > > executables)?
> >
> > Hopefully Arnaud will be able to catch one soon so we
I have submitted two executables more than a week ago.
They were found by the AVG virusscanner (amongst others) as
Downloader.Small.21.AY and Downloader.Small.22.K, but it seems they are not
incorporated into updates. How long does it usually take for a submission to
enter the updates?
Thanks,
On 4/19/05, torrent man <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> but couldn't find any reference to clamAV being used with delegate
> http://www.delegate.org/delegate/ socks proxy ?
>
> did you post the wrong urls ?
Given how vague your first post was - no. All you asked was whether
or not you could use cl
Arnaud Huret <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here you are.
>
> Many thanks,
> Arnaud
Thanks for the samples Arnaud, they are both viable and run on my test kit -
and they are both detected using ClamAV devel-20050413/840/Tue Apr 19 02:42:09
2005.
mail.document.Datex-packed.exe: Worm.Sober.N FOUND
W
On Tue, 2005-04-19 at 09:20 +, Andy Fiddaman wrote:
>
> Fair enough, but it's a recent change which is why I wondered if it was
> intentional.
It's not a recent change, we just don't change the build that often.
-trog
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
On Tuesday 19 Apr 2005 10:44, Chris Masters wrote:
>
> --- Nigel Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tuesday 19 Apr 2005 09:23, Chris Masters wrote:
> >
> > > > > 3) Should clam detect the virus when given the
> > > > entire
> > > > > bounce message?
> > > >
> > > > Yes, if you have a sample
--- Nigel Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 19 Apr 2005 09:23, Chris Masters wrote:
>
> > > > 3) Should clam detect the virus when given the
> > > entire
> > > > bounce message?
> > >
> > > Yes, if you have a sample which is not found,
> please
> > > email it to me.
> >
> > We curre
On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, Trog wrote:
; On Mon, 2005-04-18 at 18:22 +, Andy Fiddaman wrote:
; > On Mon, 18 Apr 2005, Trog wrote:
; > ;
; > ; Run autoreconf
; >
; > Is this something that has changed and will stay this way ? I don't
; > currently have the auto utilities on my Sun servers and don't r
On Tuesday 19 Apr 2005 09:23, Chris Masters wrote:
> > > 3) Should clam detect the virus when given the
> > entire
> > > bounce message?
> >
> > Yes, if you have a sample which is not found, please
> > email it to me.
>
> We currently don't ask clamav to scan the entire raw
> message - just each
On Mon, 2005-04-18 at 18:22 +, Andy Fiddaman wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Apr 2005, Trog wrote:
> ;
> ; Run autoreconf
>
> Is this something that has changed and will stay this way ? I don't
> currently have the auto utilities on my Sun servers and don't really want
> to add and have to maintain them.
Arnaud Huret <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I catched two diffrent samples (NetSky.Y and Sober.gen) not catched
> by ClamAV but well by TrendMicro VirusWall. I submitted them through
> the site but I get a message saying 'already recognized'.
>
> What should I do to submit them to the team for fur
Thanks for your comments Nigel.
> >
> > So, some questions:
> >
> > 1) How dangerous are these virus-bounces?
>
> In theory not at all, but I don't trust MUAs not to
> be broken
> so clamAV does look for and find them.
Exactly!
>
> > 2) Should clam detect the virus when given the
> > text/plai
Went through the mentioned urls
http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanb/documents/quotingguide.html
http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
but couldn't find any reference to clamAV being used with delegate
http://www.delegate.org/delegate/ socks
On Tuesday 19 Apr 2005 00:08, Chris Masters wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We've had some problems with ligitimate bounces coming
> from qmail that contain one text/plain mime part. This
> single mime part contains some error information and
> then the original raw infected mail in MIME format.
>
> We scan e
37 matches
Mail list logo
