Re: [Clamav-users] Re: Re: Windows port ?

2004-09-21 Thread Fajar A. Nugraha
Tomasz Kojm wrote: I didn't use any source code from orginal project. This full object oriented C++ rewriting. I can send source code to project manager I you want to check about this. I don't modify the DB, I only download it and use it. I display DB copyright in the About Window. The databas

Re: [Clamav-users] announcing ClamAV 0.80rc

2004-09-21 Thread Fajar A. Nugraha
Tomasz Kojm wrote: Well, DNSDatabaseInfo does not affect virus recognition. What IS the default behaviour of clamav when a particular default option does not exists? Is running clamd (and freshclam) with empty clamd.conf and freshclam.conf (if it is possible) be the same as running with the de

Re: [Clamav-users] Notification E-mail

2004-09-21 Thread Ryan Moore
Brian Morrison wrote: You need to do something appropriate to sendmail.cf or the milter configuration (which I know nothing about I'm afraid) to do this. This is not something that can be configured in clamav AFAICS. He was referring to the clamav-milter, which *does* hook clamav into sendmail, an

Re: [Clamav-users] Notification E-mail

2004-09-21 Thread Damian Menscher
On Wed, 22 Sep 2004, Jan Pieter Cornet wrote: On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 04:26:40PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It is perfectly acceptable to place an explanatory message in an SMTP REJECT message. Acceptable, maybe, but I believe it's better to simply discard all viruses. And most sane people bel

Re: [Clamav-users] announcing ClamAV 0.80rc

2004-09-21 Thread Doug Hardie
I have looked all over the clamav.net web pages and I can't find it. Where is it? --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on who ports your pro

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.80rc build error

2004-09-21 Thread Jeremy Kitchen
On Tuesday 21 September 2004 04:09 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Tue, 21 Sep 2004, Jeremy Kitchen wrote: > > On Tuesday 21 September 2004 12:39 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lssl > > > > make sure you have the openssl and openssl-devel packages installed. > > Than

[Clamav-users] about the server-traffic thread

2004-09-21 Thread Thomas
hey folks, from the older thread about using dns for cvd-updates and server-traffic. There was the note that there is no easy way to patch binary files. I was thinking about this one: For gentoo-linux there's the need to download sources packages which are rather large in size. At the moment there

Re: [Clamav-users] announcing ClamAV 0.80rc

2004-09-21 Thread Bill Maidment
Matt wrote: 1) Reading the README. Agreed. How about adding an incompatibility comment similar to this from the mimedefang Changelog ? WARNING: Before upgrading MIMEDefang, please search this file for *** NOTE INCOMPATIBILITY ** to see if anything has changed that will affect your filter. --

Re: [Clamav-users] announcing ClamAV 0.80rc

2004-09-21 Thread Stephen Gran
On Tue, Sep 21, 2004 at 03:30:14PM +0200, Stefan Hornburg said: > On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 13:03:32 +0200 > Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 12:33:22 +0700 > > "Fajar A. Nugraha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >-) clamd > > > > + clamav.conf was renamed clamd.

Re: [Clamav-users] Notification E-mail

2004-09-21 Thread Jan Pieter Cornet
On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 04:26:40PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > It is perfectly acceptable to place an explanatory message in an SMTP > REJECT message. Acceptable, maybe, but I believe it's better to simply discard all viruses. Why? Since all you achieve with rejects is indirectly causing a

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.80rc build error

2004-09-21 Thread listuser
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004, Jeremy Kitchen wrote: > On Tuesday 21 September 2004 12:39 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lssl > > make sure you have the openssl and openssl-devel packages installed. Thanks for the reply. I thought I implied that OpenSSL was compiled and instal

Re: [Clamav-users] announcing ClamAV 0.80rc

2004-09-21 Thread listuser
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004, Trog wrote: > On Tue, 2004-09-21 at 14:23, Frank Elsner wrote: > > On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 13:03:32 +0200 Tomasz Kojm wrote: > > > > [ ... ] > > > > > Almost all changes are backward compatible but the point of the renaming > > > was to force users to review/edit their config

[Clamav-users] Errors with rc2

2004-09-21 Thread Rick Macdougall
Hi, I know this was reported earlier, but just to back up the initial posters message. 2004-09-21 17:03:04.990049500 LibClamAV Warning: Unsupported message format `disposition-notification' 2004-09-21 17:03:04.990056500 [EMAIL PROTECTED]/work/./msg: Bad format or broken data ERROR So yes, it

Re: [Clamav-users] Notification E-mail

2004-09-21 Thread Nigel Horne
On Tuesday 21 Sep 2004 16:44, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Nigel Horne wrote: > > On Monday 20 Sep 2004 22:45, Jonathan Pitcher wrote: > >> Is it possible to send a message onto the user that they had an > >> e-mail blocked? Or to an admin stating that [EMAIL PROTECTED] had a virus > >> sent to them

[Clamav-users] Clamav 0.80 Final release?

2004-09-21 Thread LOYET Jérôme
Hello, In order to make the port for OpenBSD. I'd like to know when the final release of clamav 0.80 will go out. The real question is: Do I need to make the port of 0.80rc2 or 0.80 final will be out quickly? Thanks, ++ jerome +---+ | |

[Clamav-users] Does the RAR unpacker still leak ?

2004-09-21 Thread Christopher X. Candreva
With all the discussion about leaks, or the lack thereof, recently, I notice the ScanRAR section of clamd.conf still says that the RAR unpacker "is disabled by default because the code terribly leaks". Does it in fact still leak, or has this been fixed and the comment should be updated ?

[Clamav-users] 0.80rc bad format or broken data error?

2004-09-21 Thread Scott Call
I just installed 0.80rc and got the following error: /var/spool/exim/scan/1C9pqn-0003rF-0l/1C9pqn-0003rF-0l.eml: Bad format or broken data ERROR (this is with exim+exiscan connecting to clamd via socket) I saw there errors several times from the same IP, so I'm assuming it's the same message ove

Re: [Clamav-users] announcing ClamAV 0.80rc

2004-09-21 Thread Brian Morrison
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 17:48:15 +0100 in [EMAIL PROTECTED] Brian Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I look forward to seeing how I get on with this new version, so far > it seems to be quite happy and freshclam has not complained either. And now, before even having time to draw a decent breath,

[Clamav-users] Hooray for .80rc

2004-09-21 Thread Tim Howell
ClamAV development team-- Thank you very, very much for ClamAV. This product has done a remarkable job of keeping virii out of out network. Your support and continual improvement of ClamAV are quite remarkable. Thank you. =) --Tim Howell --MIS Supervisor, First Evangelical Free Church of Full

Re: [Clamav-users] announcing ClamAV 0.80rc

2004-09-21 Thread Stefan Hornburg
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 15:49:56 +0100 Trog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 2004-09-21 at 15:24, Rob Evers wrote: > > Trog wrote: > > > On Tue, 2004-09-21 at 14:30, Stefan Hornburg wrote: > > > > > > > > >>In that case we should probably rot somewhere, but you make the life for > > >>packager'

Re: [Clamav-users] Notification E-mail

2004-09-21 Thread Brian Morrison
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 08:44:45 -0700 in [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If there is no way to do this currently, can I submit this as a > feature request for clamav-milter? But as you have already been told, it is up to the MTA to do this. When Exim passes incoming mail through cl

Re: [Clamav-users] sigtool on freebsd - unable to unpack cvd files

2004-09-21 Thread Tomasz Kojm
On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 15:49:14 -0400 Dewey Hylton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > $ sigtool --unpack-current daily.cvd > LibClamAV Error: Unknown type flag 3. > ERROR: Can't unpack file. This error comes from libclamav/cvd.c:cli_untgz() and was also reported on Cygwin. We're working on a fix. --

Re: [Clamav-users] announcing ClamAV 0.80rc

2004-09-21 Thread Brian Morrison
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 15:49:57 +0100 in [EMAIL PROTECTED] Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Not specifically in reply to you, Bill, but has anyone complaining > actually thought of: > > 1) Reading the README. Did that, everything worked first time for me except for me leaving an unrecognised o

[Clamav-users] sigtool on freebsd - unable to unpack cvd files

2004-09-21 Thread Dewey Hylton
i see the following problem in freebsd 4.8 and 5.2.1 - but not in any of the linux distros i've tried: $ freshclam --datadir . --log freshclam.log ClamAV update process started at Sun Sep 19 10:09:45 2004 Reading CVD header (main.cvd): OK Downloading main.cvd [*] main.cvd updated (version: 27, sig

RE: [Clamav-users] Notification E-mail

2004-09-21 Thread Matthew.van.Eerde
Nigel Horne wrote: > On Monday 20 Sep 2004 22:45, Jonathan Pitcher wrote: >> Is it possible to send a message onto the user that they had an >> e-mail blocked? Or to an admin stating that [EMAIL PROTECTED] had a virus >> sent to them? > > Yes it is, though the first option is not advisable. You c

Re: [Clamav-users] announcing ClamAV 0.80rc

2004-09-21 Thread Christopher X. Candreva
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004, Brian Morrison wrote: > Might one enquire which are the recommended options for review/change > please? Every time I upgrade clamav, I do a diff of my clamav.conf with the one in the distribution, and use that to patch new options into my config file. ie, from clamav-dist/e

Re: [Clamav-users] announcing ClamAV 0.80rc

2004-09-21 Thread Christopher X. Candreva
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: > Especially since make install does not even put clamd.conf it the default etc > dir > (I'm using latest CVS snapshot, which is newer that the 0.80rc, on Solaris). Oooh -- opposite problem here. make install on 0.80rc, Solaris 8 -- make install DOES

Re: [Clamav-users] announcing ClamAV 0.80rc

2004-09-21 Thread Trog
On Tue, 2004-09-21 at 15:24, Rob Evers wrote: > Trog wrote: > > On Tue, 2004-09-21 at 14:30, Stefan Hornburg wrote: > > > > > >>In that case we should probably rot somewhere, but you make the life for packager's > >>of ClamAV (e.g. Debian) unnecessarily hard. > > > > > > Are you saying that you

Re: [Clamav-users] Re: Re: Windows port ?

2004-09-21 Thread Tomasz Kojm
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 14:29:55 +0200 "Remi Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ralph Angenendt wrote: > > > Freeware? Won't be possible. AFAICS all components of clamav are > > licensed to you under the GPL - so you will have to publish your > > software under a license, which is compatible to the

Re: [Clamav-users] announcing ClamAV 0.80rc

2004-09-21 Thread Jim Maul
Quoting Tomasz Papszun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 at 13:03:32 +0200, Tomasz Kojm wrote: On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 12:33:22 +0700 "Fajar A. Nugraha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >-) clamd > > + clamav.conf was renamed clamd.conf > > > Um, this has got the one of the most annoying change

Re: [Clamav-users] announcing ClamAV 0.80rc

2004-09-21 Thread Matt
Bill Maidment wrote: > Trog wrote: > > > > > It's not a replacement, it's an addition to the existing > > freshclam.conf > > > > > So why wasn't freshclam.conf renamed to force people to look at that > too? > Not specifically in reply to you, Bill, but has anyone complaining actually thoug

Re: [Clamav-users] announcing ClamAV 0.80rc

2004-09-21 Thread Tomasz Kojm
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 23:11:08 +1000 Bill Maidment <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Trog wrote: > > > > > It's not a replacement, it's an addition to the existing > > freshclam.conf > > > > > So why wasn't freshclam.conf renamed to force people to look at that > too? Well, DNSDatabaseInfo does not

Re: [Clamav-users] announcing ClamAV 0.80rc

2004-09-21 Thread Rob Evers
Trog wrote: On Tue, 2004-09-21 at 14:30, Stefan Hornburg wrote: In that case we should probably rot somewhere, but you make the life for packager's of ClamAV (e.g. Debian) unnecessarily hard. Are you saying that you would otherwise have simply left the existing clamav.conf file unaltered, thereby

Re: [Clamav-users] announcing ClamAV 0.80rc

2004-09-21 Thread Jim Maul
Quoting "Fajar A. Nugraha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Luca Gibelli wrote: -) clamd + clamav.conf was renamed clamd.conf Um, this has got the one of the most annoying change for me in the history of clamav (the other ones was the change of libclamav.so.1.0.3 to libclamav.so.1.0.4, and the now-missing

Re: [Clamav-users] announcing ClamAV 0.80rc

2004-09-21 Thread Bill Maidment
Tomasz Papszun wrote: I'd like to add that changing the name from clamav.conf to clamd.conf was requested by users on the ML a few times. So, it's not our fault ;-). You are correct there. But it didn't appear in any devel versions until the 80rc came out. That's what took me by surprise. I'm all

Re: [Clamav-users] announcing ClamAV 0.80rc

2004-09-21 Thread Tomasz Papszun
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 at 13:03:32 +0200, Tomasz Kojm wrote: > On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 12:33:22 +0700 > "Fajar A. Nugraha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >-) clamd > > > + clamav.conf was renamed clamd.conf > > > > > Um, this has got the one of the most annoying change for me in the > > history of

Re: [Clamav-users] announcing ClamAV 0.80rc

2004-09-21 Thread Trog
On Tue, 2004-09-21 at 14:30, Stefan Hornburg wrote: > In that case we should probably rot somewhere, but you make the life for packager's > of ClamAV (e.g. Debian) unnecessarily hard. Are you saying that you would otherwise have simply left the existing clamav.conf file unaltered, thereby leaving

Re: [Clamav-users] announcing ClamAV 0.80rc

2004-09-21 Thread Stefan Hornburg
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 13:03:32 +0200 Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 12:33:22 +0700 > "Fajar A. Nugraha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >-) clamd > > > + clamav.conf was renamed clamd.conf > > > > > > > > Um, this has got the one of the most annoying change for

Re: [Clamav-users] announcing ClamAV 0.80rc

2004-09-21 Thread Nigel Horne
On Tuesday 21 Sep 2004 12:44, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: > Really? Then would you say my ChangeLog is wrong? > > Mon Sep 20 18:08:53 BST 2004 (njh) > -- > * libclamav/mbox.c: Some performance enhancements > > Mon Sep 20 15:31:21 CEST 2004 (tk) > -

Re: [Clamav-users] announcing ClamAV 0.80rc

2004-09-21 Thread Trog
On Tue, 2004-09-21 at 14:23, Frank Elsner wrote: > On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 13:03:32 +0200 Tomasz Kojm wrote: > > [ ... ] > > > Almost all changes are backward compatible but the point of the renaming > > was to force users to review/edit their config files. Most of you are > > simply too lazy to ad

Re: [Clamav-users] announcing ClamAV 0.80rc

2004-09-21 Thread Trog
On Tue, 2004-09-21 at 14:11, Bill Maidment wrote: > Trog wrote: > > > > > It's not a replacement, it's an addition to the existing freshclam.conf > > > So why wasn't freshclam.conf renamed to force people to look at that too? The new options in clamd.conf have an affect on the number of viruse

Re: [Clamav-users] announcing ClamAV 0.80rc

2004-09-21 Thread Frank Elsner
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 13:03:32 +0200 Tomasz Kojm wrote: [ ... ] > Almost all changes are backward compatible but the point of the renaming > was to force users to review/edit their config files. Most of you are > simply too lazy to add, activate, or tune new options without such > dramatic change

Re: [Clamav-users] announcing ClamAV 0.80rc

2004-09-21 Thread Bill Maidment
Trog wrote: It's not a replacement, it's an addition to the existing freshclam.conf So why wasn't freshclam.conf renamed to force people to look at that too? -- _/_/_/_/ _/ _/ _/_/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/_/_/ _/ _/_/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/_/_/ _/ _/ _/ Bill Maidment Mai

Re: [Clamav-users] announcing ClamAV 0.80rc

2004-09-21 Thread Trog
On Tue, 2004-09-21 at 13:42, Bill Maidment wrote: > Trog wrote: > > > > > Also, your freshclam.conf will be missing DNSDatabaseInfo > > > > My freshclam.conf is indeed missing DNSDatabaseInfo, but I don't see > anything replacing that. It's not a replacement, it's an addition to the existing

Re: [Clamav-users] announcing ClamAV 0.80rc

2004-09-21 Thread Brian Morrison
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 13:03:32 +0200 in [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Almost all changes are backward compatible but the point of the > renaming was to force users to review/edit their config files. Might one enquire which are the recommended options for review/change

Re: [Clamav-users] Re: Re: Windows port ?

2004-09-21 Thread Fajar A. Nugraha
Remi Thomas wrote: Tomasz Kojm wrote: Please remember that the license of ClamAV databases require your software to follow a GPL compliant license. The ClamAV database uses the GNU general license. I don't modify the DB, I only use it. The license is extracted and displayed in the About Win

Re: [Clamav-users] announcing ClamAV 0.80rc

2004-09-21 Thread Bill Maidment
Trog wrote: Also, your freshclam.conf will be missing DNSDatabaseInfo My freshclam.conf is indeed missing DNSDatabaseInfo, but I don't see anything replacing that. Is there supposed to be a freshclamd.conf ? -- _/_/_/_/ _/ _/ _/_/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/_/_/ _/ _/_/

Re: [Clamav-users] [Help] Hi - How conf clamav with postfix mailserver

2004-09-21 Thread Thomas Lamy
Sushil Gholap wrote: Hi This is my first mail to this list. I want to know how to configure clamav with postfix(linux plateform ) mail server for scanning the mails for viruses. Thanks in advance. sUsHiL gHolAp. Have a look at amavisd-new (http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/) and/or mailscanner (h

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav on debian stable

2004-09-21 Thread Thomas Lamy
agenteo wrote: this is the log I get: /home/teottie/.viminfo: Unable to open file or directory ERROR /home/teottie/mbox: Unable to open file or directory ERROR /home/teottie/.bash_history: Unable to open file or directory ERROR /home/teottie/clamav-testfiles/test-failure.rar: RAR module failure ERR

[Clamav-users] Re: Re: Windows port ?

2004-09-21 Thread Remi Thomas
Ralph Angenendt wrote: > Freeware? Won't be possible. AFAICS all components of clamav are > licensed to you under the GPL - so you will have to publish your > software under a license, which is compatible to the GPL. > > Ralph I didn't use any source code from orginal project. This full object or

[Clamav-users] Re: Re: Windows port ?

2004-09-21 Thread Remi Thomas
Tomasz Kojm wrote: > Please remember that the license of ClamAV databases require your > software to follow a GPL compliant license. The ClamAV database uses the GNU general license. I don't modify the DB, I only use it. The license is extracted and displayed in the About Windows Remi -

Re: [Clamav-users] [Help] Hi - How conf clamav with postfix mailserver

2004-09-21 Thread Jeremy Kitchen
On Tuesday 21 September 2004 06:45 am, Sushil Gholap wrote: > Hi > > This is my first mail to this list. > > I want to know how to configure clamav with > postfix(linux plateform ) mail server for scanning the > mails for viruses. http://www.google.com/search?q=clamav%20postfix%20howto http://www.

Re: [Clamav-users] announcing ClamAV 0.80rc

2004-09-21 Thread Trog
On Tue, 2004-09-21 at 12:44, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: > Tomasz Kojm wrote: > > > >Almost all changes are backward compatible but the point of the renaming > >was to force users to review/edit their config files. Most of you are > >simply too lazy to add, activate, or tune new options without such >

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.80rc build error

2004-09-21 Thread Jeremy Kitchen
On Tuesday 21 September 2004 12:39 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lssl make sure you have the openssl and openssl-devel packages installed. -Jeremy -- Jeremy Kitchen ++ Systems Administrator ++ Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ++ www.inter7.com ++

Re: [Clamav-users] Re: Windows port ?

2004-09-21 Thread Ralph Angenendt
Remi Thomas wrote: > Have a look at http://www.uscanit.com for 1.0 alpha 01 version. > Exe size is 280K and no setup. Freeware? Won't be possible. AFAICS all components of clamav are licensed to you under the GPL - so you will have to publish your software under a license, which is compatible to t

[Clamav-users] [Help] Hi - How conf clamav with postfix mailserver

2004-09-21 Thread Sushil Gholap
Hi This is my first mail to this list. I want to know how to configure clamav with postfix(linux plateform ) mail server for scanning the mails for viruses. Thanks in advance. sUsHiL gHolAp. __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage tha

Re: [Clamav-users] announcing ClamAV 0.80rc

2004-09-21 Thread Fajar A. Nugraha
Tomasz Kojm wrote: Tomasz, can you please make future changes to clamav backward-compatible? In this case, renaming my clamav.conf to Almost all changes are backward compatible but the point of the renaming was to force users to review/edit their config files. Most of you are simply too lazy t

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav on debian stable

2004-09-21 Thread Tomasz Papszun
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 at 12:23:32 +0200, agenteo wrote: > this is the log I get: > /home/teottie/.viminfo: Unable to open file or directory ERROR > /home/teottie/mbox: Unable to open file or directory ERROR > /home/teottie/.bash_history: Unable to open file or directory ERROR [...] > /home/carinic/.b

Re: [Clamav-users] announcing ClamAV 0.80rc

2004-09-21 Thread Tomasz Kojm
On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 20:04:17 -0400 (EDT) "Christopher X. Candreva" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Developers -- could we possibly have a grace period where it will > generate an error, but run, if no longer used options are in the We already follow this way but in case of major releases brutal move

Re: [Clamav-users] Re: Windows port ?

2004-09-21 Thread Tomasz Kojm
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 07:01:37 +0200 "Remi Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > There will be one soon ! > This is the first time I talk about it. UScanIT is about to be ready > in a few week. It uses ClamDB and is not based on cygwin because it's > 100% new Windows code. Inside it's 100% o

Re: [Clamav-users] announcing ClamAV 0.80rc

2004-09-21 Thread Tomasz Kojm
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 12:33:22 +0700 "Fajar A. Nugraha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >-) clamd > > + clamav.conf was renamed clamd.conf > > > > > Um, this has got the one of the most annoying change for me in the > history of clamav Oh, I'm responsible for that change.. > Tomasz, can you pl

RE: [Clamav-users] clamav on debian stable

2004-09-21 Thread agenteo
this is the log I get: /home/teottie/.viminfo: Unable to open file or directory ERROR /home/teottie/mbox: Unable to open file or directory ERROR /home/teottie/.bash_history: Unable to open file or directory ERROR /home/teottie/clamav-testfiles/test-failure.rar: RAR module failure ERROR /home/teotti

RE: [Clamav-users] clamav on debian stable

2004-09-21 Thread agenteo
no I'm not using it, actually I'm just tring clamav to check the samba shares (and take care of infections). I don't have a MTA, I just send text mails (with an extern SMTP) to log samba events. > It could be easily construed that issuing this command would result in > a reply from the clamd daemo

Re: [Clamav-users] announcing ClamAV 0.80rc

2004-09-21 Thread Brian Morrison
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 00:54:18 +0200 in [EMAIL PROTECTED] Luca Gibelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > the development version of ClamAV is ready for general testing! I have just done some quick .spec file hacking and a bit of tidying up and have a first cut version of a src rpm that should build and

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.80rc build fails (differently) on OSX @ mbox.c, with AND without --with-libcurl

2004-09-21 Thread Nigel Horne
On Tuesday 21 Sep 2004 01:50, OpenMacNews wrote: > mbox.c: In function `checkURLs': > mbox.c:2536: warning: assignment discards qualifiers from pointer target type > mbox.c:2537: warning: assignment discards qualifiers from pointer target type > mbox.c: At top level

Re: [Clamav-users] Notification E-mail

2004-09-21 Thread Nigel Horne
On Monday 20 Sep 2004 22:45, Jonathan Pitcher wrote: > We have Clam Av installed and running. It is blocking virus e-mails > but is not generating any notification. > > Is it possible to send a message onto the user that they had an e-mail > blocked? Or to an admin stating that [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Clamav-users] 0.80rc and the new .ndb sig file format

2004-09-21 Thread Kevin Spicer
On Tue, 2004-09-21 at 02:21, Tomasz Kojm wrote: > It seems there's a small type in filetypes.c. Try changing > > {0, "\377\330\377", 4, "JPEG", CL_TYPE_GRAPHICS}, > > to > > {0, "\377\330\377", 3, "JPEG", CL_TYPE_GRAPHICS} That did the trick, thanks very much Tomasz.

Re: [Clamav-users] Notification E-mail

2004-09-21 Thread Niek
On 9/20/2004 11:45 PM +0200, Jonathan Pitcher wrote: We have Clam Av installed and running. It is blocking virus e-mails but is not generating any notification. Is it possible to send a message onto the user that they had an e-mail blocked? Or to an admin stating that [EMAIL PROTECTED] had a viru

Re: [Clamav-users] Getting clamav to log with multilog

2004-09-21 Thread Scott Ryan
On Monday 20 September 2004 21:52, Daniel Alberto Cañas wrote: > On Sep 20, 2004, at 12:41 PM, Matt Gourley wrote: > > Niek wrote: > >> On 9/20/2004 4:32 PM +0200, Matt Gourley wrote: > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> I've been trying to get ClamAV to log via multilog so that I can > >>> generate reports v